I put my 189 2018's on top of my 189 2012's at the line. They actually match up very closely, seems the 2018's have earlier and more tip rocker, slightly more camber and stiffer. I'm not very techie when it comes to skis and understanding all the technical. I'll say have not noticed the tips of my 189's ever. With the 2012's, although not really a problem, I had to be somewhat mindful of tips on firmer surfaces. They both seem equally pivotable/slashy thru trees and the such in soft snow. I agree with they handle variable conditions better, and I will have less of a decision on which ski for lesser snow days.
Since 2012 I had the Billy Goats with 186 Viciks as my more daily driver. I've really stirred the pot now because I'm not sure what to do. I get a little emotional about all this. 6 years of the BG/Vicik combo, some really good years. Not sure it can be beat. But who knows, the Wren's are looking pretty sweet.
Stiffer isn't always better. For a jibby ski, it's not better. For a charging ski, 1.5x or Aever makes more sense, especially for people over 200lbs. Standard flex can still charge pretty damn hard for 200lb individuals. I am just saying that the 19oz fiberglass might be a sweet option, that I might try now that I've tried standard and stiffer goats. I like both stiff skis, and soft skis, each have their purpose in my quiver.
BG's and Viciks are a great 2 ski quiver. One of the best IMO. The tychoons were fun skis too. 189 W108s are burlier than 186 viciks, but I would suspect the 184 Wrens to be more like the Vicik. W98s are on sale right now, and might be another option.
Ugh. I want some BGs.
Vicik/BG is my current most used combo. So dialed.
2019 coming soon according to their website, seems like store is open for dealers or whatever now, needs a password!
Anyone touring on standard layup Wren 98s?
two questions:
1. how does the flex on current BG's compare to a Nordica Enforcer 110?
2. is there any real difference between the 16/17 Wren 98's and the 17/18's?
Thanks
Why don't you go practice fallin' down? I'll be there in a minute.
I'm 5'9" and 155. I have 179 Wren 108s and when I was at Big Sky this winter those skis seemed custom made for that place. However, when back home at Stowe, and skiing tighter trails, especially in the woods, the Wrens wanted to run faster then I was comfortable with. I am most likely going to pick up a pair of 18/19 Kartel 96 for next season with the idea that the slightly narrower waist and tighter side cut and softer flex should make for a great east coast all around ski, especially in the trees. Seeing you got to try both the Wren 98 and the Kartel 98 at Smuggs, would you agree that the Kartel is simply quicker and easier for tighter East Coast conditions? Thanks
tighter radius and slightly stiffer
http://blistergearreview.com/feature...9-lineup-ep-12
I'm 5'11 165lbs without any gear on. I have wren 88(179), wren 98 tours(179) and veneer kartel 98' in 181. I wouldn't say that the kartel is quicker and it's the tail shape/rocker design that allows them to release easier. The kartel 98 allows you to have a more rear leaning stance while the wren likes to be skied with more forward pressure on the shins.
By the way, I would like to add a few comments on the Wren 108 though I think it's been covered pretty well. I'm 5'9" and 155 and past the 60 mark. I live in New England and mostly ski in Northern Vermont at Stowe. I go out west each year at least once, usually looking for good snow and bigger terrain. I have fun skiing just about any kind of condition whether it's groomed trails (known here as frozen granular), packed powder, crud, fresh powder, whatever. I'm not the best skier out there but I know how to roll my skis over and feel them bite and pop me out of a turn as well as making fairly quick smearing turns in the woods. I picked up the Wren 108 in 179 last year. I only have about a dozen days on them. I usually find myself driving them but you can also relax a little on them too if the conditions are good and you have room to let them run. As long as the snow is even somewhat soft and the skis can dig into it, they are pretty easy to turn and are also easy to break out of a turn, though they do prefer bigger turns over tighter turns. Skiing them out west, where I was often skiing steep terrain with lots of room to let these run, these skis were simply a blast. The tips easily get up and out of the snow, especially when it's chopped up or even wind loaded heavy stuff, and letting them go, having confidence in them and yourself made for an easy but exciting ride down the mountain. The more I skied them the more relaxed I got and the more confident I got. If I lived out west these could easily be my only pair of skis. Here in the east, where we often have hard frozen surfaces and the need to make tighter turns they can sometimes be a little more work, at least for me, then something like my 173 Bonnefide. Still, even here I like skiing them on a powder day, as long as I'm on the trails and they perform especially well once things cut all cut up.
No not for sale. They are a little too much for me in tight spots but I like them too much to part with them.
....
Last edited by gepmeow; 02-15-2019 at 10:02 PM.
Bookmarks