Check Out Our Shop
Page 13 of 39 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 970

Thread: The TGR Skinny Ski Ski Tourers' Refuge Thread

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Amherst MA & Twin Mtn NH
    Posts
    4,723
    Quote Originally Posted by teledad View Post
    Broke the boa cable on my Alien RS boots. Fortunately I have a pair of F1 LTs with the same BSL since I have a skimo race next weekend. Assuming I can order a new cable from Scarpa, is this replaceable by mere mortals? Looks like I’ll need a small Torx driver to get the dial off?
    My recollection is that:
    1. This was a frequent problem with the earlier production of that model.
    2. Scarpa was replacing it for free.
    3. Replacing it yourself is tricky b/c of the diameters involved.
    Mo' skimo here: NE Rando Race Series

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    617
    Volkl Rise Above 88 in 170 is tempting at $425 US... https://www.corbetts.com/2022-volkl-rise-above-88-skis/

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    409
    Quote Originally Posted by CirqueScaler View Post
    Volkl Rise Above 88 in 170 is tempting at $425 US... https://www.corbetts.com/2022-volkl-rise-above-88-skis/
    Backland 78 (non-UL version) for CAD250 for anyone looking to try out skimo or a solid sping mission ski on the same site.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    617
    Great deal. I skied the non-UL 78s last year for 65 days and loved them. Only complaint was the short radius on the 163.

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    409
    Yeah I had the Backland Descenders which I think is still the same ski, like 1200g in the 170. Great ski, I just didn’t like being locked into pendulum turns with the short radius.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SnoqWA
    Posts
    2,685
    I am lazy (or inflexible?) and don't like to have to bend over and grab the heelpiece by hand to switch between riser modes. For this reason, I don't really like my ATK RT 2.0 bindings.

    What are some of the lighter bindings out there that can be fully actuated by poles? G3 zed? I mostly like my Ions on my winter setup.

    Pole switching between ski mode, low, med, high risers (like Ions) would be great.
    Pole switching between ski mode, med, and high risers would be acceptable.
    Pole switching between only ski mode and medium riser like my RT 2.0s doesn't work for me.

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by bfree View Post
    I am lazy (or inflexible?) and don't like to have to bend over and grab the heelpiece by hand to switch between riser modes. For this reason, I don't really like my ATK RT 2.0 bindings.

    What are some of the lighter bindings out there that can be fully actuated by poles? G3 zed? I mostly like my Ions on my winter setup.

    Pole switching between ski mode, low, med, high risers (like Ions) would be great.
    Pole switching between ski mode, med, and high risers would be acceptable.
    Pole switching between only ski mode and medium riser like my RT 2.0s doesn't work for me.
    Salomon MTN and ATK Raider both have 2 riser heights that you can use your pole to flip directly over the heel pins without ever rotating the heel piece. I believe the MTN is slightly lighter (brakeless version) but the ATK risers are magnetized and much easier to operate. Both are lighter than the Zed.

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    409
    Alpinist heels can be turned with the pole. And of course the Dynafit Speed Turn.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Summit Park UT
    Posts
    1,163
    I have older Raiders, new C Raiders, and MTNs. Without brakes the C Raiders are the lightest, but only by like 20g or so. But their heel risers are awesome (same as the normal Raiders). Only thing that might be better on the MTNs is they are probably a bit easier to step into the toe, with the little toe stopper assist thing-a-ma-jig. And they're cheaper I think.

  10. #310
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Side WA
    Posts
    623
    I just ordered some Hagan Boost 93 x 184 for a screaming deal (Hagan hooked it up!) and some ATK Trofeo Plus 10 bindings from Telemark-Pyrenees that I'll report back on after a few volcanos.

  11. #311
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Donner Summit
    Posts
    1,272
    Anyone tried the Pomoca Race Pro Grip skins in warm weather? Had a race last weekend in slushy conditions (late afternoon, 50F temps), on the steeper climbs I was having to paperboy to avoid slipping. Wondering if grippier skins would help. I was running Colltex PDGs.

  12. #312
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    54
    Can anyone recommend a touring pack in the ~35 liter size that fits long torsos well? I have a cirque 35 in size M/L and the back is I think too short for me. Touring with it makes my back and shoulders uncomfortable quickly. I have a REI flash 55 backpacking pack in L that fits great and is painless even with heavier loads and long days. I'm fine with no airbag. Good ski carry and axe carry options is a plus.

  13. #313
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by Anachronist View Post
    Can anyone recommend a touring pack in the ~35 liter size that fits long torsos well? I have a cirque 35 in size M/L and the back is I think too short for me. Touring with it makes my back and shoulders uncomfortable quickly. I have a REI flash 55 backpacking pack in L that fits great and is painless even with heavier loads and long days. I'm fine with no airbag. Good ski carry and axe carry options is a plus.
    I have an 18.5" torso which is usually a medium or S/M and the BD M/L packs fit me, which makes me think they run small. The Cirque shoulder straps are also super thin and barely padded so that could contribute to the discomfort. Mystery Ranch makes L/XL size packs which are huge but not skinny ski style.

  14. #314
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Side WA
    Posts
    623
    Exped has nice roll-top options in a variety of sizes. I'm using the Black Ice 30 as my ski pack this year and last.

  15. #315
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    I have an 18.5" torso which is usually a medium or S/M and the BD M/L packs fit me, which makes me think they run small. The Cirque shoulder straps are also super thin and barely padded so that could contribute to the discomfort. Mystery Ranch makes L/XL size packs which are huge but not skinny ski style.
    MR is one I hadn't looked at yet, thanks. And apparently they have a custom sizing program too, presumably for $$$$. At this point I'm game to give up some ounces on my back for a comfortable fit. Exped looks interesting as well. Probably the smart move is going somewhere that has some of these packs and just trying them on.

  16. #316
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    409

    The TGR Skinny Ski Ski Tourers' Refuge Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Anachronist View Post
    Probably the smart move is going somewhere that has some of these packs and just trying them on.
    Yes, good probability that anyone carrying MR will have staff that’s trained in pack fitting that will help get you fit right, which is worth pounds IMO


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by dub_xion; 04-07-2022 at 12:32 PM.

  17. #317
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by Anachronist View Post
    MR is one I hadn't looked at yet, thanks. And apparently they have a custom sizing program too, presumably for $$$$. At this point I'm game to give up some ounces on my back for a comfortable fit. Exped looks interesting as well. Probably the smart move is going somewhere that has some of these packs and just trying them on.
    Its hard to find a good place to try on a bunch of touring packs in the same spot. My favorite current offerings are the Mammut Spindrift and Blue Ice Firecrest and I don't know of any brick and mortar shops selling those. I know Skimo Co and many other retailers offer free returns, life is a lot easier when you just order 7 or 8 things and just return all but one.

  18. #318
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    866
    The best touring pack I've ever used is the current MR in terms of fit and functionality. It is heavy though, and not super simple so YMMV

  19. #319
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Breckenridge
    Posts
    726
    Cross posting here from the Dalbello thread:

    I'm considering the Quantum Asolo Factory or Quantum Lite to replace a pair of Alien 1.0 boots.

    Reason I want to switch is the Alien rubs the ankle bone on the inside of the ankle on both my feet. It gets quite sensitive and bruised. I read the review here https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/revie...-asolo-factory which says the liner is relatively thick around the ankle and leg which I am hoping would help me.

    I wear a 26.0 Alien 1.0(I couldn't make a 25.0 shell fit work on a Alien RS) and used to wear a 25.5 Sportiva Sytron.
    Hearing all the feedback about sizing I figure the 26.5 would be the correct size to try first.

    I'm looking to have the same downhill performance as the Alien 1.0 with more comfort and willing to sacrifice a little weight. I'd like to keep uphill performance as good as possible other than the added 200g.

    Any feedback on the Lite version? Does it lose downhill performance? Is the liner too thin, reducing comfort?

    It seems as though the QLS has seen some durability issues, how difficult is it to get replacement parts and the cost for those? I'm used to free replacement BOA laces and am comfortable replacing them.

    I also considered the F1 LT, but I don't care for the velcro closure on the F1 and also just saw some complaints for the same issue I have on the Alien 1.0 here: https://skimo.co/scarpa-f1-lt-boots

  20. #320
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    I tried on the Quantum Asolo Factor, felt like the liner was pretty thin, standard for boots in this class. The QAF I think is the lightest "touring boot" currently available, as in not marketed towards skimo racing. Lots of people here said that they run small and are short. I felt like the 27.5 was long enough for me, and I'm 27.5 in every brand (some brands like Scarpa are too short for me in 27.5). I ultimately passed on them because they have a pretty soft flex and too much volume in the heel. You could probably take up some heel volume with a thicker liner, and folks in the Dalbello thread have had success doing that. If I find a cheap late season QAF deal I might get on it because I like the race-style transitions, super light weight and acceptable fit.

  21. #321
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Donner Summit
    Posts
    1,272
    Quote Originally Posted by timmaio View Post
    I also considered the F1 LT, but I don't care for the velcro closure on the F1 and also just saw some complaints for the same issue I have on the Alien 1.0 here: https://skimo.co/scarpa-f1-lt-boots
    Can't comment on the ankle fit (I haven't noticed an issue there but everyone is different) but for the velcro strap issue frorider's invention might be of interest:
    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...19#post6513719
    https://www.wildsnow.com/30991/elega...-the-strapoff/

  22. #322
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Breckenridge
    Posts
    726
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    I tried on the Quantum Asolo Factor, felt like the liner was pretty thin, standard for boots in this class. The QAF I think is the lightest "touring boot" currently available, as in not marketed towards skimo racing. Lots of people here said that they run small and are short. I felt like the 27.5 was long enough for me, and I'm 27.5 in every brand (some brands like Scarpa are too short for me in 27.5). I ultimately passed on them because they have a pretty soft flex and too much volume in the heel. You could probably take up some heel volume with a thicker liner, and folks in the Dalbello thread have had success doing that. If I find a cheap late season QAF deal I might get on it because I like the race-style transitions, super light weight and acceptable fit.
    Good to know your thoughts. You say they felt too soft. What are you comparing that to? I like the stiffness of the Alien 1.0(stiffer than the Sytron) and want to ensure I don't lose that in changing boots.

    How did you like the Quick Lacing System?

    I want a ski mountaineering boot first and foremost. Light enough to go fast, agile enough to handle rocks and crampons well and stiff enough to ski 45*+ terrain on light 85 underfoot skis.

    They are 650 right now, part of why I'm considering them.

  23. #323
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Breckenridge
    Posts
    726
    Quote Originally Posted by teledad View Post
    Can't comment on the ankle fit (I haven't noticed an issue there but everyone is different) but for the velcro strap issue frorider's invention might be of interest:
    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...19#post6513719
    https://www.wildsnow.com/30991/elega...-the-strapoff/
    My problem is my chicken legs, not with continual adjustment. The design on the F1 requires too much force to close and eventually wore the velcro holding power requiring a new strap. I don't think this mod fixes that problem

  24. #324
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by timmaio View Post
    Good to know your thoughts. You say they felt too soft. What are you comparing that to? I like the stiffness of the Alien 1.0(stiffer than the Sytron) and want to ensure I don't lose that in changing boots.

    How did you like the Quick Lacing System?

    I want a ski mountaineering boot first and foremost. Light enough to go fast, agile enough to handle rocks and crampons well and stiff enough to ski 45*+ terrain on light 85 underfoot skis.

    They are 650 right now, part of why I'm considering them.
    They are pretty soft. I've tried on the Sytron as well a while back and they are probably similar to the QAF. I've tried on the Alien 1.0 and its a lot stiffer. I haven't skied either one so can only comment on carpet feel. I have a friend who skis the QAF with ZG95 and likes them, but he demoed an F1 LT earlier this season and says the Scarpas have more power.

    The QLS is kind of junk. My friend broke his earlier this season, and they don't offer replacement parts. Luckily he was able to get a brand new pair of replacement boots from warranty and that pair is still going strong. It just feels clunky and less refined than boa.

    I bought a pair online for something like $350 or $400 brand new in the fall. Ended up getting rid of them instead of skiing them but prices lower than 650 can be found.

    I also have chicken legs and haven't had issues with the velcro strap boots I've used (Roxa RX, F1 LT, and Skorpius) other than just being annoying to have to tighten at every transition (frorider's mod doesn't work for me because I run the straps so tight). I found that the fixed leg tightness settings on the Sytron weren't nearly enough for me even on the tightest setting.

    Have you tried the Pierre Gignoux Mtn? Sounds like you're the perfect customer for them

  25. #325
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Breckenridge
    Posts
    726
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    They are pretty soft. I've tried on the Sytron as well a while back and they are probably similar to the QAF. I've tried on the Alien 1.0 and its a lot stiffer. I haven't skied either one so can only comment on carpet feel. I have a friend who skis the QAF with ZG95 and likes them, but he demoed an F1 LT earlier this season and says the Scarpas have more power.

    The QLS is kind of junk. My friend broke his earlier this season, and they don't offer replacement parts. Luckily he was able to get a brand new pair of replacement boots from warranty and that pair is still going strong. It just feels clunky and less refined than boa.

    I bought a pair online for something like $350 or $400 brand new in the fall. Ended up getting rid of them instead of skiing them but prices lower than 650 can be found.

    I also have chicken legs and haven't had issues with the velcro strap boots I've used (Roxa RX, F1 LT, and Skorpius) other than just being annoying to have to tighten at every transition (frorider's mod doesn't work for me because I run the straps so tight). I found that the fixed leg tightness settings on the Sytron weren't nearly enough for me even on the tightest setting.

    Have you tried the Pierre Gignoux Mtn? Sounds like you're the perfect customer for them
    Great thoughts, thanks.

    That's disappointing to hear about the stiffness. I don't think I can drop back to the Sytron level of performance.

    Again disappointing that they warrantied a boot over the QLS breaking. I have replaced many BOA and expect the boot to last at least 3 BOA replacements. It's also something I carry in my repair kit on multi day tours. A significant liability if it cannot be fixed in the field.

    I have considered the PG Mtn idly, but never seriously. I'll have to see if I can handle them next time I'm in the EU. I have spent plenty of time around full carbon boots(my wife races on sportiva's) and I know the performance is there but the lack of lower punching makes me nervous and I'm also reticent to drop that much coin without trying on first.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •