Check Out Our Shop
Page 22 of 46 FirstFirst ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... LastLast
Results 526 to 550 of 1128

Thread: A jet plane on a large treadmill

  1. #526
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Quote Originally Posted by focus View Post







    Oh well. You're wrong, tippster. But I guess I don't actually care.
    I'm not, and you do.

  2. #527
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    7,113
    I wish I knew who was faking and who is still trying to convince people that the plane would do one thing or the other.
    Decisions Decisions

  3. #528
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Way East Tennessee
    Posts
    4,634
    I think the plane would pull a Steve Miller.

    Ken

  4. #529
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    State of Disbelief
    Posts
    602
    And the answer is......

  5. #530
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Quote Originally Posted by TNKen View Post
    I think the plane would pull a Steve Ray Vaughn.

    Ken
    fixed it for ya.
    Kill all the telemarkers
    But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
    Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
    Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason

  6. #531
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    A beer fortress in the kingdom of cheese...
    Posts
    3,742
    I read page 1, then clicked to page 2... and quickly said "what the FUCK are these idiots discussing for more than 12 pages???" Jumped to page 22 (another WTF?) to add... which is likely to have already been covered YEARS ago (and NO thanks to the 'tard that bumped this), that the;

    JET ENGINES ACT ON THE AIR, NOT ON THE FUCKING TREADMILL IDIOTS... Even if it were a 100 mile treadmill, the force of the jet engines (pushing against said air) would push the mutha fuckin plane (with or without SNAKES BTW {or skates, which was a good analogy in said first 2 pages} ) up to take off speed relative to land/air and it would "take off"!!!

    Pheww... saved 21 pages of reading 'tards arguing there. (And sure bet'cha missed some good 'umor dere eh, sorry!!!)

    (Also, no sooner did I hit "submit" than I realized another way to say the same shit is; Imagine you are standing on a treadmill on roller skates (read on page 1 or 2?) BUT BUT BUT, you have a set of monkey bars above you. Start the treadmill (at ANY speed) but hold on to, then pull forward rung after rung on the money bars and you'll move forward, right???!!!! SHIT YES!!! Same thing as the jets acting on the air...)

    Oh... Since you asked; "red wine", and "yeah, lots" and "YES" I do think I'll have to go back someday and read the other 21 pages of the thread.
    Last edited by timvwcom; 01-17-2008 at 02:51 AM.
    If some of the best times of my life were skiing the UP in -40 wind chill with nothing but jeans, cotton long johns and a wine flask to keep warm while sleeping in the back of my dad's van... does that make me old school?

    "REHAB SAVAGE, REHAB!!!"

  7. #532
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    287
    So let me get this straight...what your saying is that if I wear a condom, I never really even touched the girl so it cant be cheating, right?

  8. #533
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,241
    Quote Originally Posted by Tippster View Post
    I'm not, and you do.
    No, he's right, as long as the treadmill is pegged to vehicle speed and not wheel speed (i.e. with some kind of radar gun setup, not the car's speedometer).

    Car will move forward at X, treadmill will move backward at -X and the wheels will be spinning at 2X.

  9. #534
    doughboyshredder Guest
    It's really simple.

    Do you feel the wind across your face while running on a treadmill?

    No.

    That is because no matter how fast you run, if the treadmill is matching your speed there is no increase in the airflow across your face.

    Get it?

    No increase in the airflow. No lift.

    Plane won't fly. Looking forward to Mythbusters proving this once and for all, even though it seems so basic.

  10. #535
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    No, he's right, as long as the treadmill is pegged to vehicle speed and not wheel speed (i.e. with some kind of radar gun setup, not the car's speedometer).

    Car will move forward at X, treadmill will move backward at -X and the wheels will be spinning at 2X.
    well.... duuuuuhhhhh....

    stomp stomp stomp...

    SLAM

    *sob*

    EDIT:

    And Doughboy comes to the Retard rescue.
    -If Airplanes moved forward due to propulsion from Legs (or wheels) you would be so right. Yet they do not, so you are wrong.

  11. #536
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,241
    Quote Originally Posted by doughboyshredder View Post
    It's really simple.

    Do you feel the wind across your face while running on a treadmill?

    No.

    That is because no matter how fast you run, if the treadmill is matching your speed there is no increase in the airflow across your face.

    Get it?

    No increase in the airflow. No lift.

    Plane won't fly. Looking forward to Mythbusters proving this once and for all, even though it seems so basic.
    You're even dumber than your website implies.

  12. #537
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    8,695
    Quote Originally Posted by ProHoHater View Post
    So let me get this straight...what your saying is that if I wear a condom, I never really even touched the girl so it cant be cheating, right?

    Well, it depends. Was there any kissing involved? If so, you're fucked.
    "We don't beat the reaper by living longer, we beat the reaper by living well and living fully." - Randy Pausch

  13. #538
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    No, he's right, as long as the treadmill is pegged to vehicle speed and not wheel speed (i.e. with some kind of radar gun setup, not the car's speedometer).

    Car will move forward at X, treadmill will move backward at -X and the wheels will be spinning at 2X.
    No, he's not right. The simply fact that the freely-rotating wheels represent a disconnect in the kinematics between the treadmill and the air-propelled plane means that no equation can exist between the treadmill and the plane. Wheels will be spinning at NX, it doesn't matter and isn't valid. No longitudinal force can be exerted on the plane through the interface of the wheels.

    Anyone still in this argument is only in it for the joy of rhetoric. I also notice you're now using "car" which is a further tangent moving away from the actual myth.
    Last edited by bio-smear; 01-18-2008 at 12:24 PM.

  14. #539
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Halfway Between the Gutter and the Stars
    Posts
    3,857
    I really like the way this topic brings out the true stoopidity of some people.


    Quote Originally Posted by doughboyshredder View Post
    It's really simple.

    Do you feel the wind across your face while running on a treadmill?

    No.

    That is because no matter how fast you run, if the treadmill is matching your speed there is no increase in the airflow across your face.

    Get it?

    No increase in the airflow. No lift.

    Plane won't fly. Looking forward to Mythbusters proving this once and for all, even though it seems so basic.
    You are what you eat.
    ---------------------------------------------------
    There's no such thing as bad snow, just shitty skiers.

  15. #540
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Quote Originally Posted by bio-smear View Post
    No, he's not right. The simply fact that the freely-rotating wheels represent a disconnect in the kinematics between the treadmill and the air-propelled plane means that no equation can exist between the treadmill and the plane. Wheels will be spinning at NX, it doesn't matter and isn't valid. No longitudinal force can be exerted on the plane through the interface of the wheels.

    Anyone still in this argument is only in it for the joy of rhetoric.
    We were talking about a car, and that the treadmill moves in relation to the vehicle, not its wheels.... but thanks for being there for me.

    Regarding the plane, if the treadmill is tied to the speed of the wheels they would both be rotating at the speed of light rather quickly (assuming there is no drag/friction at all.) At that point the wheels would need to rotate greater than the speed of light (c+Takeoff speed) for the plane to take off, which is impossible.....

  16. #541
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Tippster View Post
    At that point the wheels would need to rotate greater than the speed of light (c+Takeoff speed) for the plane to take off, which is impossible.....
    Only german bearings are capable of this.

  17. #542
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Stuck in perpetual Meh
    Posts
    35,244
    Airbus always wins... [/Boeing whine]

  18. #543
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,241
    Quote Originally Posted by bio-smear View Post
    No, he's not right. The simply fact that the freely-rotating wheels represent a disconnect in the kinematics between the treadmill and the air-propelled plane means that no equation can exist between the treadmill and the plane. Wheels will be spinning at NX, it doesn't matter and isn't valid. No longitudinal force can be exerted on the plane through the interface of the wheels.
    Where in that post did I say anything about a plane?

    Quote Originally Posted by bio-smear View Post
    I also notice you're now using "car" which is a further tangent moving away from the actual myth.
    I said "car" because the little discussion Tipp, Focus and I are having is a about a...wait for it...car. Focus postulated a tangential argument that even a car would move forward on the treadmill if the treadmill speed was not pegged to the wheel speed (i.e. treadmill speed = speedo reading), but instead pegged to vehicle speed (i.e. via some kind of radar gun setup). Tipp disagreed, but I agree with focus and presented an argument to Tipp that was apparently convincing as he seems to have eaten his crow and gone to pout in the corner like a nancy boy ( ). If you would like some further explanation of why I think the car will move, please let me know.


    edit: me type slow

  19. #544
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,787
    Amazing.

    bio-smear: The equation between the airplane and the treadmill is expressly stated in the premise. This equation applies as equally to a car as it does an airplane.

    doughboy: I have no words.

  20. #545
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    Who the fuck cares about cars? Anyone who brought up a car in this discussion, I slap you across the lips with my silk barnstormer scarf.

  21. #546
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Iron Range
    Posts
    4,965
    Quote Originally Posted by focus View Post
    Amazing.

    bio-smear: The equation between the airplane and the treadmill is expressly stated in the premise. This equation applies as equally to a car as it does an airplane.
    No.

    Also, Mythbusters will prove nothing, as what you've moved into now are theoretical discussions about the treadmill speed having to move toward inifinite speeds to apply force against something that will not react to force in that axis.

    I concede that the wheel bearings will seize at 50,000 rpm, unless they are german.

  22. #547
    Hugh Conway Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    You're even dumber than your website implies.
    I believe it's spelled your

  23. #548
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,241
    Quote Originally Posted by bio-smear View Post
    Who the fuck cares about cars?
    Because if a car (whose power is transmitted directly to the treadmill) will move, then a plane (whose power transmission is completely independent of the treadmill) will most certainly take off. Not that I expected it to end the discussion, but it's an interesting thought experiment.

  24. #549
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    2,270
    If you are this dumb how do you even get you pants on in the morning?

    Quote Originally Posted by doughboyshredder View Post
    It's really simple.

    Do you feel the wind across your face while running on a treadmill?

    No.

    That is because no matter how fast you run, if the treadmill is matching your speed there is no increase in the airflow across your face.

    Get it?

    No increase in the airflow. No lift.

    Plane won't fly. Looking forward to Mythbusters proving this once and for all, even though it seems so basic.

  25. #550
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    336
    $100 (or beer equivalent) says the plane will not take off.
    Last edited by Provocyclist; 01-18-2008 at 12:53 PM. Reason: upping your ante.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •