Check Out Our Shop
Page 20 of 46 FirstFirst ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 1128

Thread: A jet plane on a large treadmill

  1. #476
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Incline
    Posts
    1,051
    Quote Originally Posted by f2f View Post
    are you saying the threadmill can spin at a speed larger than the speed of light? i'll tell you what then: nothing. and everything.

    stop "thinking" and start thinking.
    I can't think anymore. Sell the treadmill to the girls' track team and give the plane back to Boeing.

    Personally, I think it's a great explanation on the thread next door. That makes sense to me. The question was never worded correctly and specifics are purposefully left out to create mass hysteria, which we've seen here over the past 20+ pages.
    Turning is for when things get in your way ||

  2. #477
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Haxorland
    Posts
    7,102
    w00t!!! page 20!!!! Plus another 5 in a second thread!!!

    Rolling friction does not increase with speed. The rolling friction on a 747 is 78,000 lbs. 78,000 lbs of resistance is all the treadmill can possibly provide no matter what speed the treadmill is spinning at. It could be going twice the speed of light and it would only provide 78,000 lbs. of resistance.

    The 747's engines provide 380,000 lbs. thrust.

    380,000 is bigger than 78,000

    THEREFORE:

    There is a net force (read: acceleration) of 302,000 lbs. on the airplane.

    If you don't understand this, open a fucking physics book and get a fucking education.
    I've concluded that DJSapp was never DJSapp, and Not DJSapp is also not DJSapp, so that means he's telling the truth now and he was lying before.

  3. #478
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Skiattle
    Posts
    7,750
    DJSapp
    You're one persistant fellow to keep goin at this

    everyone seriously
    just look at the stupid motorcycle picture, its the same thing

    imagine what would happen if you had a tow rope sucked into the turbine and shot out the other end. the plane would move along the tow rope and the wheels would just be spinning twice as fast. (ie im saying just imagine the wings\turbines were attached to a tow rope like at a ski resort)

    thats my final post here

  4. #479
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sector 7G
    Posts
    5,660
    How about a helicopter? Could it take off if sitting on a treadmill?

  5. #480
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    north by northwest
    Posts
    9,456
    ^ you can't win against a cold, calculating, malevolent and omnipotent threadmill.

  6. #481
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,543
    I know what a treadmill is. Now please tell me WTF a threadmill is.

  7. #482
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    north by northwest
    Posts
    9,456
    it's a mill for threads. or a misspelling. you choose.

  8. #483
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Da burgh
    Posts
    2,695
    this is fucking rediculous, of course the plane takes off. No treadmill can stop the motion of a plane once the engines turn on. The jets turn on, the plane moves forward at the same speed as usual, and the wheels spin like mad and dont do anything. Jesus, 20 pages for this.

  9. #484
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Republik Indonesia
    Posts
    7,288
    AD, THIS QUESTION is a thredmill.

  10. #485
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Whitefish
    Posts
    4,501
    Just in case some of you have become confused by these 20 pages let me simplify the whole damn thing by giving you the answer....

    THE PLANE WILL TAKE OFF.

    If you don't understand how it could then thats too bad for you just deal with it.

  11. #486
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Point of No Return
    Posts
    2,016
    Quote Originally Posted by Lonnie View Post
    How about a helicopter? Could it take off if sitting on a treadmill?

    Better yet, what about a helicopter sitting on a merry-go-round that is spinning in the opposite direction as the blades, matching their rotation?

  12. #487
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Whitefish
    Posts
    4,501
    Quote Originally Posted by MeatPuppet View Post
    Better yet, what about a helicopter sitting on a merry-go-round that is spinning in the opposite direction as the blades, matching their rotation?
    W00T!! LOL!! The helo takes off methinks

  13. #488
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3
    What's the proportional snake loading between the merry-go-round and the helicopter?

  14. #489
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Point of No Return
    Posts
    2,016
    Quote Originally Posted by Reno View Post
    What's the proportional snake loading between the merry-go-round and the helicopter?

    Black on yellow kill a fella?

  15. #490
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado Cartel HQ
    Posts
    15,931
    Quote Originally Posted by "The Big One" View Post
    A plane (747 passenger jet) is sitting on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyor). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyor moves in the opposite direction. This conveyor has a control system that tracks the planes speed and tunes the speed of the conveyor to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction).

    The question is:

    Will the plane (747 passenger jet) take off or not?
    Without reading this whole thread......
    Of course the plane would fly.
    Jet planes operate off of thrust which gets it's propulsion from the air. If planes took off by using torque to tires like a car, then the "conveyor" would be relevant. In this case, it's not. The conveyor would just spin the wheels on the plane twice as fast.


    Here's an even tougher question- What weighs more?

    A pound of feathers or a pound of gold?
    Last edited by BlurredElevens; 02-25-2007 at 10:13 PM.

  16. #491
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    9,300ft
    Posts
    23,138
    But what if there are MOTHERFUCKING SNAKES ON THE MOTHERFUCKING TREADMILL!?
    Quote Originally Posted by blurred
    skiing is hiking all day so that you can ski on shitty gear for 5 minutes.

  17. #492
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Whitefish
    Posts
    4,501
    Quote Originally Posted by Summit View Post
    But what if there are MOTHERFUCKING SNAKES ON THE MOTHERFUCKING TREADMILL!?
    then we all would be motherfucked!

  18. #493
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Hokkaido
    Posts
    1,300
    This plane with take off, motherfucking snakes or none.

    Blurred has it exactly right.

    I boiled my thermometer, and sure enough, this spot, which purported to be two thousand feet higher than the locality of the hotel, turned out to be nine thousand feet LOWER. Thus the fact was clearly demonstrated that, ABOVE A CERTAIN POINT, THE HIGHER A POINT SEEMS TO BE, THE LOWER IT ACTUALLY IS. Our ascent itself was a great achievement, but this contribution to science was an inconceivably greater matter.

    --MT--

  19. #494
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,618
    Quote Originally Posted by Bernardo View Post
    Credentials: I'm an Aerospace Engineer AND Mathematician.

    Solution: The airplane WILL take off.

    Explanation: Thrust is provided by the jet engines. Thrust is needed to overcome Drag. Drag is made up of aerodynamic drag, and friction drag on the wheels. The friction drag on the wheels/bearings will be *marginally* higher on the spinning treadmill, but will continuously diminish as the airplane gains speed and the lift increases, thus reduction wheel friction.

    Source of confusion: The problem statement is slightly confusing because it says something about the treadmill spinning at the same speed of the aircraft. This could induce some people to believe that the two velocities cancel each other out, whereas the truth is that the wheels will simply spin twice as fast (remember, the wheels of the aircraft are free spinning).

    - B
    I'm changing my POV. I'm with this guy. Stupid freespinning wheels, confusing me. If somehow the wheels were restricted to spin only as fast as the air speed was then the velocities would negate each other, but with freespinning wheels, I now think that this would take off.
    It's not tragic to die doing what you love.
    http://www.flickr.com/pearljam09/
    http://pearljam09.blogspot.com/

  20. #495
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mass.
    Posts
    754
    I have: a really old pair of rollerblades somewhere
    I have: some rope

    If you have:
    A motorcycle
    A treadmill

    Then we need to make this happen. We can then track down and send invitations to the 40 or so people that voted for "no take off" in the other thread and get them here to try it out.

    Who's your dead friend there?
    Cause he's dead.
    *points @ dude on treadmill with rollerblades*

  21. #496
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    where it's steep and deep
    Posts
    2,296
    Quote Originally Posted by yodaottis View Post
    I have: a really old pair of rollerblades somewhere
    I have: some rope

    If you have:
    A motorcycle
    A treadmill

    Then we need to make this happen. We can then track down and send invitations to the 40 or so people that voted for "no take off" in the other thread and get them here to try it out.

    Who's your dead friend there?
    Cause he's dead.
    *points @ dude on treadmill with rollerblades*
    Well, actually, the dead dude would be off the treadmill
    Ein Berg ohne Absturzgefahr ist nur noch Attrappe. (Reinhold Messner)

  22. #497
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    2,352
    Quote Originally Posted by BlurredElevens View Post
    Without reading this whole thread......
    Of course the plane would fly.
    Jet planes operate off of thrust which gets it's propulsion from the air. If planes took off by using torque to tires like a car, then the "conveyor" would be relevant. In this case, it's not. The conveyor would just spin the wheels on the plane twice as fast.


    Here's an even tougher question- What weighs more?

    A pound of feathers or a pound of gold?
    Pound of feathers - gold is measured in troy units - 14oz to a pound.

  23. #498
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,393
    A youtube vid

    So, for those who had problems with 'The jet plane on a large treadmill' thread... what happens if the speed of the escalator is increased?

  24. #499
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Republik Indonesia
    Posts
    7,288
    He'd stop obviously.

  25. #500
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    JH - PDX
    Posts
    246
    speaking of superthread....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •