Check Out Our Shop
Page 7 of 27 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 663

Thread: Get Down with Down (skis)

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    78° 41′ 0″ N, 16° 24′ 0″ E
    Posts
    1,522
    Quote Originally Posted by JanIdar View Post
    This can´t be correct?
    You´re right, they were reversed. Fixed now.
    simen@downskis.com DOWN SKIS

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gaperville, CO
    Posts
    5,929
    Quote Originally Posted by SiSt View Post
    So, list of straight pull from tail to recommended mounting point:

    CD114 (all layup versions are the same):
    182: 830mm
    189: 862mm
    196: 894mm

    CD 104:
    181: 797mm
    187: 828mm

    LD 102:
    179: 773mm
    186: 803mm

    LD 90:
    177: 765mm

    SD 105:
    187: 824mm
    202: 890mm

    SD 95:
    184: 820mm

    TD 105:
    182: 889mm
    172: 854mm

    TD 89:
    181: 911mm (center mount, it´s symmetrical)

    This is useful for me too, as I can reference this when doing next years´ graphics... :-D
    This is relevant....to our interests....https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...56#post5490356

    Thanks. For both the skis and the detailed mount points.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Indeed! Thanks for the mount point beta.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Bodenseekreis
    Posts
    1,067
    Be cautious when installing the tourers. I encountered two spinners on one Radical heel, and I hadn't even started to build up torque for the final twist before the threads let go on my 104L's. There were also very little effort needed to drill them, like drilling cold butter, pay attention!
    Toes tighted up properly without problems though.

    I did not tap the holes as I never do, maybe that was what pushed me over the edge. No worries on my behalf though as both heels will get inserts for all screws as a precautionary measure.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    northeast
    Posts
    5,968
    Quote Originally Posted by SiSt View Post
    So, list of straight pull from tail to recommended mounting point:

    CD114 (all layup versions are the same):
    182: 830mm
    189: 862mm
    196: 894mm

    CD 104:
    181: 797mm
    187: 828mm

    LD 102:
    179: 773mm
    186: 803mm

    LD 90:
    177: 765mm

    SD 105:
    187: 824mm
    202: 890mm

    SD 95:
    184: 820mm

    TD 105:
    182: 889mm
    172: 854mm

    TD 89:
    181: 911mm (center mount, it´s symmetrical)

    This is useful for me too, as I can reference this when doing next years´ graphics... :-D
    thank you for this!

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by SoooL View Post
    Be cautious when installing the tourers. I encountered two spinners on one Radical heel, and I hadn't even started to build up torque for the final twist before the threads let go on my 104L's. There were also very little effort needed to drill them, like drilling cold butter, pay attention!
    Toes tighted up properly without problems though.

    I did not tap the holes as I never do, maybe that was what pushed me over the edge. No worries on my behalf though as both heels will get inserts for all screws as a precautionary measure.
    That's super weird. I don't recall that being the issue on either pair of the Down skis I've mounted (edit: both were "touring" models).
    Last edited by auvgeek; 11-07-2018 at 05:45 PM.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Bodenseekreis
    Posts
    1,067
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    That's super weird. I don't recall that being the issue on either pair of the Down skis I've mounted.
    New experience for me too, and these are my fifth pair of Downs.

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Same here, but it never hurts to pay attention ;-)

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    78° 41′ 0″ N, 16° 24′ 0″ E
    Posts
    1,522
    Occasionally happens in skis with the light cores (spinners). There is a mounting reinforcement layer covering any binding/bsl known, so we have very few pullouts happening.

    Good to hear you're getting them fixed with inserts. As always, let us know if there are problems, we try to go above and beyond to rectify things.

    Sent from my SM-G950F using TGR Forums mobile app
    simen@downskis.com DOWN SKIS

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Bodenseekreis
    Posts
    1,067
    Quote Originally Posted by SiSt View Post
    Occasionally happens in skis with the light cores (spinners). There is a mounting reinforcement layer covering any binding/bsl known, so we have very few pullouts happening.

    Good to hear you're getting them fixed with inserts. As always, let us know if there are problems, we try to go above and beyond to rectify things.

    Sent from my SM-G950F using TGR Forums mobile app
    That's good to know, thanks Simen!

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    I'm getting ready to box (for re-shipping) a few of the skis that shipped to Colorado, and I want to emphasize to go with Simen's numbers.

    I checked a few pairs. On one pair, the silk-screened line is 1.5cm forward of recommended center. On a couple of other pairs the silk-screened center line straddles the recommended line by about 1cm - one ahead of and one behind the line. I didn't measure every pair - even I'm not that OCD.

    Simen's idea moving forward is brilliant. It should be industry standard. It may take us a while to get there, but we get there [emoji3]

    Thanks again for wrestling this issue into submission, Simen!

    ... Thom
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 11-07-2018 at 10:47 PM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    801
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    I was temped by the 187cm 105s ... sanity prevailed.
    I should have my 202s in hand this week!
    I'm 6'7"ish and 250lbs. Finding a charging ski I don't feel like is a park ski under me is challenging. That being said I'm slightly terrified of these already. Also ordered the 196 cd114!

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,899
    I'm glad this topic was raised. The line on my 95s is forward of the -10 target mark ... closer to -8.

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    801
    West coast shipment is here! Holy hell these 202s are monsters!!

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  15. #165
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    875
    Quote Originally Posted by pyromaniacman129 View Post
    West coast shipment is here! Holy hell these 202s are monsters!!

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
    Jesus those 202s make the CD104s look like 168s.

  16. #166
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,180

    Get Down with Down (skis)

    The td 105 looks like a center mounted Kartel. Generous, rounded rocker lines, thick-ish core. Will post photos once I mount - stoked to try them.

    Slightly off topic question. These are replacing the only ski I have left without substantial rocker. Anyone here ever worry about keeping a traditional old school ski in the quiver if only to keep your form and technique honest? Or is that a stupid thing to worry about? Maybe a more appropriate question for dgamms old man park skiing thread
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  17. #167
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    CO
    Posts
    875
    Quote Originally Posted by SupreChicken View Post
    The td 105 looks like a center mounted Kartel. Generous, rounded rocker lines, thick-ish core. Will post photos once I mount - stoked to try them.

    Slightly off topic question. These are replacing the only ski I have left without substantial rocker. Anyone here ever worry about keeping a traditional old school ski in the quiver if only to keep your form and technique honest? Or is that a stupid thing to worry about? Maybe a more appropriate question for dgamms old man park skiing thread
    Nothing wrong with that. I got the other pair of TD105s but will ski some traditional shapes early season to get the legs ready for deep snow. I like crud cutting stiff planks when the snow isn't fresh, especially in Colorado.

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by SupreChicken View Post
    Slightly off topic question. These are replacing the only ski I have left without substantial rocker. Anyone here ever worry about keeping a traditional old school ski in the quiver if only to keep your form and technique honest? Or is that a stupid thing to worry about? Maybe a more appropriate question for dgamms old man park skiing thread
    I have a pair of second year Coombas that come out a couple of half days each year. They remind me I'm not as good as I think I am ;-)

    They also remind me that not all 181s are short.

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Tahoe>Missoula>Fort Collins
    Posts
    1,799
    I enjoy it. Ski a Rossi sickle still.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums


  20. #170
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,899
    Quote Originally Posted by SupreChicken View Post
    The td 105 looks like a center mounted Kartel. Generous, rounded rocker lines, thick-ish core. Will post photos once I mount - stoked to try them.

    Slightly off topic question. These are replacing the only ski I have left without substantial rocker. Anyone here ever worry about keeping a traditional old school ski in the quiver if only to keep your form and technique honest? Or is that a stupid thing to worry about? Maybe a more appropriate question for dgamms old man park skiing thread
    I've always had a cambered, early rise tip ski. Def a place and lots of fun on those not-so-fresh days.

  21. #171
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    15
    SD105 2017/2018 vs SD105 2018/2019 :


    2018/2019 have more camber and weight a little more : ~4900g vs ~4800g

  22. #172
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    holy... Those skis look like they wanna haul!

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,899
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubulefou View Post
    SD105 2017/2018 vs SD105 2018/2019 :


    2018/2019 have more camber and weight a little more : ~4900g vs ~4800g
    Sick.
    Double check the line measurement against the info SiSt posted in this thread. Mine was forward a bit.
    When I saw the amount of camber on the 95s I was concerned at first. Having been out on them I can say it feels/works great.

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    801
    Quote Originally Posted by N1CK. View Post
    Sick.
    Double check the line measurement against the info SiSt posted in this thread. Mine was forward a bit.
    When I saw the amount of camber on the 95s I was concerned at first. Having been out on them I can say it feels/works great.
    Can't wait to get on my 202s. Feel like they're going to want to go fast and straight for some reason....

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  25. #175
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    http://galibierdesign.com/images/other_forums/Down_CD-114-01.jpg[/IMG]
    Last edited by galibier_numero_un; 11-16-2018 at 09:29 PM.
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •