I wouldn't worry about the little snippet in the WSJ. Israel has a large number of vaccinated vs unvaxxed and their death rate is still nearly zero.
I was wondering about natural immunity and the Delta variant and also about the claim that the first vaccine dose only gives 33% protection as has been commonly reported as late as today. Turns out the 33% is from post vax to 14 days....NOT at 14 days, where protection will be much higher. Also no evidence of the Delta evading natural immunity. The evidence of it causing more severe disease is still anecdotal and has not been detected in studies that looked at this. They said the same thing about the UK strain and it proved to be no more lethal than the previous strains.Israel, with one of the world's most advanced vaccination campaigns largely based on the Pfizer-BioNTech shot, still lacks enough data to provide insight into vaccine effectiveness against the Delta variant, said Sharon Alroy-Preis, head of public health at Israel's Health Ministry.
"We are collecting the data now. We are only now seeing the first cases of the Delta variant in Israel - about 200 of those - so we will know more soon," she told reporters on Wednesday.
Click the link for article and then click and listen to audio, it includes more info.
https://wtop.com/coronavirus/2021/06...delta-variant/
Don't worry though, I'm reading new articles about a "Delta Plus" variant so the media has a new thing to keep us all scared once Delta just turns out to be a not-that-big-a-deal.
Canada has just released guidance on what you can and cannot do regarding your vaccine status:
https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ph...h-measures.pdf
I'll be printing this and posting it up in the backyard so any of our antivax dumb friends can adhere to it.
On the other hand, maybe AZ or Pfizer are not as effective on variants, what with two of the most vaxed countries in the world now experiencing relative surges.
Israel
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/...onavirus-spike
They do say that much of the uptick in Israel is in the unvaccinated young.
UK
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/25/uk-c...-in-cases.html
Bloody Brits are also weathering a Delta surge, with most measures on the rise.
Chile just officially detected the first Delta, promptly extended the travel ban to July 15, and is imposing more restrictions on entry. All in spite of falling cases and positivity. R is under 1 in most of the country. We hope the decline is as fast as Israels, as more youngsters are vaccinated and the hold-outs turn up for their shot. The pase movilidad is a great carrot. I can go stay at my place in the ski area now, take that anti vaxxer!
Interesting--the guy who used the 33% figure on PBS is Gandhi's boss.
The article that Gandhi quotes says this: "both vaccines [Pfizer and AZ] were 33% effective against symptomatic disease from B.1.617.2, 3 weeks after the first dose compared to around 50% effectiveness against the B.1.1.7 variant". That seems to support Wachter's statement. That doesn't mean single dose effectiveness couldn't continue to rise after 3 weeks. Effectiveness at 3 weeks doesn't mean effectiveness up to 3 weeks.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/v...-after-2-doses
With asymptomatic cases of delta showing up in vaccinated people, maybe the booster should be a nasal or inhaled vaccine. With the injected vaccine seeming to be very effective against getting sick with delta, the best way to prevent vaccinated people from being infected and transmitting might be to block the virus at the level of the first receptors--in the respiratory tract.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special...clusives/92527
This situation is similar to polio. The injected Salk vaccine and its descendants are very effective against getting sick with polio. The oral Sabin vaccine and its descendants are more effective at preventing transmission. (Polio transmission is fecal-oral.)
pure gravity needs to be careful with all his shit eating
Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
"Zee damn fat skis are ruining zee piste !" -Oscar Schevlin
"Hike up your skirt and grow a dick you fucking crybaby" -what Bunion said to Harry at the top of The Headwaters
So that's why he changed his nom de guerre to pure anti-gravity
We all have to eat shit at some time or other. Such is life![]()
OH, MY GAWD! ―John Hillerman Big Billie Eilish fan.
But that's a quibble to what PG posted (at first, anyway, I haven't read his latest book) ―jono
we are not arguing about ski boots or fashionable clothing or spageheti O's which mean nothing in the grand scheme ― XXX-er
Thanks for the analysis OG and pointing out the connection between the two, obviously I have no idea who is who. I'm swayed by her hopefulness I think and want to believe it is more effective than 33% after dose 1. I'm looking at her twitter now trying to find if she posted where Public Health England clarified but can't find anything. I did find this on her twitter https://twitter.com/MonicaGandhi9 which is extremely reassuring ie vaccines effectiveness against hospital admissions alpha vs delta. Not peer reviewed yet so take it with a grain of course but basicallly if this is all true vaccinated people remain really safe. Obviously this is apples and oranges and does not address the 33% statement at all.
https://media.tghn.org/articles/Effe...B._G6gnnqJ.pdf
Also she posted this article on natural immunity from May 28th. Maybe this has already been shared here.
https://www.medpagetoday.com/reading...diseases/92828
This is interesting in the question and answer. Yes, it is very protective. Yes you should still get the vax.
What differentiates your study from previous reports of COVID-19 reinfection?
Rothberg: Our study was the first to look at actual reinfection rates, not just antibody levels, among people in the general population. We found that reinfection was rare but did occur, and that patients with previous infections were about 80% less likely to test positive in coming months.
Since your study ended, have developments in the pandemic had any impact on the relevance of your findings?
Rothberg: We started this study back in January 2021 when there wasn't nearly enough vaccine, and it wasn't clear when there would be. That isn't the case anymore. Now the issue is getting people to accept the vaccines. Our study showed that reinfection is more common than previously expected, and infection doesn't offer the same protection that vaccination does. So even people who've been previously infected should get vaccinated, though it's possible they will only need one dose. In other countries, where there still isn't enough vaccine, it would make sense to prioritize vaccination for those who are at high risk of infection and have never had COVID-19.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You all have noticed that Wachter and Gandhi have been consistently interpreting the covid infection data differently and have been offering fairly different opinions regarding risk? They’ve been doing it for a while (maybe a year?). Gandhi has also been called out for cherry-picking her data.
I'm learning this. I think it helpful to have someone to balance out the alarmists but disappointed I can't find her reference to what she said about relative to the efficacy of dose 1. Without a pointer it is just more hearsay. That's why this place is cool.
On Twitter some Israeli reporter is claiming all the Delta positives amongst vaxxed are asymptomatic but no reference. Some people are showing a chart out of England showing 26 deaths amongst fully vaxxed with Delta but no idea if that is true or not.
Fascinating sifting through this stuff and I get smarter and then dumber depending. What I really want to know is how careful to be moving forward for my family...which includes an 11 yo unvaxxed. Murky waters to navigate ahead.
The message is that the closer you get to the raw data the closer you are to the truth. The closest most of us can get to the raw data is published peer-reviewed articles in reputable journals, although in a pandemic that may be too slow--hence preprints.
And even then . . . https://www.newyorker.com/science/el...mage-detective
Oh Jeebus; no worm cans, please. Living in the same house with Bik must be ...... interesting.
At least you wouldn't be tripping over her clothes on the floor.
We’re in the exact same situation at our home. I posted this in another thread. It’s useful and includes an infographic: https://yourlocalepidemiologist.subs...ted-activities
Guess who is suing her?
https://medium.com/beingwell/dr-elis...a-a2e73b1a554f
Yup. This fucking jackass.
![]()
Toronto just stuck a world wide record breaking 26,771 people at a single pop up today.
![]()
WTF is going on with his chin?!
Re the breakthrough rate discussion, a lot of the reporting looks like base-rate fallacy. It's obvious when you think about it, but counterintuitive at first glance: as a society becomes more fully vaccinated you should expect more stories about fully vaccinated adults becoming infected.
Attachment 378184
As the infographic above shows, this does not mean vaccines are ineffective. In fact, if we get to a point where most infections are happening among fully vaccinated individuals then depending on the circumstance that would be a good thing.
I agree with you that many journals need to improve their peer review process, but I don't think it would do most of us any good to get any closer than a peer-reviewed publication.
The closer a person gets to the truth, the less able they are to interpret it. Even scientists aren't able to understand raw data from outside their training. Ask a cell biologist to make heads or tails of a ellipsometry readout, or judge the quality of an experiment's NMR methodology, for instance.
I wish endeavors seeking to reproduce published experiments from other labs weren't so scoffed at by the scientific community and funding organizations. Validating results is as important as it is unsexy.
Bookmarks