Check Out Our Shop
Page 40 of 53 FirstFirst ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... LastLast
Results 976 to 1,000 of 1311

Thread: The 300g Touring Binding Thread

  1. #976
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    No longer somewhere in Idaho
    Posts
    2,097
    Quote Originally Posted by rigbone View Post
    I'm looking to go brakeless with my Salomon MTNs, does anyone know if I can use the ATK freeride spacer as a stomp pad? I'm looking at the universal freeride spacer on BDs website, does it just get attached directly to the ski in front of the heel rails?

    Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
    I have this setup on mine, and yes.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Gravity always wins...

  2. #977
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Posts
    71
    Quote Originally Posted by riff View Post
    I have this setup on mine, and yes.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Can I reuse the original screws or do I need to get smaller ones?

    Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk

  3. #978
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by Cocximus View Post
    The Trab Vario2 ski incredibly well. Even on terrible early-season refrozen slush, they are nearly indistinguishable from Vipecs. Good retention even with an offset mount that I have yet to fix. Remind me why is everyone fucking around with different heels on this winner?
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    Good fucking question. Seems like people want more riser options and adjustable release, but they would be better off just using the trab heels.
    So I'm the only one in this thread who's actually done/doing this, as far as I know. There are a few reasons:
    1. the freeride spacer! sure, I could mess around with the old ATK "universal" freeride spacer on the Vario.2, like the one guy who left the detailed review of the Vario.2 on skimo.co did but ... why?
    2. not having to rotate to switch between medium and high riser heights
    3. adjustable lateral/vertical release
    4. higher available release values

    The flippable risers are big deal to me personally because I have limited ankle ROM and a knee injury (posterior joint capsule, from hyperextending it at the top of a heavy back squat). It's mostly healed now, but it's sensitive to riser height over the course of multiple long touring days. I also run my RV higher than the "9-11" max on the Vario.2.

    YMMV of course, and what matters to me might not matter to you. I can make the argument in favor of the Vario.2 heel for sure. Especially for softer skis where the gapless makes more of a difference as the ski flexes. I can also make the argument in favor of the Speed Superlight 2.0 heel, if you wanna go even lighter. Different strokes. I'll reiterate that I would buy a "Vario.3" in a heartbeat if it came with flippable risers, and a freeride spacer. Or if ATK went gapless with more lateral elasticity.

    Anyway, I've skied these quite a lot now with the toes unlocked, including skiing pretty fast and hitting some sizeable airs. Nothing huge, but maybe 25-30 feet at speed (aka "Colorado 40 footer"). Some overhead Monashee blower, some Colorado windboard/breakable crust nonsense, and most everything in between (suncrust, mank, boot-deep pow, heavy pow, etc).

    After I started clearing my boot heel tech fittings from snow (thanks for the tip, norseman), I've had zero additional pre-releases with the toes unlocked. I have had one release when I hit a rock hard. The ski fully released from heel and toe. I sprained my ankle (jammed, not twisted) and coreshot my new skis, but I'm not sure a different binding would/could have behaved better. I had one other fall when I went over the bars on landing maybe a 15 foot air, but skis stayed on and I skied away after a lil somersault.

    I'm sure the Vipec/Tecton has better release characteristics, but these are half the weight and ski very well. The freeride spacer gives me some confidence I won't blow up the pins on landing. Also, it *seems* that the freeride space provides slightly better vertical power transfer when using your tails as landing gear or trying to get tips up quickly to get over a sightly-buried log. Of course, your heel isn't locked down the same as with a Tecton or Kingpin, but these quick motions I'm discussing are just downward pressure on the heel in powder.

    Anyway, I like these enough that I'm seriously debating Tectons vs these for a wider pow touring setup. I definitely the appeal of the Tecton, especially for throwing spins/flips, but I can't help but wonder if the additional 300g wouldn't be better felt in the ski vs the binding.
    Last edited by auvgeek; 12-17-2022 at 06:46 PM.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  4. #979
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,757
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    I'll reiterate that I would buy a "Vario.3" in a heartbeat if it came with flippable risers, and a freeride spacer. Or if ATK went gapless with more lateral elasticity.
    I am totally onboard with this notion.
    Last edited by Lord Thomas; 12-19-2022 at 06:30 AM.

  5. #980
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    So I'm the only one in this thread who's actually done/doing this, as far as I know.
    Nah dude, I'm rolling with the Traider too!

    Just the other day I skied for the first time on a Vario 2. I threw my ATK heels in the pack too to do a comparison (inserts of course).

    I did two runs before ditching the Varios. No dramas with function or elasticity...it was more about the point of contact with the boot. What I mean is that when I ski my ATK heel, when I push down through my boot the Freeride spacer is where the power is being transferred. With the Vario, it was much higher (as in the back of the heel where the insert is). Basically, I felt like I was skiing in high heels (pretty similar to the ramp angle I experienced with the Xenic).

    It may not ski quite as great as a Tecton, but at less than half the weight, the Traider is maybe the best lightweight combo that I've skied on (and that's on skis like Commander Tour and the proper Corvus).

  6. #981
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sun Valley, ID
    Posts
    2,635
    Quote Originally Posted by thecazdog View Post
    Nah dude, I'm rolling with the Traider too!

    Just the other day I skied for the first time on a Vario 2. I threw my ATK heels in the pack too to do a comparison (inserts of course).

    I did two runs before ditching the Varios. No dramas with function or elasticity...it was more about the point of contact with the boot. What I mean is that when I ski my ATK heel, when I push down through my boot the Freeride spacer is where the power is being transferred. With the Vario, it was much higher (as in the back of the heel where the insert is). Basically, I felt like I was skiing in high heels (pretty similar to the ramp angle I experienced with the Xenic).

    It may not ski quite as great as a Tecton, but at less than half the weight, the Traider is maybe the best lightweight combo that I've skied on (and that's on skis like Commander Tour and the proper Corvus).
    This is probably buried earlier but what is the point in running the Trab toe? Why not just run the full ATK binder?

    Does the trab toe have some (meaningful) elasticity?

  7. #982
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    90
    It's a shame Dynafit doesn't offer the Rotation toe with a lighter elastic travel heel piece. The Rotation has by far the most consistent release among all tech bindings (read the SkiAlper survey from a few years ago) and skis great.


    I was running the Rotation toe with Marker Alpinist heels for a while before I lost one of the skis to the North face of the Aiguille du Midi. Was a sweet setup. Zero ramp angle too. Just too expensive to replace, sadly.

  8. #983
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,975
    Maybe the rotation has consistent release.
    In France, a lot of shops refuse to sell it, because of many prereleases.

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

  9. #984
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks auvgeek for the detailed review!

  10. #985
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by thecazdog View Post

    I did two runs before ditching the Varios. No dramas with function or elasticity...it was more about the point of contact with the boot. What I mean is that when I ski my ATK heel, when I push down through my boot the Freeride spacer is where the power is being transferred. With the Vario, it was much higher (as in the back of the heel where the insert is). Basically, I felt like I was skiing in high heels (pretty similar to the ramp angle I experienced with the Xenic).
    I don't understand why you feel a difference in ramp angle when the heel pin heights are 43mm and 44mm respectively. https://skimo.co/pin-heights

  11. #986
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    Maybe the rotation has consistent release.
    In France, a lot of shops refuse to sell it, because of many prereleases.

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk
    They should reconsider if that's actually the case. Look at what Nikolai Schirmer gets up to with unlocked Rotation toes. I've run the rotating toe for over 4 years and have never prereleased. The rotating toe reduces the chances of prerelease significantly. I do lock them out when above exposure but that's standard practice with all tech bindings.

  12. #987
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Side WA
    Posts
    623
    Rotation bindings ski great and tour fine. They are just heavy. I had a friend whose heel elastic travel got stuck, so they probably also benefit from occasionally removing the heel piece and greasing the spring.

  13. #988
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Benneke10 View Post
    I don't understand why you feel a difference in ramp angle when the heel pin heights are 43mm and 44mm respectively. https://skimo.co/pin-heights
    I hear you and thought I'd be happy on the Vario 2 as well (ramp angle is similar to other bindings I like). But like I said, the point at which forces are transferred is very different between the Vario and the ATK - with a free ride spacer the pins can be taking much less of the load on the ATK.

    And yes, the Trab Gara Titan/Vario toe does have more elasticity in a super lightweight package...looks like some of the latest ATK stuff will have adjustable elasticity at the toe, but before that I had been rattled out of ATK toe pieces on very firm and icy snow.

  14. #989
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    404
    I just hacked together a Trab toe and a Yak heel. I call it the Trak.

    Ramp angle is a tad high, but I'm ok with that compromise. To be field tested in a few weeks...

  15. #990
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Driggs
    Posts
    549
    I'm pretty interested in the Titan 2, is there any chance someone who has a pair could measure the delta between the top of the highest riser and the center of the heel pins? Trying to figure out how high that riser actually is. Thanks!

  16. #991
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    860
    Hey Cy, can’t verify this myself, but Skimo has a good page with riser heights and deltas from the center of the toe pins here https://skimo.co/binding-riser-heights


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  17. #992
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Driggs
    Posts
    549
    Quote Originally Posted by Skeeze View Post
    Hey Cy, can’t verify this myself, but Skimo has a good page with riser heights and deltas from the center of the toe pins here https://skimo.co/binding-riser-heights


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I'm an idiot, I knew this page existed, bust just couldn't find it. Thanks!

  18. #993
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Golden, Colorado
    Posts
    5,879
    Quote Originally Posted by JackSkier View Post
    They should reconsider if that's actually the case. Look at what Nikolai Schirmer gets up to with unlocked Rotation toes. I've run the rotating toe for over 4 years and have never prereleased. The rotating toe reduces the chances of prerelease significantly. I do lock them out when above exposure but that's standard practice with all tech bindings.
    It doesn't in my experience, lateral hits near the toepiece, which happens when skiing hard angulations in firm rough snow, still cause prerelease. Nikolai skis powder mostly. You aren't going to see prereleases in the conditions he's skiing (and where he's going mostly straight).

    The rotation really only helps for consistent release when the lateral release forces happen further back in the ski towards/past the heel.

  19. #994
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,643
    I saw this in la sportiva sytron specs.

    S4 toe inserts help guide the boot into a tech toe, but also allow hands free step-in capabilities with the Ski Trab Gara bindings.

    That would make the trab toe the ultimate light binding. There's not much info on those inserts, and it looks like the new boots don't have them.

  20. #995
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Breckenridge
    Posts
    726
    I just rediscovered the Kreuzspitze GT and EL bindings, particularly the clever way the heel adjusts vertical release. I was fawning over the Dynafit Mezzalama heel only to discover it has been done that way for quite some time.

    I like brakes for my transitions on harder snow and the tops of lines, I think my present ideal setup might be:
    Trab toes, GT 2.0 heels, Plum adjustment plates with the optional brake hole in the front(not presently made) and Plum brakes for Oazo bindings.

  21. #996
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by Cocximus View Post

    That would make the trab toe the ultimate light binding. There's not much info on those inserts, and it looks like the new boots don't have them.
    The Skorpius also has these inserts. You need a very flat surface to step in without pressing the lever, and I pretty much always use the lever. They do probably make the bindings easier to step into overall. Skorpius and Trab are a great combo but you can't just get into the bindings hands free in most situations.

  22. #997
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,643
    Too bad most of my lines are 50°+.

    If anyone wants to do QC beware the toe screws head is smaller than dynafits. They measure 7.8mm vs dynafit 8.3. I hope the head angle is the same or some other fuckery.

  23. #998
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Driggs
    Posts
    549
    Thanks to this thread I finally figured out (I think, for now) my ultimate do-it-all binding combo: Trab toe, ATK Haute route heel, homemade freeride spacer. Skied it Saturday on the big skis in a variety of snow conditions and was really impressed. Two spacer heights, elastic travel in the heel, Trab toes feel so good, and all sub 180g. I am not a precise or smooth skier at all, and I hit a reasonably big air, into a pretty crappy landing, late in the day when my legs were fried, and came away so impressed at how the bindings felt.

    So basically... If anybody wants to buy a pair of Trab Titan Vario 2 heels with one day on them, let me know! They're sick, but I don't need them haha.

  24. #999
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    ^^ Awesome. I love what we're seeing for sub 200g options.

    I would personally choose the Superlight 2.0 heel over the Haute Route heel because it has noticeably better "return to center" force. My wife skis the Haute Route heel, and it's definitely nice too -- the independent release and easy step-in are definitely appealing over the SSL 2.0 heel.

    I'm glad we have another trab toe convert. Do you have a link to that homemade freeride spacer? I could see adding it to my skis that already have the Trab Toe + SSL 2.0 heel.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  25. #1000
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Driggs
    Posts
    549
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    ^^ Awesome. I love what we're seeing for sub 200g options.

    I would personally choose the Superlight 2.0 heel over the Haute Route heel because it has noticeably better "return to center" force. My wife skis the Haute Route heel, and it's definitely nice too -- the independent release and easy step-in are definitely appealing over the SSL 2.0 heel.

    I'm glad we have another trab toe convert. Do you have a link to that homemade freeride spacer? I could see adding it to my skis that already have the Trab Toe + SSL 2.0 heel.

    Honestly, only reason I didn't go Suuperlight 2.0 heel is because I forgot Dynafit made bindings haha. Been so ATK centered for the last few years. Maybe I'll go with those for the other skis if I can sell my Trab heels. (Buy them somebody! They're sick, only reason I don't want them is because I've got messed up ankles that require a super flat ramp!)

    The spacer is just a piece of polyethylene cutting board, cut to be about 10cm by 1.5 cm, just tall enough that I can slip a sheet of paper between it and the boot. IDK about safety, but for power transmission, it's awesome.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •