Check Out Our Shop
Page 23 of 134 FirstFirst ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... LastLast
Results 551 to 575 of 3346

Thread: The Official Salomon S/Lab SHIFT MNC Thread -AMA

  1. #551
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Been skiing Atomic Backland 107s with SHIFT last little while

    The Backland is so light but destroys pow. The crazy looking super thin HRZN tip looks like it'll flap around and/or fall off but it really works. Floats fine in pow but still has heft so you can drive it through mank with a bit of pressure. The SHIFT binding keeps delivering without issues. More i use it the less faffing around you do for transitions.

    12 days so far on Salomon and Atomic versions.

  2. #552
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,479
    Got to check out a pair in person this weekend.
    I was impressed. Toe and heel pieces seemed as solid as any alpine binding and the shift to and from touring mode has a reassuringly solid 'thunk' to it.
    Brakes and heel lifter seemed a little lighter duty perhaps to save a bit of weight where possible but the important bits looked really good.
    The Salomon athlete who I trust was pretty pumped on them too.

  3. #553
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Wroclaw, dolny ?l?sk ,
    Posts
    1,389
    Quote Originally Posted by counterfeitfake View Post
    The Duke and Guardian are heavy and tour poorly, which were pretty obvious from the beginning, they were just successful because people wanted a touring binding that skied like an alpine binding. Are there more faults I'm not thinking of? Do they ski much worse than most alpine binding? I've used Dukes for almost all my inbounds skiing the last several years, they've seemed to be very reliable and perform well.
    successfull because they ski like an alpine binding or because they didn't want to own AT boots as well?

    Sent from my SM-G930F using TGR Forums mobile app
    i dont kare i carnt spell or youse punktuation properlee, im on a skiing forum

  4. #554
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Wroclaw, dolny ?l?sk ,
    Posts
    1,389
    Quote Originally Posted by LHutz Esq View Post
    But if a) the wife only let me have one set up - it would be the shifts on a 105/106 ski like the Quests I tried em on with some nice stiff touring boots- luckily my issue isn’t that I can’t buy new skis just if I buy myself a pair - I have to buy her a pair.
    if in either of the above mentioned situations best advice is to find another woman



    Sent from my SM-G930F using TGR Forums mobile app
    i dont kare i carnt spell or youse punktuation properlee, im on a skiing forum

  5. #555
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    For the front rangers and summit peeps. Shifts will be apart of the LL demos this weekend!
    https://backcountrymagazine.com/back...2018-loveland/


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  6. #556
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Pictures telling a thousand words the SHIFT brakes run wide.

    100m brakes on a 99m ski (2018-9) Salomon QST99.

    Left is tour mode. Right is ski mode. Tons of clearance

    If you get the brakes too wide you can hit them when skinning in pow which forces the brakes from stowed away tour mode to walk mode. So get the brakes to fit your ski (duh)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	brakesDSC00195.jpg 
Views:	424 
Size:	130.1 KB 
ID:	227522

  7. #557
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    355
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    Pictures telling a thousand words the SHIFT brakes run wide.
    Thanks LeeLau,

    Really helpful. Looks like I can get those on my Protests w/minimal bending!

    Cheers,
    Paul

  8. #558
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by JPaul View Post
    Thanks LeeLau,

    Really helpful. Looks like I can get those on my Protests w/minimal bending!

    Cheers,
    Paul
    No problem - if i remember I'll take pics of the Atomic SHIFTS 110mm brake on the 107 Atomic Backland

  9. #559
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,799
    I'm considering the 4frnt Raven, line sick day tourist and sick day 104 as 75% out, 25% inbound to pair with shift. Dont think I want to go lighter than 1700g. Blister loves all 3 skiis, they won best of in touring:

    Weights and lengths measured

    Raven: 183cm, 104mm, 1750g, full rocker
    Tourist: 183cm, 102mm, 1750g, camber
    Sick day: 185cm, 104mm, 1900g, camber


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  10. #560
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post
    I'm considering the 4frnt Raven, line sick day tourist and sick day 104 as 75% out, 25% inbound to pair with shift. Dont think I want to go lighter than 1700g. Blister loves all 3 skiis, they won best of in touring:

    Weights and lengths measured

    Raven: 183cm, 104mm, 1750g, full rocker
    Tourist: 183cm, 102mm, 1750g, camber
    Sick day: 185cm, 104mm, 1900g, camber
    Cool story, bro...? Did you have a question, or were you just posting to let everyone know what skis you're considering?
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  11. #561
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,799
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    Cool story, bro...? Did you have a question, or were you just posting to let everyone know what skis you're considering?
    I posted too fast, bro


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  12. #562
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,799
    Quote Originally Posted by margotron View Post

    Disclaimer: I'm new to this BC stuff. Been trying to overcome my ignorance but not there clearly.

