Check Out Our Shop
Page 157 of 626 FirstFirst ... 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 ... LastLast
Results 3,901 to 3,925 of 15626

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #3901
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Issaquah, WA
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by mattig View Post
    My kid got on AC's kid's Jessies and promptly told me his new volkls sucked by comparison. I think that 161 Jessie 98 is a sweet spot for the 11-13yr old daily driver. Not gonna let em down in pow either.

    6ft, 220lb. Shitty skier who follows friends down expert terrain to try to fit in. Thoughts on stock vs +1?
    Interesting. Is it coming back for 2018/2019? Could be a great fit for my 10yo son. He's currently on 150's, so the Charlie Murphy in a 151 may not be the best fit as he's been growing like a weed. Love that last part, pretty much sums me up.

    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Ha, we know that. The idea was something white-ish that incorporates some of the great new artwork. But whatever, I'll probably just get those K108 tours in the custom white top sheet, which should still look pretty slick.

    On that note, when is the rollout for the next season's skis on the site? Any day now?
    I like that white topsheet a lot too.

  2. #3902
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    170
    Quote Originally Posted by Reformed View Post
    Easter 2018 by 'Scoe, on Flickr

    Finally had the chance to open the Steeples up on some bigger alpine lines over the Easter weekend. Conditions were great and the Steeples were smooth, stable, consistent and all around awesome. The first few turns on the run in the photo were good enough to make a guy want to sell a kidney and head to Alaska!
    Which Steeples 108 or 116?

  3. #3903
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,900
    I got white topsheets on my BG and think they look rad. Just enough gray herringbone in there to stay barely visible, but yea, I should add a few more stickers too, just in case.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BGs.jpg 
Views:	155 
Size:	278.7 KB 
ID:	231316

  4. #3904
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    Reformed - hole shit, man that looks awesome!

    Nick - nice!

  5. #3905
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by rainy512day View Post
    Which Steeples 108 or 116?
    Stock 184 108s. Tips are just visible in the bottom of the photo.

  6. #3906
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    On the mountain
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by mattig View Post

    6ft, 220lb. Shitty skier who follows friends down expert terrain to try to fit in. Thoughts on stock vs +1?
    Im 6’ 195lbs on 184 stock layup Goats. I find the stock layup to be stiff enough, tho if i was having them built all over again, I’d go with extra carbon for added stiffness. I really like my K98’s w/ extra carbon for they way the exit the turn and how it helps the tips blast thru crud. Given that you’re a bit heavier than I am, I’d think you’d like the extra carbon and added stiffness.

    edit to add: i’m planning on replacing these when the next iteration comes out in the 2019/2020 line and plan to go both longer at 189 and extra carbon.

  7. #3907
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Driving2VT
    Posts
    4,858
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    I got white topsheets on my BG and think they look rad. Just enough gray herringbone in there to stay barely visible, but yea, I should add a few more stickers too, just in case.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BGs.jpg 
Views:	155 
Size:	278.7 KB 
ID:	231316
    Those do look rad.
    Uno mas

  8. #3908
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,924
    Quote Originally Posted by MHSP1497 View Post
    Im 6’ 195lbs on 184 stock layup Goats. I find the stock layup to be stiff enough, tho if i was having them built all over again, I’d go with extra carbon for added stiffness. I really like my K98’s w/ extra carbon for they way the exit the turn and how it helps the tips blast thru crud. Given that you’re a bit heavier than I am, I’d think you’d like the extra carbon and added stiffness.

    edit to add: i’m planning on replacing these when the next iteration comes out in the 2019/2020 line and plan to go both longer at 189 and extra carbon.
    This is what I'm looking for, thanks.



    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  9. #3909
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    660
    I'm thinking about some BG's. Anyone got thoughts on size? I had some 184 Line Mordecais, too centered and floppy. I have some 190 Line Sick Day 114's. They're awesome charging down faces on powder day, and busting through crud or chopped pow. but they're way too long and stiff for trees or bumps, it gets exhausting real quick. My daily is a 181 Icelantic Nomad 95, they could be longer, like 185 and that would prob be ideal. I really want some Wrenegade 98's after demoing them at Loveland, but maybe later.

  10. #3910
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,900
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    I'm thinking about some BG's. Anyone got thoughts on size? I had some 184 Line Mordecais, too centered and floppy. I have some 190 Line Sick Day 114's. They're awesome charging down faces on powder day, and busting through crud or chopped pow. but they're way too long and stiff for trees or bumps, it gets exhausting real quick. My daily is a 181 Icelantic Nomad 95, they could be longer, like 185 and that would prob be ideal. I really want some Wrenegade 98's after demoing them at Loveland, but maybe later.
    if you're close to a 325bsl you can try my 184cm.

  11. #3911
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    660
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    if you're close to a 325bsl you can try my 184cm.
    whoa, really? I'm actually exactly a 325. I'm trying to decide between the 184 and 189.

  12. #3912
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    3,097

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    I'm thinking about some BG's. Anyone got thoughts on size? I had some 184 Line Mordecais, too centered and floppy. I have some 190 Line Sick Day 114's. They're awesome charging down faces on powder day, and busting through crud or chopped pow. but they're way too long and stiff for trees or bumps, it gets exhausting real quick. My daily is a 181 Icelantic Nomad 95, they could be longer, like 185 and that would prob be ideal. I really want some Wrenegade 98's after demoing them at Loveland, but maybe later.
    Go 184cm for trees, or 189cm for charging more open terrain.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #3913
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    7B Selkirks USA
    Posts
    947
    I am 325 BSL and 6' 200# ; Definitely 189 BG's. And I am happy with my 184 Wren 108's

  14. #3914
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    660
    Quote Originally Posted by Kootenai View Post
    I am 325 BSL and 6' 200# ; Definitely 189 BG's. And I am happy with my 184 Wren 108's
    I'm 5'11 and 200. why the 189's?

