Sounds like someone should sign up for the email list
But the FL113 will take more speed to come alive and is more directional where the R110 will be quicker to pivot and more surfy. The FR110 will be another full step-change more surfy and pivoty than the R110 and will do even better in wet pow.
But all are going to be super smooth, and nicely responsive
You're a goddamn genius. Exactly what I was hoping to hear... something between the FL113 and the FR110. Cheers.
Need something for 'tweener days... those days here in JP that aren't dedicated forests or groomers, but dabbling in both. And can also serve Hakuba side country. Was looking for something with this rocker profile and when you said Ren & Mfree 108 made a baby, I kind of freaked out a little bit. I haven't been able to decide between FL113 and FR110.
There were a few other skis on my list, but this finishes my thinking.
I'll work on it. I wasn't prepared to buy skis right now.
(and email list signed... my bad ;-)
Oh great. More email. Just what I need.
I have been half paying attention and I’m trying to pull together what the hell is going on with the R110. I didn’t pull the trigger on FR110 earlier because I bought a bunch of other stuff like a car and a wife and then Christmas and honestly the graphics didn’t really do it for me for an already bloated quiver spot, but I’m paying attention again.
What’s the timeline on those guys? Dimensions/specs? Take my money.
ETA: oh I see now. Thanks for the breadcrumbs gaijin. Hum….
focus.
I have a grievance, Marshal.
Your website says the 110 are $699 in the category listing but then when I go to the product page it tells me $700.
This is truth in advertising shenanigans and I demand my $1.00 plus appropriate punitive damages.
focus.
In the "R" column on the Mount Distance Table on the FR110 page, there is a 180cm and 193cm size... will the 193 R110 be available in Fall 2024?
Late to the party.
Wasn't paying proper attention to Marshal's cutting edge shenanigans but just snuck in under the wire.
Picked either the second to last, or the last one!
That rocker profile looks perfect to me. (for a ski like this).
How are peeps finding the durability on these skis? Skiing Bridger bowl right now is a commitment to hitting rocks if you want to have fun. So I keep telling myself I’m gonna keep them on the shelf until we get a 30 inch base. But I’m itching to start skiing them and realistically I’m still gonna hit a ton of rocks when we get to 30 inches. Should I just become the durability tester??? Or will patience pay off for this old grasshopper?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’d say give’r
They are put together as well as anything
And if you crunch a ski badly, I’ll take good care of you
Durability is the best I've ever seen, with the FR builds (not enough days on the C builds to really comment). I know I'm biased as fuuck, but these are up there with Igneous skis, which is about the highest standard I know.
Sent fra min LE2123 via Tapatalk
I hit a few rocks at Snowbird in early December, and skis held up just fine. Gummy stone took off the burrs, bases merely had some surface scratches not even worth filling.
But, didn’t bring them to Tahoe this weekend…
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
I was bouncing off rocks up in Revy back in December, and hit one with my FL105s that would have destroyed every other ski in my quiver -- along with most likely my knee -- but they kept on trucking. Slapped some ptex in there and back at it. Both the FR and FL are insanely well built.
I’ve had a couple pair of PMGear skis that came out of the Blossom factory and they are bomber construction. I imagine the HL stuff is too, top shelf quality.
Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
I mounted my FR110s at -6. They are perfect there for me. I skied the og devastator for years and this ski floats much better. So intuitive and smooth, I can’t see a need for further back
Bookmarks