History clarifies the present. It's always been about the money (except for Carter). From 1998:
Republicans, Democrats, and China
Human rights used to be a Democratic concern. When Jimmy Carter tried to put the issue at the center of his foreign policy, Republicans charged that he was being woolly minded and naive. Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, who rose to fame as a critic of Carter’s human rights efforts, argued that pestering friendly regimes about their political prisoners played into the hands of the Communists, whose human rights records were invariably worse.
Even the Republican human rights concern about Communist regimes had one great exception: China. Partly because of China’s Cold War value as a rival of the Soviet Union, partly because Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger started the rapprochement, partly because the American business establishment has embraced China so enthusiastically, and partly for reasons that remain mysterious, the Republican Party has had a soft spot for the world’s largest Communist regime for almost three decades.
Some Republicans have tried to imply that the Chinese purchased the Clinton administration’s favor with illegal campaign cash. At this stage, it is still far from proved that anyone in the Clinton administration knew that the Democratic Party was getting money from China or that money had an influence on its policies. But if the Chinese did try to buy favor with the Democrats, it may have been because they already owned the Republicans. Not having seen a Democratic administration in a dozen years, they might well have been worried that the new one elected in 1992 would actually follow through on its rhetoric about human rights and democracy. With the Republicans, they understood there would be no deviation from Nixon’s policy of accommodation.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...and-china.html
They say the darkest night, happens just before the dawn.
https://youtu.be/bgGOcjbGtJo
sent from Utah.
sigless.
Important new data for 1,277 hospitalized patients from a 9.6M Kaiser Permanente cohort in CA/WA. Risk of ICU admission and death each tended to be higher among male than female patients, which is consistent with sex difference in other countries.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....12.20062943v1
![]()
I don't know if the Coronavirus is gonna kill me.
But if I have to spend another day with my wife and teenager daughter bickering over bullshit
I'm getting that van, heading to the nearest river and starting my life there immediately
Bunny Don't Surf
Have you seen a one armed man around here?
Jesus Hercules Christ
edit to add-I'm at work and their shit is finding me here.
Think my almost 18 YO needs to to find a new spot to hang her hat when she becomes an adult next month.
Coming of age in the time of Coronavirus.....
FUCK!
Bunny Don't Surf
Have you seen a one armed man around here?
Actual Zombies (lockdown protestors in OH)
vs
Fake Zombies
apologies to The Urban hermit on Twitter
www.apriliaforum.com
"If the road You followed brought you to this,of what use was the road"?
"I have no idea what I am talking about but would be happy to share my biased opinions as fact on the matter. "
Ottime
We've been empty nested since August, one kid in MT and one in UT. Was supposed to have a 10 day road trip starting March 15 to visit and ski with my kiddos. I'm sure we'd be complaining about how they do nothing to help if they were home since both the Mrs and I are still working full time, but damn I miss em right about now.
Move upside and let the man go through...
Man, living alone sounds better and better these days.
Good news for asthma sufferers, from NY Times, Asthma Is Absent Among Top Covid-19 Risk Factors, Early Data Shows
My youngest lives with us. Now that she is laid off, she is cleaning house, cooking us gourmet dinners, washing/grooming the two big dogs, just about anything to stay busy. Once they are adults, if you get lucky and they turned out ok, they are wonderful to be with. Hang in there guys with younger kids.
Never in U.S. history has the public chosen leadership this malevolent. The moral clarity of their decision is crystalline, particularly knowing how Trump will regard his slim margin as a “mandate” to do his worst. We’ve learned something about America that we didn’t know, or perhaps didn’t believe, and it’ll forever color our individual judgments of who and what we are.
Once we have the anti body test, can those who are deemed "immune" still act as vectors to transmit the virus?
In a person who's built up antibodies, do those antibodies just guard against reinfection while still allowing the body to host the virus? Or do they actively attack and kill any viral load that is detected?
Bookmarks