  15. #3915
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    660
    Quote Originally Posted by Betelgeuse View Post
    Go 184cm for trees, or 189cm for charging more open terrain.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    hmm. maybe 184's and keep the Lines, then.

  16. #3916
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    On the mountain
    Posts
    775
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    hmm. maybe 184's and keep the Lines, then.
    Like I said downthread, I love my 184’s. I’m 6’ and 195lbs. They rule in the trees and are some of the most maneuverable skis I’ve ever been on in soft snow. That being said, I plan on going longer next time around for a little more float (along w/ extra carbon), at the cost of some of that maneuverability. I don’t think you’d be disappointed in the 184’s in any way, I also doubt that you’d wish for extra length. If anything, maybe going custom and adding carbon for stiffness might be more your speed?

  17. #3917
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    905
    Im 6’ 210 lbs and have 189 wren 98’s. If I could do it over id go 184 with extra carbon.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  18. #3918
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    7B Selkirks USA
    Posts
    947
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    I'm 5'11 and 200. why the 189's?
    Ahh, sorry to muddy the waters. But I have older 191's. I never feel like they are unmanageable in the trees. The RES makes these super nimble. And, I have even had times when driving the tips through crud I wished I had another 5 cm out front. That's why, for our similar proportions, I recommend the 189's. Now, your snow may dictate that decision as well; I'm an inland NW maritime-ish powder skier. And, FWIW, the only reason I think I love the wrens at a 184 is because I have a custom +1 layer of carbon to stiffen them up. YMMV. Sounds like you have a good offer to try the 184's. If you're ever at Schweitzer you can try out my 191's...

  19. #3919
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    660
    Quote Originally Posted by Kootenai View Post
    Ahh, sorry to muddy the waters. But I have older 191's. I never feel like they are unmanageable in the trees. The RES makes these super nimble. And, I have even had times when driving the tips through crud I wished I had another 5 cm out front. That's why, for our similar proportions, I recommend the 189's. Now, your snow may dictate that decision as well; I'm an inland NW maritime-ish powder skier. And, FWIW, the only reason I think I love the wrens at a 184 is because I have a custom +1 layer of carbon to stiffen them up. YMMV. Sounds like you have a good offer to try the 184's. If you're ever at Schweitzer you can try out my 191's...

    thanks! I rode 189 Wren 108's at the Loveland demo day and they were a lot of work, too similar to my 190 Sick Day 114's. to be fair, I had ridden hard several days in a row, had been on the 114's all day at A Bay the day before, and was tired as hell. I'd really like something in between my way too soft and too centered Mordecais and the very long and stiff Sick Day 114's. Hopefully I can hop on those 184's, sounds like they might be the ticket.

  20. #3920
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Hillsburrito
    Posts
    2,747
    Quote Originally Posted by mattig View Post
    This is what I'm looking for, thanks.



    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    Counterpoint. I'm your size (and way radder) and have owned the 191, and 186. I would never think of adding another layer.
    Training for Alpental

  21. #3921
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    660
    Quote Originally Posted by PhiberAwptik View Post
    Counterpoint. I'm your size (and way radder) and have owned the 191, and 186. I would never think of adding another layer.

    Skiers are the only group of people I’ve ever met besides French soccer players that regularly tell other people how much better they are than them. Considering how arrogant French soccer players are, often out of all proportion to their skills, I wouldn’t take the comparison as a compliment.

  22. #3922
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Driving2VT
    Posts
    4,858
    Quote Originally Posted by nomad_games View Post
    Skiers are the only group of people I’ve ever met besides French soccer players that regularly tell other people how much better they are than them. Considering how arrogant French soccer players are, often out of all proportion to their skills, I wouldn’t take the comparison as a compliment.
    Turn on your sarcasm meter
    Uno mas

  23. #3923
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Irony is dead, apparently.

  24. #3924
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    1,924
    Relax... PA and I agree on this point. He was just reminding me.

    Counter-counterpoint: you love the k108s as a daily driver. I like skis like head monsters or my Kastle mx98s. In other words, I tend to like it a bit stiffer than the next guy.

    Plus, you MIGHT weigh 210 drenched in maple syrup, but I think I got 20lbs on you. My maple syrup weight is more like 230.

    All a bit moot until I can get on some 189s in a foot or two of tracked out mank and see if I feel like I need more. Sunday could be the day if on3p has a demo pair at the factory this weekend.

    Anyway, I'm sure stock layup would be fine, but maybe +1 would be slightly finer for me. If I'm going to spend 800 bucks on skis, I want them to be as dialed as possible.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  25. #3925
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,899
    Quote Originally Posted by mattig View Post
    Relax... PA and I agree on this point. He was just reminding me.

    Counter-counterpoint: you love the k108s as a daily driver. I like skis like head monsters or my Kastle mx98s. In other words, I tend to like it a bit stiffer than the next guy.

    Plus, you MIGHT weigh 210 drenched in maple syrup, but I think I got 20lbs on you. My maple syrup weight is more like 230.

    All a bit moot until I can get on some 189s in a foot or two of tracked out mank and see if I feel like I need more. Sunday could be the day if on3p has a demo pair at the factory this weekend.

    Anyway, I'm sure stock layup would be fine, but maybe +1 would be slightly finer for me. If I'm going to spend 800 bucks on skis, I want them to be as dialed as possible.

    Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
    You’re syrupy enough for the supergoat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •