Check Out Our Shop
Page 515 of 626 FirstFirst ... 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 ... LastLast
Results 12,851 to 12,875 of 15626

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #12851
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Driving2VT
    Posts
    4,858

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by benk View Post
    What’s the consensus on the OG Billy Goat? My dad hasn’t skied his in years and probably won’t again. 118mm waist slows his turns down too much I guess. I’m thinking of throwing a cheap pair of bindings on them for kicks or putting some feelers out there if anyone wants a collection piece
    Mount ‘em up. I still enjoy mine on the rare occasion I get them out. Tight balance point likely due to the extremity of the pin tail but quick, slashy and stable at speed. Likely pale in comparison to modern day Goats but still a great ski imho.

    Wren 102s arrived today. Stoked!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	68453893747__60057BAE-EEA8-45A4-A423-299B3FC8A325.JPG 
Views:	167 
Size:	152.5 KB 
ID:	426080
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	68453897377__A34C9D67-DB2C-4E18-AE6A-B3869AE11ECD.JPG 
Views:	164 
Size:	152.9 KB 
ID:	426081
    Uno mas

  2. #12852
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Moose, Iowa
    Posts
    8,114
    The OG Billy Goats are super fun on powder days. They are super twitchy on hard pack, especially flat cat walks back to the lift. The pigtail can get hooked up on crud under pow and that was sketchy for me at least. Runout into the trees whoops.

    As long as the snow is soft, they are dynamic, can absolutely haul ass if you ski them center, or you can power the tips and slash and burn.

    I still have mine unmounted in the basement. I had some of the best lines of my life on them when I was still really strong and in my prime so tough to part with those memories...but my 16/17's are just as good in the pow and totally predictable and carveable on groomers so you don't have to be like screw this and go trade out skis at noon.

    Both versions absolutely devour chop.

    Sent from my SM-G991U1 using Tapatalk

  3. #12853
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Doremite View Post
    Wren 102s arrived today. Stoked!
    Holy jeebus. Praaaise!

  4. #12854
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by uglymoney View Post
    ...They are super twitchy on hard pack, especially flat cat walks back to the lift....
    In the 3 days I had (60"+ in 72 hours) on my new BG118's (2022's) last season, I had this same experience. Scared the bejeesus out of me since I'm used to my fat skis being suuuuper casual, buttery, and dare I say wet-noodley (2010 S7's). Anytime I was on a cat track or groomer without chop on it, I was borderline scared to turn lol.

  5. #12855
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,128
    Quote Originally Posted by WILLSKIFAST View Post
    In the 3 days I had (60"+ in 72 hours) on my new BG118's (2022's) last season, I had this same experience. Scared the bejeesus out of me since I'm used to my fat skis being suuuuper casual, buttery, and dare I say wet-noodley (2010 S7's). Anytime I was on a cat track or groomer without chop on it, I was borderline scared to turn lol.
    Check the base bevel…

  6. #12856
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    565
    Agreed, I had only skied the 09/10 BG a few times but remember catching a few edges on hardpack in the middle of some otherwise fun skiing. I’ll probably keep them hung up for now

  7. #12857
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by sf View Post
    Check the base bevel…
    plz forgive my ignorance...how do I do that?

  8. #12858
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by benk View Post
    Agreed, I had only skied the 09/10 BG a few times but remember catching a few edges on hardpack in the middle of some otherwise fun skiing. I’ll probably keep them hung up for now
    The OG Goats are one of the WORST skis I have ever skied. Total garbage. The fact that I am such a BG fan after that first iteration is a testament to how much better the ski became with RES, less camber, etc.

    Keep them as wall art.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  9. #12859
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    The OG Goats are one of the WORST skis I have ever skied. Total garbage. The fact that I am such a BG fan after that first iteration is a testament to how much better the ski became with RES, less camber, etc.
    agreed.

  10. #12860
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,785
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    Holy jeebus. Praaaise!
    Right. Those things are gorgeous!

  11. #12861
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,177
    08 Billy Goats (4 pairs only) worked great for those four skiers
    09/10 Billy Goats didn’t work - but I have skied worse
    10/11 were fine (less camber and some sidecut adjustments IIRC(
    11/12 had a early RES in 191 only
    12/13 had better RES throughout and really defined the brand

  12. #12862
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,128
    Quote Originally Posted by WILLSKIFAST View Post
    plz forgive my ignorance...how do I do that?
    You need a truebar and google. Or just have them tuned. I think it’s pretty certain that’s the problem.

    QC on tuning seem to have been pretty bad the last two years, if you read through the thread you’ll find plenty of similar experiences to yours.

    My last two pairs have been without base bevels

  13. #12863
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    Melee mentioned something interesting in the Moment thread:

    Quote Originally Posted by Melee View Post
    They used to be 1/1...

    Skis now come with a 1 degree side bevel and a 1.5 degree base bevel.

    Additionally, for 22/23 we have a new de-tuning procedure for the tips and tails. We are still det-uning the same area but have a new machine that does the job better, faster and is more repeatable so we can ensure we are getting a solid de-tune every single time.
    Quote Originally Posted by Melee View Post
    It's actually always been close to 1/1.5 but now we run the skis through the base edge process multiple times to ensure we are achieving a 1.5 degree base bevel every single time.

    This process change was modified sometime last winter.
    Quote Originally Posted by Melee View Post
    The machine has always been setup for a 1.5 degree base bevel although it typically yielded a result closer to 1.1 - 1.2.

    We find people complain that wide skis are hooky if we dont go 1.3+

    All skis under 108 underfoot get 1/1.1 - 1.2
    So I speculate that the culprit here is the new Reichmann tuning machine that has been introduced the last couple of years not yielding as precise detunes (due to production tolerances) as the previous by hand process. Perhaps Melee's approach ia applicable to the wider ON3Ps as well?

  14. #12864
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    I'll just say that detuning and setting proper base bevels are 2 different procedures. Simply detuning my affected skis would produce a result of 0

  15. #12865
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Deep in the heart of....
    Posts
    824
    I snagged these custom Jeff 110s from optics on here. Super excited to try these out. Not sure where they will fit in my quiver. Looking at new boots so just holding off mounting the bindings as my BSL might change between my Dalbellos and the K2s I want, and I’ll probably put pivots on here. Maybe.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1662997621.457413.jpg 
Views:	212 
Size:	1.55 MB 
ID:	426213

  16. #12866
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Hillsburrito
    Posts
    2,747
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    Melee mentioned something interesting in the Moment thread:





    So I speculate that the culprit here is the new Reichmann tuning machine that has been introduced the last couple of years not yielding as precise detunes (due to production tolerances) as the previous by hand process. Perhaps Melee's approach ia applicable to the wider ON3Ps as well?
    My information on this is that they seem to have found the culprit in the process that was causing the issue, and why it was not a consistent issue.
    Training for Alpental

  17. #12867
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Where full grown men pretend to be cowboys
    Posts
    637
    Quote Originally Posted by Sessiøn View Post
    My information on this is that they seem to have found the culprit in the process that was causing the issue, and why it was not a consistent issue.
    Samesies. Iggy's got it figured now.

    However, I do agree with Melee on the merit of a 1.5 base bevel on wider skis. Always done it on my goats for increased loosey goosiness. First started doing it on the Bodacious per the rec of a Bliz team guy, made even more of a difference there.

  18. #12868
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    A little to the left
    Posts
    2,361
    Quote Originally Posted by sf View Post
    My last two pairs have been without base bevels
    wow...

  19. #12869
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    7,269
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuntmonkey View Post
    I snagged these custom Jeff 110s from optics on here. Super excited to try these out. Not sure where they will fit in my quiver. Looking at new boots so just holding off mounting the bindings as my BSL might change between my Dalbellos and the K2s I want, and I’ll probably put pivots on here. Maybe.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1662997621.457413.jpg 
Views:	212 
Size:	1.55 MB 
ID:	426213
    Congrats on picking those up. I love those topsheets, but since I have Jeff 108s I couldn't justify essentially the same ski...

    But they are so damn sweet.

  20. #12870
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    659
    Wowsers

    Sent from my SM-F721U1 using Tapatalk

  21. #12871
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,975
    Quote Originally Posted by lrn2swim View Post
    Wowsers

    Sent from my SM-F721U1 using Tapatalk
    So hawt!

  22. #12872
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    394
    Quote Originally Posted by sf View Post
    My last two pairs have been without base bevels
    Have a pair of BG118s that need to get mounted for this season. Ended up ordering and not skiing last year (don't have kids). Sounds like I should just get them tuned when I mount them. Yes, I know, mount your own damn skis, but ... man, I have tried that, and a random kid in a shop with a jig is 10x better at it than me.

  23. #12873
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,128
    Quote Originally Posted by theetruscan View Post
    Have a pair of BG118s that need to get mounted for this season. Ended up ordering and not skiing last year (don't have kids). Sounds like I should just get them tuned when I mount them. Yes, I know, mount your own damn skis, but ... man, I have tried that, and a random kid in a shop with a jig is 10x better at it than me.
    Just have them check the tune. It might be fine

  24. #12874
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by sf View Post
    Just have them check the tune. It might be fine
    I would ski them first before chasing red herrings.

  25. #12875
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Denial
    Posts
    2,747
    Pair of Woodsman 108s in the classifieds that got my attention. Looking for a new cleaup ski (day after a storm) so bumps, groomers, and terrain openings are all possible, I have a 116, and a 98 for pow and low tide.

    Whats the woodsman like?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •