Check Out Our Shop
Page 166 of 181 FirstFirst ... 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 ... LastLast
Results 4,126 to 4,150 of 4502

Thread: New Season, New Tires, New Thread

  1. #4126
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    Quote Originally Posted by SJG View Post
    maxxis runs smaller than advertised. I'd run 2.4".
    I would if I could.
    Options are 2.3 or 2.5
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  2. #4127
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    Think I've settled on the Aggressor.
    Next question, I generally go 2.6 Front/2.4 Rear
    Aggressor has either 2.3 or 2.5WT. Do these tend to run big or small?
    I was going to recommend a Specialized Ground Control... I've got one on the back of my Smuggler for more "mellow" Front Range and High Country riding (but I've also ridden it on some super rocky terrain too), and it's great. Rolls fast and has plenty of traction in dry conditions.

  3. #4128
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction Co
    Posts
    1,092
    I’ve run both by like the 2.3 aggressor. I use the 2.5 sometimes but it rolls quite a bit slower as the gaps between the tread get bigger. Part of why I like the aggressor is that it rolls fast but corners nicely on firm ground.

    The 2.5 doesn’t corner better and rolls slower. Run 2psi more in the 2.3 and call it a day.

    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    I would if I could.
    Options are 2.3 or 2.5

  4. #4129
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,783
    If you ride a lot of loose over hard, the aggressor is a little lacking in braking traction IMO. I prefer the dissector out back for that reason.

    On a slightly related note, my spur came with a dissector up front, I've been pleasantly surprised with the traction. I'll throw a DHF or maybe a Kenda Pinner on at some point to compare.

  5. #4130
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,117
    My issue with the Aggressor was that the cornering knobs undercut really quickly, and they’re somewhat small to start with, so cornering traction became an issue with relatively low miles.

    (This was a 2.3, and several years back FWIW.)

  6. #4131
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    My issue with the Aggressor was that the cornering knobs undercut really quickly, and they’re somewhat small to start with, so cornering traction became an issue with relatively low miles.

    (This was a 2.3, and several years back FWIW.)
    That’s really no different than the Dissector or DHF though [emoji12]
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  7. #4132
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LV-426
    Posts
    21,744
    I think the Aggressor is more durable than the Dissector. Isn't the Aggressor dual compound, and Dissector 3C?

    Both have side knobs that undercut pretty fast, but that doesn't bother me so much on a rear tire, at least not as fast as it bothers me on a front tire. The Dissector wears out in the center much quicker than the Aggressor when used as a rear tire.

    If I had someone supplying free tires every month, I'd be fine with a Dissector as a rear tire. Performs well.
    Quote Originally Posted by powder11 View Post
    if you have to resort to taking advice from the nitwits on this forum, then you're doomed.

  8. #4133
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction Co
    Posts
    1,092
    I’ve actually been super happy with the aggressor for wear and tear. I live out in the desert and got around 200 miles out of a dissector in the rear before it was destroyed. Very different with soft dirt but rock shreds them visibly each ride.

    The aggressor I actually really just want a Maxxterra Exo+ model and I’ll be happy. Dual is a “fine” but notably less sticky. More like 700-800 miles as a rear for me with an aggressor and they still look “fine” but just don’t perform as well.

  9. #4134
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Quote Originally Posted by El Chupacabra View Post
    I think the Aggressor is more durable than the Dissector. Isn't the Aggressor dual compound, and Dissector 3C?

    Both have side knobs that undercut pretty fast, but that doesn't bother me so much on a rear tire, at least not as fast as it bothers me on a front tire. The Dissector wears out in the center much quicker than the Aggressor when used as a rear tire.

    If I had someone supplying free tires every month, I'd be fine with a Dissector as a rear tire. Performs well.
    Totally agree with you and Tailwind. The Dissector 3CMT chunks off the center knobs under aggressive braking and undercuts the corner knobs under aggressive cornering. The Aggressor (only comes in DC I think) shows cornering wear inside the blocks, but really the rubber starts getting firm and holds its shape / looks reasonable but starts to feel not so grippy as it ages.

    I have yet to try the Dissector DC, and now that the Conti Xynotal looks like a promising replacement I probably never will.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  10. #4135
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    Posts
    559
    Conti Xynotal is everything you wish a Dissector was. Been running it in Enduro Soft on AZ hardpack and rocks. Off-camber traction is on point and it isn't destroyed after a couple hundred miles. Rolls fast, brakes decent.

    Haven't tried Trail casing yet, really like the Enduro casing out back.

  11. #4136
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    670
    I do like the Conti tires a lot, but they suck in the cold OR wet. Just know that going in. Most of my riding is dry so "priorities", but I do suffer a little in the Spring and Fall when things damp up and get cold. By "cold" I mean below 45F, the rubber is quite hard and has little traction. Anything damp/wet and I'm skating.

    I run the Kryptotal F&R and Xynotal, on my 2 bikes, both enduro casings. Wife has Kryptotal on trail casings.
    Last edited by SJG; 04-19-2024 at 04:34 PM.

  12. #4137
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Thanks for the heads up on that! I run Hillbillies when it’s that cold.
    Though it’s a reminder of a ride I did in November when my friends’ claim of “only 1-2” of snow above 6k” turned out to be 4+” above 6k and 2” down to 5k, also cold enough for MTB face shots. I didn’t have any issues with a T7 Butcher front and rear but my friend said his Assegai (presume 3CMT) was incredibly sketchy and had very little traction.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  13. #4138
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    Posts
    559
    I haven't experienced any traction issues in cold or wet, but I am running DH SuperSoft fronts. I've tried Kryptotal Front and Kryptotal Rear (as front). Also, only a few Sedona rides when it's in the 40s.

  14. #4139
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,023
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    I have the 2.4 (older ones were 2.35). Just measured it at 60.5mm for the casing, 60mm at the tread.

    Haven’t ridden yet this year, so not fully pumped up, though it does still feel fairly firm.
    Oh, I didn't realize there was more sizing. I see.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  15. #4140
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,783
    I guess my memory is worse than I thought. I ran a dissector year for a while years ago and thought I just switched to the aggressor because it was faster rolling. I remember now that you guys are right, the dissector does not last long!

    Thanks for the xynotal beta, gonna try a set of those when I wear out the OE Maxxis's. Will a trail casing be fine up front on a downcountry bike? I have a big bike too, but most riding around here is a little chunky.

  16. #4141
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    Posts
    559
    Trail casing only comes with Endurance compound (like Maxxis Dual Compound) currently. New Revel Ranger comes with Trail Soft front/rear. I'd wait for those to hit retail if I were you.

  17. #4142
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,783
    Quote Originally Posted by BigHerm View Post
    Trail casing only comes with Endurance compound (like Maxxis Dual Compound) currently. New Revel Ranger comes with Trail Soft front/rear. I'd wait for those to hit retail if I were you.
    Good to know, thanks.

  18. #4143
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Down In A Hole, Up in the Sky
    Posts
    36,513
    I am still on the hunt for a DH casing tire that is 2.6-2.8. (27.5) Ebike don’t G.A.F. how heavy it is.
    Forum Cross Pollinator, gratuitously strident

  19. #4144
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    Ended up going with the 2.5 and glad I did. As was said elsewhere, it's true to Maxxis sizing, IOW way small.
    It's dwarfed by the 2.6 Hellkat up front.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  20. #4145
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    Ended up going with the 2.5 and glad I did. As was said elsewhere, it's true to Maxxis sizing, IOW way small.
    It's dwarfed by the 2.6 Hellkat up front.
    In fairness to maxxis, it's not so much that maxxis runs small, it's that pretty much every other brand runs big.

    Every maxxis tire I have measures very close to the stated size. Most of the non-maxxis tires I have measure bigger than stated.

  21. #4146
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,617
    Quote Originally Posted by rideit View Post
    I am still on the hunt for a DH casing tire that is 2.6-2.8. (27.5) Ebike don’t G.A.F. how heavy it is.
    Have you tried the Vittoria Mazza 2.6? Their enduro casing falls right between a DD and DH ime.

  22. #4147
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    In fairness to maxxis, it's not so much that maxxis runs small, it's that pretty much every other brand runs big.

    Every maxxis tire I have measures very close to the stated size. Most of the non-maxxis tires I have measure bigger than stated.
    The 2.5WT on a 31mm inner width rim, measured at 2.28".
    Not too bad but not good.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  23. #4148
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    The 2.5WT on a 31mm inner width rim, measured at 2.28".
    Not too bad but not good.
    Casing or knobs? I think maxxis measures at the knobs while some other brands measure at the casing.

    I don't have any aggressors mounted up, but the dhf's, dhr2's, and assegais in my garage all measure accurately, or a bit big (measured at the widest point of the knobs).

    (Not saying that the aggressor isn't undersized - the 2.3 that I had was more like a 2.25).

  24. #4149
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Casing or knobs?
    Casing
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  25. #4150
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,468
    Looking for faster rolling rubber than my assegai/DHR combo in maxterra. I'm toying with the idea of aggressor/dissector. Or DHR/dissector...cor ho-hum pnw trail riding. Is this dumb? The alternative is Conti's hardest kryptotal w their Xytotal in the rear. The bike sees only trail duty and this move would result in a dedicated wet wheelset to swap out at will...

    Also, the guy at the shop told me to go insert if/when I upgrade wheels. I have never flatted out in my life (fingers crossed). Insert go more slow, no?

    Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •