Check Out Our Shop
Page 8 of 30 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... LastLast
Results 176 to 200 of 729

Thread: Gear rumors 19/20

  1. #176
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    interesting idea, but perhaps too much complexity / not required functionality for the majority of users making it a risky / potentially cost prohibitive investment for bootmakes - no?

  2. #177
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,913
    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    This is a great idea. Although I can see myself complaining I chose he wrong elastomer when the conditions or temps change, just like I complain when I am wearing my dark goggle lens and the clouds move in.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Read this and contemplated....figured out a solution...simple, just duct tape on a heat pack u use for gloves/boots and elastomer durometer rating should remain stable...figure out how much 'heat shielding' you need to transfer just the right amount of heat to keep it in the 'optimum' temp range?
    Master of mediocrity.

  3. #178
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,913
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    interesting idea, but perhaps too much complexity / not required functionality for the majority of users making it a risky / potentially cost prohibitive investment for bootmakes - no?
    Very good point...the point gignoux snowboard boot is a +/- $1 800 usd boot.

    Maybe i'm just an O.ski.D outlier at the extreme end of the bell curve who demands perfection and would be willing to pay $ for it?

    Taking a break from bending more tip rocker into my Armada JJ 2.0's... stock splay too low, was stabbing into a little breakable rain crust layer yesterday on little lumps and bumps...be the change you want to ski.
    Master of mediocrity.

  4. #179
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    34,005
    I had a pair of those Dynafits with the springs at the back and a knob to adjust them way back in the day. There was a whole bunch of friction at the cuff hinge, the springs may not have been in the right tension range and I found them under whelming
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  5. #180
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,913
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    I had a pair of those Dynafits with the springs at the back and a knob to adjust them way back in the day. There was a whole bunch of friction at the cuff hinge, the springs may not have been in the right tension range and I found them under whelming
    What terrain were u skiing those in though, XXX'er? inbounds groomers, bumps or did ya test em out in backcountry specific snow on fat skis? Different times, different factors, just sayin' if 'test' conditions were not of today's context.

    For example, in the era of skinny long skis, ya kinda really needed to drive the skis...these days with rockered fat, (sometimes) shorter and wider, you kinda wanna more massage the skis to do their own thing...for this to be optimal from a control and sensation standpoint, i just kinda think having that adjustable flex system would be cat's ass...maybe not springs, but sumthin. Just throwin' out ideas. Maybe using the housing for re engineering an elastomer based flex control system could be incorporated into a new paradigm shifting design. Just one factor of many. Dunno how the springs skied, but, I can imagine they gave some 'rebound' and were more lively and reactive. Personally, I'm not a fan of boots or skis that 'rebound' or 'react' to skiing input. I want 'em damp, predictable and 'boring'; I wanna be control on of the gear, not dynamically reacting to it. But I'm kinda old so there's that.

    Regarding the friction in the hinge...maybe that's before the era of bushings installed in the cuff pivots to induce less friction/stiction into the coupling? Dunno, just sayin' as a factor to consider?
    Master of mediocrity.

  6. #181
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Golden B.C.
    Posts
    651
    too bad about the Lupo Air not being a real 3 piece boot. Here is some info, that needs google translate, but is informative. Looks like some good offerings. https://www.backline-magazin.com/mar...hts-2019-2020/

  7. #182
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Los Angeles/Mammoth
    Posts
    1,407
    Quote Originally Posted by skisurfmirth View Post
    too bad about the Lupo Air not being a real 3 piece boot. Here is some info, that needs google translate, but is informative. Looks like some good offerings. https://www.backline-magazin.com/mar...hts-2019-2020/

    My German is mediocre, but I found two interesting little nuggets in there...

    "Die gesamte Lupo-Linie besteht aus den Modellen Lupo Air 130, Lupo Air 110, Lupo Factory, Lupo 130 C, Lupo AX 120, Lupo AX 105 W, Lupo AX 90 sowie zwei weiteren „Heavy Duty (HD)“ Modellen für intensivsten Einsatz: Lupo Pro HD und Lupo AX HD."

    Lupo Pro HD
    Lupo AX HD

    Heavy PU Lupos? Like the good ole days? I like the sound of that!

  8. #183
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    512
    Take this Dynastar fanbois - the new Proto Factory


  9. #184
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,184
    Ew.

    This years graphic is x1000 better.

    Does that say Menace Proto?

  10. #185
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by roQer View Post
    Take this Dynastar fanbois - the new Proto Factory

    Name:  scratch bc.jpg
Views: 2223
Size:  27.1 KB

  11. #186
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,184
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	line-mr-pollards-opus-skis-all14.jpg 
Views:	383 
Size:	593.3 KB 
ID:	264080

  12. #187
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    1,015
    What year is it?
    bumps are for poor people

  13. #188
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by nyskirat View Post
    Ew.

    This years graphic is x1000 better.

    Does that say Menace Proto?
    I guess they are finally done with the Legend Pro line...
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  14. #189
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,504
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    I guess they are finally done with the Legend Pro line...
    It’s all about selling skis to dentists.

  15. #190
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,799
    Quote Originally Posted by JRainey View Post
    Overheard a guy on a tram talking about his goggles, so I asked.

    Smith I/0 4D. Curved at the bottom so you can see your dick better, or your golfball... or snow.

    It was the European sales demo. Fucking puking at the top, raining at the bottom... a good day to test goggles.

    They also have Magnetz apparently.

    The was a new XL IO or something too, frameless, magnets. Looked comparable to I/0X, but the guy said they'd be cheaper.
    4D seems like valuable progression


  16. #191
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    I guess they are finally done with the Legend Pro line...
    Guess so.

    Sad. Those skis rock.

    I guess I'll need to buy this years Pro-To if I want a pair. Sure as hell not rocking that graphic

  17. #192
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Not Brooklyn
    Posts
    8,495
    Quote Originally Posted by nyskirat View Post
    Sure as hell not rocking that graphic
    I think it's a great graphic............ for a French monoski from 1988.

  18. #193
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    354
    PSA - 2nd tracks in Millcreek (SLC) had two pairs of the PRotos. The deal didn’t seem sensational to me but if they are hard-ish to get your hands on a pair it might be a good option.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  19. #194
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    voting in seattle
    Posts
    5,177
    Menace PROTO is the Factory Proto.

    Legend series remains, new graphics.

  20. #195
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    FR&CH
    Posts
    385


    Looks wide, 3D Ridge, maybe a wider 100Eight or something like that ?

  21. #196
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by stuntmanbo View Post


    Looks wide, 3D Ridge, maybe a wider 100Eight or something like that ?
    My guess is that is one of the new Mantra skis. Aren’t they expanding the line just like Nordica Enforcers? They look just a little wider than the bindings.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  22. #197
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    reply #85:
    Quote Originally Posted by poocher View Post
    Mantra-family

    five new models: Mantra 102, Secret 102, Kendo 92, Kendo 88 and Kenja 88
    several of the models has something called 3D radius sidecut, a combination of three different turningradiuses
    Mantra 102: 2035 g

  23. #198
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,184
    Quote Originally Posted by XavierD View Post
    Menace PROTO is the Factory Proto.

    Legend series remains, new graphics.
    Why the name change to Menace...?

    Sounds like it should be an early 2000 K2 ski

  24. #199
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    it's the "freestyle" line up. there is at least 1 more ski in the line, think it will be a updated Slicer but not 100%.

  25. #200
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    6,184
    If it's a slightly fatter version, that should be exciting.

    Figured Permin would get a skinnier ski made for his style of skiing.

    Hopefully we'll know more soon.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •