Oh the ironing
I thought cementhead was the only hypocrite who could stick his foot in his mouth that fast/bravo. Did you disinfect first?
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
Oh the ironing
I thought cementhead was the only hypocrite who could stick his foot in his mouth that fast/bravo. Did you disinfect first?
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
Maybe there was more to the WH meeting discussed then we know between dump and cuomo. Kompromat is always a possibility/takes off tinfoil hat
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
Pretty sure he gargles with both. Its very confusing
NTTIAWWT
Sent from my SM-G950W using TGR Forums mobile app
Can we stop this bs toxicity?
Please.
Is it radix panax notoginseng? - splat
This is like hanging yourself but the rope breaks. - DTM
Dude Listen to mtm. He's a marriage counselor at burning man. - subtle plague
No you're a moron!
Few months, whatever. My point was mainly for basinbeaters freaked out wife. Just sit back, isolate and chill. Maybe stop reading this ridiculous thread.
Ok, you are moran too. Never adding much except the opportunity to pile on the snark or lame joke.
I'll set up a chair for you and bmills. 2 meters apart of course. Byob.
Sent from my SM-A505FN using Tapatalk
Day 37, the maggots turned on each other.
Oh wait, that’s every day.
Carry on
watch out for snakes
Last edited by SB; 03-18-2020 at 05:53 AM.
watch out for snakes
I'm starting to wonder if you're being serious with these repeat posts and linking to yourself, but just in case you are, here's a description of airborne particle issues that seems pertinent. From https://www.bode-science-center.com/...et-nuclei.html
Fundamental to the argument for masks, particularly iceman's point about putting them on the infected, is the difference between those droplets and the ones from a sneeze:Airborne droplet nuclei develop when the fluid of pathogenic droplets (1-5 µm in size; micrometre = one-thousandth of a millimetre) evaporates. They are so small and light they may remain suspended in the air for several hours. Thus, they may also infect persons entering a room which has been left by a patient long ago. Also, airborne droplet nuclei can be widely dispersed by air currents.
Masks raise humidity (which helps keep the large droplets from evaporating) and cut velocity (which reduces the spread radius). Time to bust out the Sneffles again.Direct spread of pathogens via aerosols. The droplets, which have a diameter of 100 µm to 2 mm, are aerosolised through sneezing, speaking or coughing. As these droplets cannot float through the air for a longer time, they only pose a risk to contact persons at a distance of 1-2 metres to the patient.
Wuhan Flu might be the sweet spot. Local without being nationalistic
Or “Covid”
But Trump wants to deflect responsibility and point the finger at someone to make them the scapegoat
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 17.
A novel human coronavirus thatis now named severe acute respiratory syndromecoronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (formerly called HCoV19) emerged in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 andis now causing a pandemic.1 We analyzed theaerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 andcompared it with SARS-CoV-1, the most closelyrelated human coronavirus.2
We evaluated the stability of SARS-CoV-2 andSARS-CoV-1 in aerosols and on various surfacesand estimated their decay rates using a Bayesianregression model (see the Methods section in theSupplementary Appendix, available with the fulltext of this letter at NEJM.org). SARS-CoV-2nCoV-WA1-2020 (MN985325.1) and SARS-CoV-1Tor2 (AY274119.3) were the strains used. Aerosols (<5 μm) containing SARS-CoV-2 (105.25 50%tissue-culture infectious dose [TCID50] per milliliter) or SARS-CoV-1 (106.75-7.00 TCID50 per milliliter)were generated with the use of a three-jet Collison nebulizer and fed into a Goldberg drum tocreate an aerosolized environment. The inoculum resulted in cycle-threshold values between20 and 22, similar to those observed in samplesobtained from the upper and lower respiratorytract in humans.
Our data consisted of 10 experimental conditions involving two viruses (SARS-CoV-2 andSARS-CoV-1) in five environmental conditions(aerosols, plastic, stainless steel, copper, and cardboard). All experimental measurements are reported as means across three replicates.
SARS-CoV-2 remained viable in aerosolsthroughout the duration of our experiment(3 hours), with a reduction in infectious titer from103.5 to 102.7 TCID50 per liter of air. This reductionwas similar to that observed with SARS-CoV-1,from 104.3 to 103.5 TCID50 per milliliter (Fig. 1A).
SARS-CoV-2 was more stable on plastic andstainless steel than on copper and cardboard, andviable virus was detected up to 72 hours after application to these surfaces (Fig. 1A), althoughthe virus titer was greatly reduced (from 103.7 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter of medium after 72 hourson plastic and from 103.7 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter after 48 hours on stainless steel). The stability kinetics of SARS-CoV-1 were similar (from103.4 to 100.7 TCID50 per milliliter after 72 hourson plastic and from 103.6 to 100.6 TCID50 per milliliter after 48 hours on stainless steel). On copper,no viable SARS-CoV-2 was measured after 4 hoursand no viable SARS-CoV-1 was measured after8 hours. On cardboard, no viable SARS-CoV-2 wasmeasured after 24 hours and no viable SARS-CoV-1 was measured after 8 hours (Fig. 1A).
Sars-CoV-2 particles are ~125 nM, large side for viruses.
Move upside and let the man go through...
Mofro, I know you're not an epidemiologist, but I'd be interested in your take on this article that Huckbucket posted a link to. While ge didn't go so far as to say he agreed, he didn't say he disagreed either. fwiw I think it's important https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/...reliable-data/
So we’re white-knighting the geographic origin of the virus now?
Clearly we have a long way to go before this gets serious.
I still call it The Jake.
I circulated the prepress. WIDELY.
But many hospitals responded "damn the evidence we will still move to droplet... we don't have the PPE or the negative rooms"
Then I heard "oh but still airborne for aerosolizing procedures, then back to droplet"
"So, what about the aeresol residence that will present for >1hr in a normal room?"
"..."
Originally Posted by blurred
So why is "Spanish Flu" = ok, but "Chinese Flu" = not ok? I mean it DID come from there... along with SARS, Bird Flu, Swine Flu, etc.
I mean how many worldwide pandemics can those guys keep kicking off before we can stop having to be so politically correct?
Until the Chinese government is willing to do SOMETHING about their vile "wet markets," then we get to talk some trash, ok?
Bookmarks