Check Out Our Shop
Page 13 of 112 FirstFirst ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 2799

Thread: What's Blizzard up to?

  1. #301
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay P View Post
    goddamn.
    X2... That ski is Fing sexy...!

  2. #302
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    10
    I know you guys probably aren't going to be too excited about the Brahma, but how do you think the changes will effect how it skis? Sounds to me like it is going to prefer to be more of a carving style of ski with a larger turning radius. How much impact do you think that will have on it's ability to get in trees and moguls?

  3. #303
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,443

    What's Blizzard up to?

    Deleted due to more info
    Last edited by skibrd; 01-19-2017 at 02:43 AM.

  4. #304
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    942
    The Brahma and Bonafide still have metal in the tip and tail. They have the same basic construction as the 15/16 products with different sidecut and rocker profiles. They have less rocker lengthwise but the tips aren't as low profile. They also have 1.5-2m more sidecut. Basically you don't have to lay them over as far to get them to engage. Still a longer radius than most but easier to turn at slower speeds and they pull harder through the turn.

    Not sure why everyone thinks that cause there's Carbon in the tip and tail on the Brahma, Bonafide, Cochise there is no metal. The carbon is in addition to the metal.

  5. #305
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    3,443
    Quote Originally Posted by wasatchback View Post
    The Brahma and Bonafide still have metal in the tip and tail. They have the same basic construction as the 15/16 products with different sidecut and rocker profiles. They have less rocker lengthwise but the tips aren't as low profile. They also have 1.5-2m more sidecut. Basically you don't have to lay them over as far to get them to engage. Still a longer radius than most but easier to turn at slower speeds and they pull harder through the turn.

    Not sure why everyone thinks that cause there's Carbon in the tip and tail on the Brahma, Bonafide, Cochise there is no metal. The carbon is in addition to the metal.
    I think I'm confused because I was under the impression that the Rustler 10/11 has a partial metal core, and that was in the new Brahma, and Bonafide. The Cochise isn't changing from the current model, correct?

  6. #306
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    942
    Rustlers and Spur have a partial metal construction (I'll post pics tomorrow). Brahma, Bonafide are still 2.5 sheets of metal.

  7. #307
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Reno
    Posts
    507
    Sounds like the Bonafide and Brahma are getting more front side bias. What I currently like about these skis is how they ski off piste. They both strike a nice balance of predictability and maneuverability is crud conditions, while maintaining decent hard snow grip, and energetic carvers. Jack of all trades, master of none.

  8. #308
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by Nevada29er View Post
    Sounds like the Bonafide and Brahma are getting more front side bias. What I currently like about these skis is how they ski off piste. They both strike a nice balance of predictability and maneuverability is crud conditions, while maintaining decent hard snow grip, and energetic carvers. Jack of all trades, master of none.
    Not sure how interested in them I am anymore, I was looking for a second ski for when conditions are a bit rougher at to take onto the backside of Lake Louise. If they are going to be sacrificing a lot of their backside ability I may end up looking to something else to fill the role. I'll have to see what happens when I demo though.

    I'm only averaging 30 days a season so I feel like any durability issues that would arise from having less metal in it wouldn't really be an issue for me, although from what wasatchback is saying it shouldn't be an issue.

  9. #309
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Banff, AB
    Posts
    499
    Quote Originally Posted by AntiVortex View Post
    Not sure how interested in them I am anymore, I was looking for a second ski for when conditions are a bit rougher at to take onto the backside of Lake Louise. If they are going to be sacrificing a lot of their backside ability I may end up looking to something else to fill the role. I'll have to see what happens when I demo though.
    Demo at LL on 11th Feb so come try them out.

  10. #310
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    942
    Got a little more beta on the Spurs... engineers were in Alta this week and gotta talk to them for a bit...

    Inside edge Radius 30m
    Outside edge Radius 26m

    Different taper rates and obviously different lengths to each edge

    Weight of one of my samples
    2222g... pretty decent for a 192 124mm waisted ski.

  11. #311
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    336

    Rustlers

    Quote Originally Posted by wasatchback View Post
    Got a little more beta on the Spurs... engineers were in Alta this week and gotta talk to them for a bit...

    Inside edge Radius 30m
    Outside edge Radius 26m

    Different taper rates and obviously different lengths to each edge

    Weight of one of my samples
    2222g... pretty decent for a 192 124mm waisted ski.
    Any_weights_on_the_Rustlers?

  12. #312
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,757
    What is the Zero G lineup going to look like? Mention earlier of the mid-teens model, do 95 and 108 stay the same?

  13. #313
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Thomas View Post
    What is the Zero G lineup going to look like? Mention earlier of the mid-teens model, do 95 and 108 stay the same?
    Looks like they stay the same

  14. #314
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    512

    What's Blizzard up to?

    So Bodacious is going back to the bad ass metal original like in the yellow top sheet version? No carbon tip and tail? Lengths will be 196 and 186 again?
    Just askin. The yellow Bods are such frickin rippers. I still have the 186 in my quiver but they are rather on the shorter edge and I'd be really diggin something around 190 cm.
    Last edited by roQer; 01-22-2017 at 05:29 AM.

  15. #315
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    942
    Quote Originally Posted by roQer View Post
    So Bodacious is going back to the bad ass metal original like in the yellow top sheet version? No carbon tip and tail? Lengths will be 196 and 186 again?
    Just askin. The yellow Bods are such frickin rippers. I still have the 186 in my quiver but they are rather on the shorter edge and I'd be really diggin something around 190 cm.
    You got it. Original construction, shape, sizes, etc. Gonna be a one shot kinda deal I believe.
    Can't remember but I think a total of 150 split between two sizes. Plan is for the proceeds to be donated to Arne's Foundation and Flyin Ryan Hawks Foundation.

  16. #316
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    ut
    Posts
    942
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Thomas View Post
    What is the Zero G lineup going to look like? Mention earlier of the mid-teens model, do 95 and 108 stay the same?
    Zero G is unchanged for next season. Same graphics, same models.

    No new ski in the mid teens but new Rustler 11 weighs around 1850 in size 180 (112 waste). 178 ZG 108 weighs around 1650 for reference.

  17. #317
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Where the climate suits my clothes.
    Posts
    5,603
    #appstillcantdeleteposts
    #bringbackthetagz

  18. #318
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    11

    Old School Cochise??

    Quote Originally Posted by wasatchback View Post
    You got it. Original construction, shape, sizes, etc. Gonna be a one shot kinda deal I believe.
    Can't remember but I think a total of 150 split between two sizes. Plan is for the proceeds to be donated to Arne's Foundation and Flyin Ryan Hawks Foundation.
    Any chance of an old school cochise coming back?
    Those would sell like hotcakes....again.

  19. #319
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Lamebird
    Posts
    430
    Let's get more rippers on the old school bodacious how about it. There a hell of a lot of ski, in the best of ways.

  20. #320
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Land of the Woodchuck
    Posts
    63
    I got a chance to spend some time on the new Bonafide, and it doesn't sacrifice anything.. still a crud-buster, still can lay trenches. Minor improvements on an old classic. The new changes shouldn't deter anyone from buying one, it's not like they made it a 98mm-waisted "carving" ski, those are stupid.

  21. #321
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    540
    Skied the rustler 10 and 11 today. The 11 is sweet, good successor to the gunsmoke but the 10 unreal. One of the best skis I have ever been on. Rails turns like a fucking Kastle and plowes through bumps and crud like my gunsmokes. sick sick sick ski

  22. #322
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay P View Post
    Skied the rustler 10 and 11 today. The 11 is sweet, good successor to the gunsmoke but the 10 unreal. One of the best skis I have ever been on. Rails turns like a fucking Kastle and plowes through bumps and crud like my gunsmokes. sick sick sick ski
    This is not what I wanted to hear Jay P... I love my 193 Gunsmokes and have been hearing stellar things about the Rustler series... My buddy got to demo the 10 and his feedback was identical to yours... Do you know if the waist is 102 for the 188...?

  23. #323
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Truckee
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by Undertow View Post
    This is not what I wanted to hear Jay P... I love my 193 Gunsmokes and have been hearing stellar things about the Rustler series... My buddy got to demo the 10 and his feedback was identical to yours... Do you know if the waist is 102 for the 188...?
    104

  24. #324
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    336
    Nice. Super excited about these skis. My only concern is that blizzard made them too light. I heard the 11 in 180cm only weighs 1850g? Seems more like a touring weight class. For the majority of resort conditions, weight is your friend for smoothing out bad snow. Im worried at these weights (assuming I have them correct?), the Rustlers will be easily deflected in anything less than light fluffy. Thoughts?

  25. #325
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay P View Post
    104
    Thanks Jay... I am def going to have to give the Rustler 10 a go...!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •