Just heard on the discovery channel that everyday in Alaska, 20 thousand trillion tons of ice move across Alaska. That number is hard to understand.![]()
Just heard on the discovery channel that everyday in Alaska, 20 thousand trillion tons of ice move across Alaska. That number is hard to understand.![]()
ROLL TIDE ROLL
ohhhhhhh....like my bank account.....got it.
ROLL TIDE ROLL
If some of the best times of my life were skiing the UP in -40 wind chill with nothing but jeans, cotton long johns and a wine flask to keep warm while sleeping in the back of my dad's van... does that make me old school?
"REHAB SAVAGE, REHAB!!!"
20(quad),000(tri),000(bil),000(mil),000(thou),000. ..
You is right!!! Thanks... Buy hey, I was only 1,000 times low (000).
so would be this in pounds;
40,000,000,000,000,000,000... or 40 quintillion pounds? Eh?
WTF??? Just checked at websters.com...
I know they've got money and weight messed up there... but what gives them the right to have a different counting system???quin·til·lion /kwɪnˈtɪlyən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[kwin-til-yuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, plural -lions, (as after a numeral) -lion, adjective
–noun
1. a cardinal number represented in the U.S. by 1 followed by 18 zeros, and in Great Britain by 1 followed by 30 zeros.
–adjective
2. amounting to one quintillion in number.
If some of the best times of my life were skiing the UP in -40 wind chill with nothing but jeans, cotton long johns and a wine flask to keep warm while sleeping in the back of my dad's van... does that make me old school?
"REHAB SAVAGE, REHAB!!!"
If some of the best times of my life were skiing the UP in -40 wind chill with nothing but jeans, cotton long johns and a wine flask to keep warm while sleeping in the back of my dad's van... does that make me old school?
"REHAB SAVAGE, REHAB!!!"
1 ft^3 of ice = ~65 lbs
1 cy of ice = ~1755 lbs
1 sqmi = ~30 million sqyd = ~ 30 million tons per 3 feet thick
Alaska only has 570,374 sqmi of area
Lets say it's 3000 feet thick so
1 sqmi @ 3000' = 30 billion tons ice
20,000,000,000,000,000
-----------------------
30,000,000,000
equals ~670,000 Square miles of ice, 3000 feet deep. And that would cover all of Alaska and a good part of BC.
I think you need to get your ears cleaned.
I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.
If you're going to get all technical on it, I'd suggest that the ice can probably cover the lakes and the bays that make up the remaining 86k square miles of what is technically Alaska. That leaves only 3k or so square miles to ice for Canada and I suspect most of that would go to the Yukon with the longest border with AK.
Of course, we're both making lots of assumptions which only reinforces the fact that if your calculations are correct he heard wrong.
"if the city is visibly one of humankind's greatest achievements, its uncontrolled evolution also can lead to desecration of both nature and the human spirit."
-- Melvin G. Marcus 1979
I get 7,357,962 square miles
[40,000,000,000,000,000,000/(5280*5280*3000*65)]
--maybe he could of heard wrong....but it was cool to think about that much ice moving
math is tough at this hour though--I hope it is right
let your tracks be lost in the dark and snow
always possible i heard it wrong, but the wife and I both heard that #(does not mean it is right). It was on Fearless Planet on the Disc. Channel. A LOT of ice regardless.
ROLL TIDE ROLL
I saw that last night too. Dont know what the number was 2 or 20 or whatever, but it was definitely x thousand trillion tons.
I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.
"Hoo-jers"
Ah, metric system...
1 ton = 1000 kgs = 1000 liters = 1 cubic meter.
That's still a shitload of ice.
"Typically euro, french in particular, in my opinion. It's the same skiing or climbing there. They are completely unfazed by their own assholeness. Like it's normal." - srsosbso
Except it is [40e18lbs/(5280ft/mile*5280ft/mile*3000ft*65lb/ft^3)] = 7,357,000 miles^2....right?Originally Posted by DJSapp
![]()
let your tracks be lost in the dark and snow
If some of the best times of my life were skiing the UP in -40 wind chill with nothing but jeans, cotton long johns and a wine flask to keep warm while sleeping in the back of my dad's van... does that make me old school?
"REHAB SAVAGE, REHAB!!!"
Ahh unit conversions --if this isn't right I have a lot of work to recheck
lb/(ft/mi*ft/mi*ft*lb/ft^3 )-->lb/(lb/mi^2)
lb/(lb/mi^2) = lb * mi^2/lb = mi^2
let your tracks be lost in the dark and snow
Oops, sorry gorm, I'm f'd up, our numbers do agree within rounding.
BZZT!!!Originally Posted by djsapp
1 sqmi = ~ 3 million sqyd, therefore 6.7 million sqmi, 3000 ft thick with a bunch of rounding done by me.
Fun fact: the surface of the earth is 197,000,000 sqmi.
The 20,000 trillion number may have been the amount of ice on the planet, as far as alaska, I don't buy it.
I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.
It's always amusing watching Americans and Brits try to figure out big numbers and measurements.
American: "So, we've concluded that we are 100 quintrillion dollars in debt."
Britmerican: "That jibes with our data: 100 gillintons, give or take a wick-be-tralling or two."
American: "Let's move on to the weight of that big rock over there."
Britmerican: "The one near the lorry?"
American: "His name is Laurie? How tall do you think that guy is, btw?"
Britmerican: "I'd say the rock weighs about 10 stone, a guilder, two ricklebrakes, and a half-bushel of acorns. And I'd guess Mr. Laurie to be 1 rod, seven leagues tall...maybe a rod, seven leagues, and a grain."
American: "I figure the rock at 16 cubits minus a half-ricklebrake. Laurie at three furlongs minus a dram."
Britamerican: "Could be. Care for a lemon squash?"
American: "Boy howdy, do I! It'll go great with these deep-fried cheesecakeburgers."
Last edited by Cliff Huckable; 11-29-2007 at 12:58 PM.
"Active management in bear markets tends to outperform. Unfortunately, investors are not as elated with relative returns when they are negative. But it does support the argument that active management adds value." -- independent fund analyst Peter Loach
Bookmarks