I think it's more about finding out what they have in Baker. Both Stefanski and Berry made kind of a point about how Baker was going to finish the season strong. He didn't.
Stefanski is a control freak. He wants the passing game to be like the running game - no downside (no turnovers) and it's ok to have a limited upside because of that. Baker, at his heart, is more like Farve. Take his chances, throw a few picks, but score some points. I think Stefanski likes Baker because at his best he's highly accurate. Baker clearly does not like Stefanski's offense. A split may be coming.
Mary Kay Cabot, longtime Browns beat writer, wrote an article a month or so ago about how the Browns not only have to choose Baker, but Baker needs to choose the Browns. I'm thinking now that wasn't an accident or coincidence. I'm starting to think that came from Baker's camp. I think he may push for a trade.
If he's not mentally broken I still think he's a good QB, but may need a different system. I could see him and Landry both gone next year. I could see him doing quite well for another team, ala Stafford or Wentz, (or to a lesser extent Tannehill.)
Back to the question: I think Stefanski was feeling there were a few outcomes from playing Baker - he does great and gets past the last 4 INT game, he does poorly and it decreases the cost long term to the Browns to sign him, he does horribly and the Browns know it's time to move on.
Bookmarks