    Anyone have experience with these? Relative stiffness, float, etc? Will be my first bc ski.

    Last: how much am I going to notice that 150g? I won't be doing more than 3000 vert usually, sometimes 5k.

    I'm considering the 4frnt Raven, line sick day tourist and sick day 104 as 75% out, 25% inbound to pair with shift. Dont think I want to go lighter than 1700g. Blister loves all 3 skiis, they won best of in touring:

    Weights and lengths measured

    Raven: 183cm, 104mm, 1750g, full rocker
    Tourist: 183cm, 102mm, 1750g, camber
    Sick day: 185cm, 104mm, 1900g, camber


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums



    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  13. #563
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    13,614
    Anyone figured out if the Shift hole pattern will be similar to other Salomon binders like the Warden? Would like to upgrade possibly next season without swiss cheezin the new skies.

  14. #564
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,274
    Quote Originally Posted by shredgnar View Post
    Anyone figured out if the Shift hole pattern will be similar to other Salomon binders like the Warden? Would like to upgrade possibly next season without swiss cheezin the new skies.
    They will not be the same, but I don't know if they can share any holes yet. There was a preliminary template put a few pages back that you could work that out from. I'm too lazy...

  15. #565
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Did we come to the conclusion that pulling kingpins and mounting shifts would be fine as far as the toe piece is concerned?

  16. #566
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    North Vancouver
    Posts
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    Pictures telling a thousand words the SHIFT brakes run wide.

    100m brakes on a 99m ski (2018-9) Salomon QST99.

    Left is tour mode. Right is ski mode. Tons of clearance

    If you get the brakes too wide you can hit them when skinning in pow which forces the brakes from stowed away tour mode to walk mode. So get the brakes to fit your ski (duh)

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	brakesDSC00195.jpg 
Views:	424 
Size:	130.1 KB 
ID:	227522
    the first bend in brake is how close to the deck? i only ask because from that perspective and your advice of that being a 100mm brake on a similar width ski looks like it would fit a 110 or more?

  17. #567
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by FlimFlamvanHam View Post
    the first bend in brake is how close to the deck? i only ask because from that perspective and your advice of that being a 100mm brake on a similar width ski looks like it would fit a 110 or more?
    It might. They're wide. Like I said i dont recommend overbending but feel free to try. You can always shave the plastic from the inner arms

  18. #568
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Think a 100mm brake could fit a 108mm ski? Or is that pushing it a bit much?

    We're up to 21 pre orders for the Tahoe Mountain Sports deal, and I suspect brake size indecision is playing a factor in some people not pulling the trigger yet.

  19. #569
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Think a 100mm brake could fit a 108mm ski? Or is that pushing it a bit much?

    We're up to 21 pre orders for the Tahoe Mountain Sports deal, and I suspect brake size indecision is playing a factor in some people not pulling the trigger yet.
    You guys (not you personally but everyone in this thread) keep asking the same question and I'll keep giving the same answer. I'm fairly confident it will work for 105mm. Beyond that you're on your own. Like someone else said upthread you're getting a group buy discount. Any more assurances needed and best to wait till they're in store and you can verify on whatever ski you want to put them on. If you don't want to pull the trigger because of brake size then that's fine.

  20. #570
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    1,897
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Did we come to the conclusion that pulling kingpins and mounting shifts would be fine as far as the toe piece is concerned?
    Didn't we figure out that the holes are totally different and far from having any conflict?

  21. #571
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Quote Originally Posted by robnow View Post
    Didn't we figure out that the holes are totally different and far from having any conflict?
    Yes, I went back and found it after failing on my first attempt. Sorry for the repetition.

    Anyway, I'm already in on the pre-order... and I figure if I want to change the brake size there's still plenty of time for that later on.

  22. #572
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,929
    I may have missed it -- but has there been any discussion on the swappability of brakes?

    I could see these being killer for a travel setup, with a couple of pairs of skis and inserts.

  23. #573
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    102
    does anyone have the length of adjustment for the shift , want to use with two pairs of boots that differ by 9mm , my radical 2 have 15mm so hoping these will have that much ??

  24. #574
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    3,038
    Quote Originally Posted by scblurlt View Post
    does anyone have the length of adjustment for the shift , want to use with two pairs of boots that differ by 9mm , my radical 2 have 15mm so hoping these will have that much ??
    What happened to JONG SLAUGHTER?

    SEARCH JONG

    It's in this thread multiple times. Google knows. Salomon's website states it. FUCKING SEARCH
    sproing!

  25. #575
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Squamish, BC
    Posts
    926
    presumably the mount jig puts it right to the middle of that stated adjustment range, right?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •