We might have ~40" of depth, but we got 10" of liquid in there. That's a lot of mass, which times 'a' means of lot F!
Under such conditions, it is plausible to expect that the D scale (which measures destructiveness in mass) for a given slide might push historic boundaries while the R scale (volume-based) may not. Of course if the runout conditions are favorable for a long path length slide (as Davenport demonstrates with the low elevation ice layer?), the R value could get cranked up as well.
A nice write up on this here:
http://www.avalanche.org/moonstone/F...ne.TAR29.3.pdf
So considering how much rain we got over the past week - and if that didn't make it through that thick slab down to the bottom PWL - are we pretty much stuck with this layer until it just rips all of the 30+ degree faces clean over time as more weight is added? Or is there still a realistic chance for it to consolidate? If not, you'd expect the resort patrols to just bomb it all clean and start fresh... unless they're just waiting for it to go naturally and save them the trouble and explosives.
There's other ways for it to fix itself. New rain higher than the last rain. New snow buries the trigger points, etc.
powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.
^ Should see rounding setup if we get more snow, right? Unless it gets unusually cold, a good meter of consolidated snowpack should be enough to keep that temp gradient below 10*C/m, and we're not too far from that.
Has anyone been out to know how skiable Echo Lake is lately?
Could you explain a bit on the trigger points getting buried? I thought this was a faucet layer sitting right above the dirt in most of the northern facing bowls above 8k that had snow remaining from the storms in october? These slabs will break simply by load I assume?
Well I believe the issue is that this layer sits directly above the dirt, so the embodied energy of the ground itself is keeping it warmer.
No expert here or actual avy education here, but just food for thought....
Hm this new snow on crust is going to be great...
From the SAC public observations "A piece of the crust sawed out of the snowpack at around 8600 ft on an E aspect."
![]()
I think PD means that it's harder to realistically penetrate down to trigger points if the weak layer gets buried deeper into the pack. But that alone doesn't make the underlying structure any safer, it just means that more force is needed to load it to failure.
Only time and weather will indicate if and when north faces can come back into play. Lots of SWE will test it ... whether to failure or eventual rounding. Anyways, it's snowing again, plenty of good south facing terrain to ski, assuming the new stuff sticks to the crust![]()
_______________________________________________
"Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.
I'll be there." ... Andy Campbell
From what I've read, the more snow (especially warm storms in maritime climates) the better for healing depth hoar (facets). Mostly to reduce temperature gradient and the thicker snow pack make it much harder to trigger.
"More than most other weak layers, the strength of depth hoar varies quite dramatically from one location to another, depending mostly on the depth of the snowpack. Remember: thin snowpack means a weak snowpack. Thicker snowpacks insulate the cold air from the warm ground, have a small temperature gradient and thus a stronger snowpack."
I have a feeling this layer won't even be talked out on SAC in a week or so.
I got out Sunday for the first time but avoided due north terrain specifically for this reason. The E and E/NE faces were skiing great. There's plenty of safe skiing to be had. Just stay off steeper/rockier N facing shit for a bit (or dig to the bottom first) to let the snow do it's thing.
I'm bored. Watching in rain..........
Some footage from last year.......BC, West Shore, Mammoth Area and North Lake.
https://vimeo.com/192407030
Wow - doesn't even look icy below the N facing slopes. Thanks for the pic.
powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.
As per further up, yeah, I wasn't sure about that layer with more snow and cold with the proximity to the ground and whether that would make any difference.
I hope it doesn't last - and I've read Tremper and Snow Sense (a few years back and need to revisit) - but may have chosen a good year to finally get my AIARE 1 next month with Alpenglow. Jan 13-15 if anyone else here is doing the same, as some were saying several weeks back.
Regardless, never a bad thing to discuss this stuff publicly.
I remember several Tahoe seasons in the last 20 years during which we had problematic layer in the early season that disappeared (from the avalanche equation) when rain soaked the whole snow pack. Skiing sucked during the rain event and you had to be cautious for the next several days but after that the snowpack was completely different from before the rain event. I am hoping that happens again.
Latest forecast by nws for the reno area does not mention snow levels even once. It does sayTo me, this means it will be an all rain event below 9k again. I hope I'm wrong.The most notable change in the evolution of this major
weather event is that the arrival of the cold air push appears to
be delayed a few hours, with the bulk of the cold air coming after
4 AM early Friday morning across the I-80 and US-50 corridors.
edit- the sacramento office has a better forecast
Snow levels will initially start above 7000 feet today, but fall
rapidly as the front passes through. By early Friday, snow levels
could drop down to 2000-4000 feet, but heavier precipitation will
be winding down. There is still some uncertainty with how snow
accumulation the mid-slopes of the northern Sierra will get, but
the pass levels will see at least a foot and likely more.
Last edited by powdork; 12-14-2016 at 10:10 AM.
powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.
can't say i've seen a seven foot wave on tahoe. who's surfing today?LAKE TAHOE: DANGEROUS LIFE THREATENING BOATING CONDITIONS ARE EXPECTED WITH WAVE HEIGHTS 3 TO 7 FEET.
powdork.com - new and improved, with 20% more dork.
Bookmarks