ON3P SKIS Discussion

[Tailwind]

On this note, anyone have a pair of 110’s they’d like to sell? I have 114’s that are my favorite ski ever but they’re getting a bit worn down. I might try to find another set of 114’s but I’m curious about the 110.

Or does anyone have Narrow Wrens in a 189 length they’d sell?

Get the Wren 110 Pro. It kicks ass.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

[McShortyShorts]

I've been trying to buy a pair of wren 110s used and have had zero luck. Don't think many pairs are made and those that buy them know what they're getting, and don't sell

[CaliBrit]

Lazy post as I have been out of this thread a while. Anyone have the mount points for the woods 100 and 108? Interested to try a pair just wondering how they are set up. Looking at 186 in each.

[Brasso]

On this note, anyone have a pair of 110’s they’d like to sell? I have 114’s that are my favorite ski ever but they’re getting a bit worn down. I might try to find another set of 114’s but I’m curious about the 110.

Or does anyone have Narrow Wrens in a 189 length they’d sell?

I have Wren 108s in 189cm that I'd be willing to part with. Or did you want narrower?

[Sessiøn]

Lazy post as I have been out of this thread a while. Anyone have the mount points for the woods 100 and 108? Interested to try a pair just wondering how they are set up. Looking at 186 in each.

-8.5

[K1mJ0ngTr1ll]

Lazy post as I have been out of this thread a while. Anyone have the mount points for the woods 100 and 108? Interested to try a pair just wondering how they are set up. Looking at 186 in each.

Go into the custom page and scroll down. Has all the goods you need.

[CaliBrit]

Go into the custom page and scroll down. Has all the goods you need.

Thanks!

[mn_teleswede]

I have Wren 108s in 189cm that I'd be willing to part with. Or did you want narrower?

PM’d

[Marko888]

So I take it the new WD 108 is a good amount less ski than the OG


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

Note mine are 181’s, custom soft layup. The std layup is going to be more burly.

[Tailwind]

Ehhh a bit torn. I’m sure they’re sweet but I think I’ll wait to find some 96’s or 102’s to compliment my 114’s (or 110’s if they ever show up used).

I have Wren 108s in 189cm that I'd be willing to part with. Or did you want narrower?

[Brasso]

Ehhh a bit torn. I’m sure they’re sweet but I think I’ll wait to find some 96’s or 102’s to compliment my 114’s (or 110’s if they ever show up used).

No worries at all, I am still feeling it out. I have a few pairs I've been lazy about selling because the season hasn't provided proper time for me to get a farewell day in on them.

[gujodz@gmail.com]

Has anyone here spent much time on the Tour layup inbounds? Considering mounting shifts on some Woodsman 100 Tours to dual duty as a lowtide setup but will go with tech bindings if its gonna be suboptimal in the resort anyways. DD is some woods 110s in standard layup

[Pnwtrees]

Anyone have mount advice for the Jeffrey 100?

I wanted Woodmans, but they don’t make them short enough this year. It was suggested to me to buy the Jeffs and mount them -1. The mount point for my size (161) is -3, so I have them at -4 now. Does anyone run them mounted further back, or am I screwing them up by mounting back from their mount point in the first place?

I can’t figure the ski out…where it wants my weight, or where it carves. Usually after a single run on new skis I understand them.

Anyone a Jeff whisperer?

[kid-kapow]

Has anyone here spent much time on the Tour layup inbounds? Considering mounting shifts on some Woodsman 100 Tours to dual duty as a lowtide setup but will go with tech bindings if its gonna be suboptimal in the resort anyways. DD is some woods 110s in standard layup

sure, that could work - as long as you take into consideration that the tour flex is rounder and made to excel in soft snow - not on hard snow.

and yeah, ive skied both bg108tours and wd108tours inbounds, both skied fine if much like what they are, softer light touring versions.

So suboptimal depends on what you want them to do. Low tide slayers? nope. Narrower soft snow skis that skis hard snow and variable snow fine - sure. Charger -no.

i would go for the resort layup with shifts for a very good 50/50 setup, the extra grams are worth it for the extra prowess going down. The stock version is still fairly light, and you could just ask for the lightest pair thay have on hand - it will be lighter than the stated weight, yet ski better in variable and icy conditions than the tour.

Anyone a Jeff whisperer?

don't try to drive them through the tips, but through the center for the ski (so pressure more from the center of the foot and down riding the sidecut, not balls of your feet bending them hard) and pivot/slarve them more around. Jeffs should be dead easy to ski as long as you ski them like the progressive, playful skis that they are.

i doubt remounting them would change them in a significant way, just make it more of whatever - so back, stronger tails, forward looser. You will still need to drive them the same way if you go back, so you might as well try to figure them out where you are at.

[PNW-skier78]

Has anyone here spent much time on the Tour layup inbounds? Considering mounting shifts on some Woodsman 100 Tours to dual duty as a lowtide setup but will go with tech bindings if its gonna be suboptimal in the resort anyways. DD is some woods 110s in standard layup

I 2nd the 50/50 layup. I have a the BG110 tour and it is great but a little light for resort chop.


Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

[grinch]

Im curious on 50/50 lay ups. My bg 110tour w raiders are great touring ski but too light inbounds. My old steeples ripped inbounds with tech bindings on them but weren't near as light as the current 110 tours

Sent from my SM-A536W using TGR Forums mobile app

[TripleT]

Huh^ this is a little counter to my experience. Granted it was just one day, but I was shocked at how good my bgt118s did in resort chop. I had them on my feet as we were heading out the gates, but ending up ripping laps for hours as we kept finding good inbounds snow pockets. I kept calling them a cheat code. But then maybe I just don’t rip hard enough?

[grinch]

I've probably skied them inbounds 4 or 5 times. I adapt a bit and theyre better than some ultra lights in bounds ive had but comparing them to stock lay up bg's or even steeples is night and day. Im not a skinny ski guy and prefer more surfy than edgy feel and my mfree 99's are my skinniest ski and i'll gladly take those inbounds if its chop. If im not crossing turns no matter what the pow condition is, wind pressed, skiable crust, heavy , light, ill take the 110tours

Sent from my SM-A536W using TGR Forums mobile app

[MNazWIcoWA]

Anyone interested in trading their wider 186cm Jeffrey/Kartels for the 108/110 widths? I have a pair of Kartel 108s in great shape and some very minty Jeffrey 110s, both in 186cm.

You looking at selling your Jeff 110s?

[cocoapuff]

Yup, PM'd ya

[Muggydude]

My BG108 Tour layup are nice in soft snow. They do chatter and get deflected more than I’d like in resort chop and icey patches, but they’re certainly skiable.

I honestly think the tour layup could be fine for a ski you’d mainly plan to use on storm and pow days. If you’re a lighter guy they could be a bit more versatile too. Beyond that they suffer and aren’t my favorite inbounds.

So something like a BG 118 Tour I’d use with shifts or inserts for resort pow days and backcountry. Particularly in the Rockies. I have a pair of Veneer UL Praxis Kusalas I use exactly that way for split duty, because on a fat ski I like the weight savings and am rarely skiing hard chunder, chop, and icey stuff

[MHSP1497]

Rode my Jeffrey 118’s in a little bit of fresh over a VERY hard base. The upper mountain had better snow, and in the stashes of fresh I found, they were everything I’d hoped and more. They have the suspension, cruise over everything in their way feel of the Caylor, but at a lighter weight and easier swing. All this goodness is tempered by how much work they are in heavier wet snow and icy groomers. Wrong skis for the day, should’ve been out on either my Jeffrey 108’s or my wife Line Blade’s. I did get to ride the lift with one of the ski builders (Andy?). Cool dude, we had a good chat.

[MoeSnow]

Rode my Jeffrey 118’s in a little bit of fresh over a VERY hard base. The upper mountain had better snow, and in the stashes of fresh I found, they were everything I’d hoped and more. They have the suspension, cruise over everything in their way feel of the Caylor, but at a lighter weight and easier swing. All this goodness is tempered by how much work they are in heavier wet snow and icy groomers. Wrong skis for the day, should’ve been out on either my Jeffrey 108’s or my wife Line Blade’s. I did get to ride the lift with one of the ski builders (Andy?). Cool dude, we had a good chat.

Curious to hear why you don’t like 118s in heavy wet snow. Mine do fine. As a rule I bring my Wren 98s unless it’s boot-top powder.

Still loving the Wren 98 BTW. Can charge hard and playful enough to do some lower-speed 180s and swing weight is light enough that grabs are still easy. Also skis switch surprisingly well. Cannot recommended them enough, especially on a good deal.

[Sessiøn]

Curious to hear why you don’t like 118s in heavy wet snow. Mine do fine. As a rule I bring my Wren 98s unless it’s boot-top powder.

Still loving the Wren 98 BTW. Can charge hard and playful enough to do some lower-speed 180s and swing weight is light enough that grabs are still easy. Also skis switch surprisingly well. Cannot recommended them enough, especially on a good deal.

It might be a lower angle Timberline thing.

Can't wait to get some fresh 118's with a never before seen topsheet, hopefully before the storm on thursday. If not I know my 110's still crush.

[MoeSnow]

It might be a lower angle Timberline thing.

Can't wait to get some fresh 118's with a never before seen topsheet, hopefully before the storm on thursday. If not I know my 110's still crush.

Gonna need to see pics of those top sheets whenever you decide to bust them out. For science.