how many gold gloves though![]()
how many gold gloves though![]()
j'ai des grands instants de lucididididididididi
Schilling will get in because of the sock, and the sock story will be highlighted, and the sock will be there, and Joe Buck will be wearing it.
Well maybe I'm the faggot America
I'm not a part of a redneck agenda
Sock's already there, or at least it was on display there in I guess 2012 or so when we went.
Why? I had no issue with the cutesie nobody gets 100 percent thing. It never kept anyone deserving out. And there has been a backlog of over 10 worthy guys for a while. I think if I had the vote in recent years, I would've left off the shoo-ins in order to advance the candidacy of the Trammels of the world.
I think it's funny that Mussina went in before Schilling. For my money (and most people's money, probably), Schilling was the better pitcher. He's such a douchebag in retirement, though. I'm guessing most people just don't want to hear him speak at Cooperstown. That'll be a fucking train wreck.
Schill's induction speech at the Hall. Yikes.
All very good players. Hall of very good.
Get out of here with that shit. Mike Mussina was great??? Not everyone should get a medal.
Decisions Decisions
The best part of that train wreck is going to be Jeter sitting there, trying to keep a straight face as the unhinged diatribe hits the 90 minute mark.
Mussina was legitimately the second-best pitcher in the AL for a long time. It just so happens that it was a time when Pedro was having the most dominant peak of any pitcher in history and offense was through the roof. So I get the argument for his inclusion, though I prefer the players who were more dominant rather than steady, very good, and durable, too.
Mussina came in second for the cy young voting a whopping 1 time. Never won. Very good pitcher. Starting pitcher in the hall of very good.
Give me the pitchers routinely winning cy youngs or coming in top 3 for a somewhat extended time. Won a title. Did anything at all besides be very good for a somewhat long time.
All those pitchers coming ahead of Mussina? Elect them. Clemens? Randy Johnson (duh). David Cone? Al Leiter? Kevin Appier? Where do you draw the line
Decisions Decisions
8 top 6 CYA finishes
11 seasons of top 10 ERA
7 gold gloves
He was one of the best pitchers in the league for a very long time. That's Hall of Fame worthy in my book.
"fuck off you asshat gaper shit for brains fucktard wanker." - Jesus Christ
"She was tossing her bean salad with the vigor of a Drunken Pop princess so I walked out of the corner and said.... "need a hand?"" - Odin
"everybody's got their hooks into you, fuck em....forge on motherfuckers, drag all those bitches across the goal line with you." - (not so) ill-advised strategy
Cone was great at his peak(s) but lacked consistency which Mussina had tons of. Leiter wasn't really on anyone's radar as a HOF, Appier played for maybe crappy teams that could have suppressed his win total and I don't think he can make a blyleven case.
But really, Morris with his crappy era+ drove a bus through the door for someone like Moose who was objectively very good (123+ over a long career).
j'ai des grands instants de lucididididididididi
Mussina:
career Baseball-Reference WAR of 82.9 — 18th among pitchers since 1900 — is above the average WAR of starting pitchers in the Hall of Fame (73.4).
270 wins, 2,813 strikeouts
one of only 16 pitchers in the modern era to end his career with at least one hundred more wins than losses. He’s also one of 15 pitchers to strikeout at least 2,000 more hitters than he walked. He’s one of only five pitchers to win at least 10 games a season for 17 straight seasons and the only one to do it entirely in the American League.
one of only two pitchers to retire after a 20-win season. The other is Sandy Koufax.
Did it all in the AL east and in hitter's parks
Yeah, I mean, his case is really made by WAR and ERA+ to give him credit for the tough offensive environment. Aesthetically, I prefer the players who were really dominant for five years and then fall apart over the guys like Mussina. But I understand his case for the hall and I don't begrudge him it.
I agree. I don’t hate Mussina in there, I just feel like the threshold is getting to lesser players. Biggio.
The Appier comparison is a little tongue in cheek. On the spectrum mussina is somewhere between Pedro and Appier. And I think the HOF line should be closer to Pedro than Appier.
Decisions Decisions
Biggio was the tip of the iceberg
Wow... just realized that there are only 79 pitchers in the HOF: https://baseballhall.org/discover-mo...rs-by-position
Only 1% of all ball players get in. You'd think that the more they let in, the better for business?![]()
Screw the net, Surf the backcountry!
I think he represents the career achiever vs dominant player distinction, and a player who got in for ‘not being a steroid guy’ while many ‘steroid guys’ (yes, many of whom were caught) were left off ballots, allowing him in.
I know I've had the Biggio discussion on here before. He was durable and played a long time, but he generated all his WAR at his peak when he was leading the league in OBP and scoring 150 runs per season. Maybe the fossils let him in because he played forever and got 3,000 hits, but he was probably deserving if he'd retired 3 or 4 years earlier (and maybe those late-career years tarnished his memory for some of us. He was incredible in the mid-1990s.)
It'll be interesting to see how the Hall voters treat Utley, who has had a similar career. And it's too bad that Pedroia looks done. If he could've hung on for another 4 or 5 good seasons, he would've had a nice case.
The Cooperstown voters are tough on second basemen.
Compelling arguments for sure. I just don’t want it to turn into the NFL hof where so many get in. Or the Celtics rafters, who are going to have to issue 3 digit player numbers to field a team.
15th best second baseman via WAR? There should be max 10 second basemen total.
Decisions Decisions
Bookmarks