Check Out Our Shop
Page 238 of 291 FirstFirst ... 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 ... LastLast
Results 5,926 to 5,950 of 7256

Thread: Anyone have anything they'd like to rant about?

  1. #5926
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    24,133
    Not a rant, a question.

    I need new chainrings for a gravel bike. Ultegra 11x2 34/50 is currently the set up. I shopped around and damn those big rings are spendy. I found a 105 11x2 34/50 crankset for less than the cost of the replacement rings and ordered that. To the point of having to choose which size rings I wanted.


    Part Num 702868
    Shimano 105 FC-R7000 Crankset (175mm, 11-Speed, 50/34t, 110 BCD) Hollowtech Crank Army Hollowtech II Spindle Interface, Black
    $112.99
    Quantity 1




    Well, the crankset showed up yesterday and it is just that, a crankset with no rings.

    Am I an idiot?
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  2. #5927
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tahoe-ish
    Posts
    3,357
    You could maybe rant about it, since it does specify the ring sizes... I would maybe be a little leery of buying a "Crank Army", though. I'd return it if I were you.

    It would not be crazy to find a 105 crankset with rings for around $120, though. You could also find a GRX 600 CS with 46/30 rings that will fit your BB and offer much better ratios for off-pavement riding, assuming your FTP is not 450W.

    The bigger question is: why would you want 175mm? All of the cool kids are going 165 now, as shorter arms have proven more efficient for everyone regardless of height.
    ride bikes, climb, ski, travel, cook, work to fund former, repeat.

  3. #5928
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,120
    Quote Originally Posted by climberevan View Post
    You could maybe rant about it, since it does specify the ring sizes... I would maybe be a little leery of buying a "Crank Army", though. I'd return it if I were you.

    It would not be crazy to find a 105 crankset with rings for around $120, though. You could also find a GRX 600 CS with 46/30 rings that will fit your BB and offer much better ratios for off-pavement riding, assuming your FTP is not 450W.

    The bigger question is: why would you want 175mm? All of the cool kids are going 165 now, as shorter arms have proven more efficient for everyone regardless of height.
    If they call it a crankset, not crank arms, and if they have you choose tooth count, then you should expect to get rings.

    If someone is selling arms only, should be like this:

    https://www.jensonusa.com/Shimano-10...SABEgL_A_D_BwE

  4. #5929
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,744
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunion 2020 View Post
    Not a rant, a question.

    I need new chainrings for a gravel bike. Ultegra 11x2 34/50 is currently the set up. I shopped around and damn those big rings are spendy. I found a 105 11x2 34/50 crankset for less than the cost of the replacement rings and ordered that. To the point of having to choose which size rings I wanted.


    Part Num 702868
    Shimano 105 FC-R7000 Crankset (175mm, 11-Speed, 50/34t, 110 BCD) Hollowtech Crank Army Hollowtech II Spindle Interface, Black
    $112.99
    Quantity 1




    Well, the crankset showed up yesterday and it is just that, a crankset with no rings.

    Am I an idiot?
    Is that Ultegra crank part of the recall? If so, you might get a whole new crankset out of it, with rings.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  5. #5930
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    24,133
    Quote Originally Posted by climberevan View Post
    The bigger question is: why would you want 175mm? All of the cool kids are going 165 now, as shorter arms have proven more efficient for everyone regardless of height.
    Been riding 175s for a really long time, about 40 years. Never was very cool.

    Is that Ultegra crank part of the recall? If so, you might get a whole new crankset out of it, with rings.
    Was not aware of the recall. Yes they are listed as a part of the recall.

    https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/infor...ll-notice.html

    Time to go through Shimano. THIS IS WHY I FUCKING LOVE THIS PLACE!
    THX
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  6. #5931
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,744
    I have that same Ultegra crankset, same chainrings, on a supposed gravel bike too - - a GT Grade from around 2016 - - that has very poor tire clearance for a gravel bike. I don't use it as one though, I bought it to use as a road bike with upright geometry and hydraulic brakes.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  7. #5932
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    24,133
    ^^^ pretty much the same scenario. Bought this one from my best riding buddies widow after he died. This is a Giant Revolt. Real nice bike and fun to ride on all the farm roads around here that are rapidly getting paved.
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  8. #5933
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BC to CO
    Posts
    5,119
    I might have a set of chainrings, let me look today.
    Gawd I need to have a massive sale on TGR.

  9. #5934
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Missoula
    Posts
    2,187
    Also that is not a shimano part number. The cranks are available with or without rings. the "without rings" does retail for that amount.

    The shimano PN for the 175mm cranks with 50/34 rings and 175mm arms is IFCR7000EX04L, upc is 689228889057, and msrp is 166.99

    Personally i still ride 175 cranks because i'm tall and have long legs and don't really need or want my saddle to be even higher up- my cg is high enough. Especially consider a gravel/cx bike without a dropper- with 165 cranks my post is 10mm higher up and that's 10mm less clearance I have when cornering and standing up and descending and trying to absorb bumps and get low and back on descents. Today i was riding my hardtail with a rigid post (because still waiting on tools and parts from fox for the dropper) and yeah that post is tall enough.

  10. #5935
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    7,192
    Mynesweepers Valve Stem fail.
    Spent all last night fucking around getting a couple wheels set up. Whatever I did, I'd still fail the soapy water test with air coming out at the valve and at spoke holes. Re-taped, same problem. Finally changed out to an old CushCore valve and now have zero air loss. Since my testing wore me out, I left the tire overnight and most of today. When we decided to go for an afternoon ride, I just threw it on the bike without adding any sealant and all the air stayed where it was supposed to be. As far as I can tell, the rubber cone stopper on the Mynesweeper valve is a lot softer than the CushCore stopper and maybe just deforms too much when compressed.
    Gotta say, tubeless has been kicking my ass hard enough that I've been tempted to use tubes. I doubt I'll go that far, but the thought has certainly occurred to me multiple times. Instead, I'm more likely to go without inserts on front tires since at least then it's easier to keep pulling the tire off to fuck around with it.
    However many are in a shit ton.

  11. #5936
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tahoe-ish
    Posts
    3,357
    If I have time when setting up a wheel for the first time or when re-taping, I like to put some caulk around the stem. Let it cure for a few hours before airing up the tire. I believe it helps to ensure that the rubber cone area seals well.
    ride bikes, climb, ski, travel, cook, work to fund former, repeat.

  12. #5937
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    7,192
    I could get into that


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    However many are in a shit ton.

  13. #5938
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    I've used the E13 Quick Fill valves on mine and several other bikes. It's a really great idea and makes Stan's (why use any other brand?) refils way more cleaner and easier.
    https://www.ethirteen.com/products/q...l-plasma-valve
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  14. #5939
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,922
    Specialized putting out a sworks that has no cable routing, thus axs only. Scary precedent for me.

  15. #5940
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada1 View Post
    Specialized putting out a sworks that has no cable routing, thus axs only. Scary precedent for me.
    And file under "things not to rant about": no headset routing on any of the regular Epic or EE models. Kudos there.

  16. #5941
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada1 View Post
    Specialized putting out a sworks that has no cable routing, thus axs only. Scary precedent for me.
    Shimano better get their wireless shit together quick. Where Specialized goes, many others will follow.

    But yeah, agreed that this sucks.

  17. #5942
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Treading Water
    Posts
    7,192
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada1 View Post
    Specialized putting out a sworks that has no cable routing, thus axs only. Scary precedent for me.
    No brakes?
    However many are in a shit ton.

  18. #5943
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,922
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    And file under "things not to rant about": no headset routing on any of the regular Epic or EE models. Kudos there.
    agreed. I generally buy bikes in recent years based on where one of my kids has a pro-form, but have successfully avoided headset cable routing. That would be a deal breaker for me.

  19. #5944
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    Fuck Specialized.

    I'm sorry, but how can anyone that knows anything about the industry, and has a soul, support this company.
    They're well known for fucking over and intimidating their own dealers, they sue anyone who breaths anywhere near "their" intellectual property, they are all-in on any shitty technology if it cheapens their costs, and they're the king of cheap-ass-manufacturing.

    They are the backcountry.com of bike manufacturing.
    I don't care how cheap their bikes are or even if they work, there are tons of good bikes available out there. Why support THEM?!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  20. #5945
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    ^^^ After dealing with them directly over the last year+, I generally agree with you. I was hoping to be proven wrong about working with them, but they verified pretty quickly everything that I had pre-conceived notions about prior to the partnership. Their corporate employees just don't give a f*ck, and they certainly know how to treat people like shit.

    That said, they're so popular because their bikes are generally awesome (and priced pretty well), and they're widely available in most markets across the country. Most people don't care about how a company treats people/partners/suppliers/etc unfortunately, otherwise a majority of large corporations would be bankrupt.

  21. #5946
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Land of Brine Shrimp and Magic Underwear
    Posts
    7,048
    Just here to pile on Specialized. Fuck them and the horse they rode in on.
    There's nothing better than sliding down snow, flying through the air

  22. #5947
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    That said, they're so popular because their bikes are generally awesome (and priced pretty well), and they're widely available in most markets across the country.
    There are a shit-ton of good bike companies out there that do the same without being the skid-mark of the industry.
    I get a noob buying one but people that know better should just say no.
    My .02 (and rant)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  23. #5948
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,398
    I just bought a Specialsauce. I've never worked in the bike industry, but have heard negative things about them, so I've avoided buying in the past. It is undeniable that they make quality products.
    I have a friend who has worked for them for a long time and they've treated him well.
    The bike I bought was for commuting to work and it can play trail builder as well...Tero X. It was and is the ideal bike for me and I didn't see any other "bike" brands with this design. Plus my LBS sells them and I like to support those guys. They also sell SC mtn bikes which I ride. And SC is under a huge corporate umbrella now too, so who knows what they're like as a Corp.

    Got the thing on dirt yesterday for the first time to do some trail maintenance and it worked perfectly for me and it's been a great work and grocery store commuter. This is my first ebike...it has a kickstand too [emoji16]

  24. #5949
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    24,133
    Follow up. The Online shop I ordered the crankset from agreed that their listing was confusing, sent me a fed-ex return label and promptly credited back the charge to my card. My Ultegra crank is in a LBS being evaluated as a part of the recall. IMO even "if" it is replaced I will probably need to purchase at least a new 50T.

    So it goes. T-shirt weather here this weekend, going for a ride.
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  25. #5950
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    121
    NorCal, or at least the north bay, feels like kook central. I don’t know if it’s the good weather, less intimidating trails, or disposable income but in the PNW I never saw so many people completely out of their element or just straight up doing goofy stuff in the woods. On my ride today I almost got smoked by a dude on an enduro blasting full speed down a gravel climbing road, then saw a group of three fit 30-something guys on baller build e-bikes, and finally watched a poor dude on an XC hardtail try to carry his bike down a steep off-map loamer.

    Another mini rant is people taking a picture of a small ass tree across a trail and uploading a picture of it to trail forks. Could cut that thing with a hand saw in the time it took you to type.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •