Yes, you are right; I could.
Problem is I care a great deal about how my images are presented—especially if someone is going to bother to print it. I work with specific printshops who can handle a color-managed workflow. Most (inexpensive) 3rd party services cannot do that; instead they often alter colors based on certain standards of how light or dark a scene is supposed to be. That works particularly poorly with snowy shots. (I also care about how it's framed, too)
Most of the work I print for people is 25-60" on the long dimension. Not all print services can handle that. This stuff has IMPACT when printed huge.
Kind of makes me sad when it is (mostly) viewed 2"x2" on small screens, but the advantage is more folks get to see it I guess. Much of that impact and the detail is lost. So it goes.
Thank you! Insane day today, too!
I do paid work for brands. I'm not super interested in the low cost stuff. It's a bunch of effort for people who mostly prefer to get things for free — just a sign they don't value the art the way I do. Our values aren't aligned and that's OK....
Lose money but make up for it in volume (hah!) is not my approach.![]()
Mostly I just enjoy time in the mountains, taking photos of my partners, and providing stoke.
My partner today:
I like this image because it isn't the hockey-stop, basket-pointed-at-the-sun trend that tried to trick the viewer into thinking conditions are deeper than they are. Even though I'll never meet most people who see my work, I want to respect their intelligence.
My mentors put emphasis on a quiet upper body and the pole plant. Seems to be a bit of a lost art. Times change!
Was nuking when these shots were taken (here's a view from further away)... shooting through that much snow always means less clarity.
![]()
Bookmarks