Check Out Our Shop
Page 615 of 625 FirstFirst ... 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 ... LastLast
Results 15,351 to 15,375 of 15621

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #15351
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    338
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    Or they figured another buyer would have a boot bigger than an elf and did him a favor? Lol


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Ayy 25.5 isn't that crazy. But them fitting 294 up to 310 kinda captures more of the population so you're kinda right hah. In any other scenario I'd sell these flat but it seems like they might be more valuable without multiple sets of holes so I'm leaving the clamps on for now if by some miracle they can work for someone who's looking for some unique new pow skis.

    I'm not sure if I should be upset with the shop or what (but it is unfortunate that pretzel is passing because of this issue)

  2. #15352
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Posts
    581
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    I wonder if this was a situation where they used a Pivot 2.0 jig on a 1.0 heelpiece?
    is the 2.0 and 1.0 not the same jig? 2.0 only has 4mm more adjustment total

  3. #15353
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,580
    Considering selling some 189 cm Steeple 102's w/ radicals and used skins if anyone is interested hit me up before I list em on GS. Probably looking around $300. Bought from kootenai a few years ago. I just need to thin the quiver out and it'd be cool to keep them in the family, previously owned by Norseman too.

    Here's his post from back then to explain:


    These are pry from my dead fucking hands skis..... except I have a backup...... so thinning.

    Much love for these in the BG world. 102 waist punches WELL Above its trim slender waist for amazing 3D turns. These have RES, they are indestructible ON3P construction and they have only seen powder.

    These are Norsemen’s skis and I will just link to his ad because he documented all the goods.

    The only improvements/degradations: the heel is now a radical instead of ST. Skins have been reglued. It now has 2 mounts, one for Norse (300? Bsl) and one for 325 Bsl. I put inserts in for the radical setup. I believe there is one spinner that one needs to be cautious. And, very slight base protrusions from the inserts.

    Skis, bindings, skins. 350.00 + ship from Sandpoint.


    See thread for details: FS: 189 ON3P Steeple 102 (14/15)
    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...d.php?t=310941

    Finally, I may be willing to ship flat and/or sell my other pair and keep this pair (a year newer, swiss cheesed, but epoxied, skewered and plugged) pm with interest

  4. #15354
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Quote Originally Posted by bearcub69 View Post
    is the 2.0 and 1.0 not the same jig? 2.0 only has 4mm more adjustment total
    Not sure. I read some comments in the Pivot 2.0 thread that lead me to believe that the 2.0 heel might be somewhat offset relative to 1.0 at the same BSL. Haven’t gotten my hands on anything yet to confirm or compare.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  5. #15355
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    973
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    Not sure. I read some comments in the Pivot 2.0 thread that lead me to believe that the 2.0 heel might be somewhat offset relative to 1.0 at the same BSL. Haven’t gotten my hands on anything yet to confirm or compare.
    I swapped a 1.0 heel to a 2.0. It’s the same pattern.

  6. #15356
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    I’m not talking about hole pattern, but heel position relative to mount line … it was this comment:

    Sounds like the opposite problem right?
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  7. #15357
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    973
    Quote Originally Posted by SchralphMacchio View Post
    I’m not talking about hole pattern, but heel position relative to mount line … it was this comment:

    Sounds like the opposite problem right?
    Ahhhhh interesting. I’ll have to look at mine when I get home.

  8. #15358
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Name Redacted View Post
    Considering selling some 189 cm Steeple 102's w/ radicals and used skins if anyone is interested hit me up before I list em on GS. Probably looking around $300. Bought from kootenai a few years ago. I just need to thin the quiver out and it'd be cool to keep them in the family, previously owned by Norseman too.

    Here's his post from back then to explain:
    .... my favorite touring ski of all time. So tempting...

  9. #15359
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    659
    Quote Originally Posted by Jvhowube View Post
    I honestly think they might just be too much ski for me.
    You know I thought the same thing, but just in the last week I think my 189 Asym BGs finally clicked with me. I think the design of the ski allows you to keep your weight at a place when skiing in certain types of conditions where on most other skis you wouldn't be able to. Requires it's actually.

    Sent from my SM-F741U1 using Tapatalk
    Last edited by lrn2swim; 01-03-2025 at 12:40 AM.

  10. #15360
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,580
    Quote Originally Posted by ASmileyFace View Post
    .... my favorite touring ski of all time. So tempting...
    Yeah, I like em. Haven't skied them a ton. Mainly just trying to raise funds to appease the SO. I'll be down your way in March and could bring them if they haven't sold.

  11. #15361
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,943
    Quote Originally Posted by Name Redacted View Post
    Yeah, I like em. Haven't skied them a ton. Mainly just trying to raise funds to appease the SO. I'll be down your way in March and could bring them if they haven't sold.
    I blew up my last pair in my accident. I'd need to move on from a pair of skis to justify it but If they haven't sold by the time you make it my way in March lets connect.

  12. #15362
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    at work
    Posts
    1,437
    Looking to move on from my Wren Ninety Eights (one eighty nine length) to something more hard snow oriented. Single mount for NTN freerides. In MN but headed to Breck 1/23-1/26. Gauging interest- $300. Posting here before GearSwap. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1735689980.710972.jpg 
Views:	180 
Size:	160.8 KB 
ID:	508885
    "Not all who wander are lost"

  13. #15363
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    644
    Thought I wasn't getting along with my BGs at the end of last season and was ready to put em on the chopping block, but some tip and tail detuning and a week in Jackson hole has brought the love back. So damn damp yet agile, and float so well.

  14. #15364
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    No one wants some cheap kartel 116s?

    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...ptons-and-more!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  15. #15365
    Join Date
    Apr 2024
    Posts
    23
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2166.jpg 
Views:	177 
Size:	1.14 MB 
ID:	509068

    Finally got out on my summer marketplace find BG116s this week. Oh my goodness, everything I’ve ever read about these is true. They took a few laps to figure out, but now that I’m dialed it’s truly mind blowing. Unreal how easy they are to throw sideways while still maintaining crazy stability through variable snow. As someone who’s prior profession involved a lot of riding around in armored vehicles, I feel like I’m back in one when I get on these; they crush anything you could come across and you barely feel it. Also insanely easy to air these out, they almost prefer to be off the snow. I was slightly worried about how little tail there is, quickly found it to be the most supportive tail I’ve ever skied. Hero ski describes these perfectly, they’re officially a cold-dead-hands ski after only 3 days.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  16. #15366
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,580
    Quote Originally Posted by snOwen View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2166.jpg 
Views:	177 
Size:	1.14 MB 
ID:	509068

    Finally got out on my summer marketplace find BG116s this week. Oh my goodness, everything I’ve ever read about these is true. They took a few laps to figure out, but now that I’m dialed it’s truly mind blowing. Unreal how easy they are to throw sideways while still maintaining crazy stability through variable snow. As someone who’s prior profession involved a lot of riding around in armored vehicles, I feel like I’m back in one when I get on these; they crush anything you could come across and you barely feel it. Also insanely easy to air these out, they almost prefer to be off the snow. I was slightly worried about how little tail there is, quickly found it to be the most supportive tail I’ve ever skied. Hero ski describes these perfectly, they’re officially a cold-dead-hands ski after only 3 days.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I remember falling in love with those exact skis about three turns in.

  17. #15367
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    And people think we are just being nostalgic about the old BG’s. They really are something special.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  18. #15368
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,580
    Skied mine this weekend.

