I work in the industry and talk to shop owners, managers, wrenches and other non-retail industry folks every day. I have a different experience.
Most see them as an annoying bubble product being foist upon us by large industry players and we’re unsure of where and how this will all shake out. The market will ultimately decide, and the general feeing is that further cleaving the $5k+ bike market with another niche product which happens to be heavier, more complicated and lacking standardization and fraught with access issues is not a winning combo.
The dangers posed to overall mtb access are real and backlashes to E-bikes if/when existing mtb access is reduced because land managers don’t want to or can’t enforce fine toothed rules about motor classes/speeds/strengths, are noted by those in the industry I talk to regarding strategic business decisions.
Universal non-motorized trail access is out of the question, so it’s a matter of sorting out the clearest, easily enforceable rules and guidelines for usage. The default here is limiting them to motorized trails. I’m not sure why that is such an issue.
All those pros you mention would not be riding them if they were not given them for free.
Sent from my iPhone using
TGR Forums
Bookmarks