  19. #15369
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    973

    ON3P SKIS Discussion


    Skied the ASYMs this past week. They really are different in the best way. With that I have some 187s for sale. Only need one BG. Well, maybe not.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  20. #15370
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,967
    Quote Originally Posted by snOwen View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2166.jpg 
Views:	177 
Size:	1.14 MB 
ID:	509068

    Finally got out on my summer marketplace find BG116s this week. Oh my goodness, everything I’ve ever read about these is true. They took a few laps to figure out, but now that I’m dialed it’s truly mind blowing. Unreal how easy they are to throw sideways while still maintaining crazy stability through variable snow. As someone who’s prior profession involved a lot of riding around in armored vehicles, I feel like I’m back in one when I get on these; they crush anything you could come across and you barely feel it. Also insanely easy to air these out, they almost prefer to be off the snow. I was slightly worried about how little tail there is, quickly found it to be the most supportive tail I’ve ever skied. Hero ski describes these perfectly, they’re officially a cold-dead-hands ski after only 3 days.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Now those are a find! Congrats on joining the club!

  21. #15371
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Cascades
    Posts
    688
    Going to Japan 2nd week of Feb. Mostly lifts and side country, but want the ability to skin.
    Was planning to bring my 2023 BGT118s - but 2nd guessing if it's the right tool for the job. Anyone with BG experience in japan?

  22. #15372
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    a quick Jeff100ripper rocker vs jeff108 comparison:

    The ripper rocker def makes a difference re hard snow prowess. My proto j100rr pair is a bit too soft to really make it count though, so I decided to move them on. BO98s ski funky, icey snow a fair bit more competently, both are awesome on soft groomers. I will recommend these for people who prioritize butterability, if not I would suggest going custom stiffer (unless my protos are softer than stock - Iggy / ON3P can correct me if so).

    J108s are def an improvement on hard snow compared to my late kartel108s. They float tremenduously well and are very loose yet supportive. They are def more softer snow specific over having the same type of hard snow prowess as say Rossi SF110s, but float significantly better. I will happily recommend these to skiers prioritizing soft snow prowess in a progressively mounted ski that floats better than they ought to - they are fantastic, even if they are not the quite allround enough for me to be my daily driver.

  23. #15373
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    Quote Originally Posted by TripleT View Post
    Going to Japan 2nd week of Feb. Mostly lifts and side country, but want the ability to skin.
    Was planning to bring my 2023 BGT118s - but 2nd guessing if it's the right tool for the job. Anyone with BG experience in japan?
    Took my goats with shifts in 2020, loved them!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  24. #15374
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,180
    Quote Originally Posted by TripleT View Post
    Going to Japan 2nd week of Feb. Mostly lifts and side country, but want the ability to skin.
    Was planning to bring my 2023 BGT118s - but 2nd guessing if it's the right tool for the job. Anyone with BG experience in japan?
    Yes. They ruled. Skied goats only all week. Lots of offers to try other skis. Declined them all.
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  25. #15375
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    11
    I now have 6 days at Revy on Woodsman 92-186 ripper extra stiff. Coming from 10yrs on Viciks, BGs, various Wrens. I'm.... confused. On steeps/bumps/real terrain, the Woodrippers are phenomenal, basically a super agile Wren, exactly what I wanted. I cannot figure them out on groomers. On steep corduroy I can't slalom them, can't find a natural turning radius, can't lay them over into a proper carve, may as well be skiing 2x6s at a 40mph speed limit. On low angle or even slightly slick groomers they will randomly bite into a high radius 'turn' that is uncomfortably hard to break. It kinda reminds me of how my old 2013 BGs would lock into an absurdly large like 50m turn, except the BG was stable in that turn and the Woodripper is squirrely AF.

    Again, my basis of comparison is Wrens, most recently 2021 Wren 102 TIs and 2018 Wren 108s. On groomers, the 108s are great for what they are, and the TIs are imo legitimately great - last year I demoed some of those Bode Miller carving skis everyone was presumably paid to say nice things about, and I sincerely prefer the Wren TIs on groomers because they are so stable at speed.

    I plan to get them re-tuned, but any other ideas what is going on here? Is the woodsman THAT different from the Wren? Should I just shut up and stop humoring my wife with groomer laps?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •