Check Out Our Shop
Page 41 of 296 FirstFirst ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... LastLast
Results 1,001 to 1,025 of 7388

Thread: PSA: Mount your own fucking skis.

  1. #1001
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by LC View Post
    If you don't know what cord centre is then why do you want to reference it? They're you're own fucking skis, mount them wherever you want.
    Because I have a setup mounted that way and I like it.

  2. #1002
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    Ok, so sounds like this method is way dated. And CORD center is what I should be saying. Mounting old Salomon Foil for rock skis, also Dynastar Cham 2.0 107. The shop I trust mounts between cord and boot center, and I like where that is on other skis in the quiver so trying to replicate (and avoid spending $40 x 2). The Foils were previously mounted more centered on the ski, which I didn't like. Can't say I ride switch much on tele. Thanks for the history lesson, much appreciated. Definitely an art to all this.
    Actually dude, you are correct, it is CHORD center!
    I still start a mount with measuring chord and determine how far back I want my boot center depending on what kind of ski is being mounted. I kinda like a more centered mount personally and find a lot of manufacturers put the line too far back.

    Measure your boot sole from pin line to heel. You're boot center is in the middle of these points. Mark a line on your boot. Measure out the skis(chord on the shop mounted skis) and put your boot into binding and see where the boot center mark lines up. Mount your new skis off these figures

  3. #1003
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,140
    I don't know. While I've seen chord center for years, including in BD mounting specs., It's longstanding misuse doesn't make it right. End of the day, we know what one means.

  4. #1004
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    On another tangent.
    Posts
    4,028

    PSA: Mount your own fucking skis.

    So basically you find a cord's center to find chord center.

    (chord 2 |kôrd|
    noun
    1 Mathematics a straight line joining the ends of an arc.)
    Last edited by Alpinord; 04-07-2016 at 11:10 PM.
    Best regards, Terry
    (Direct Contact is best vs PMs)

    SlideWright.com
    Ski, Snowboard & Tools, Wax and Wares
    Repair, Waxing, Tuning, Mounting Tips & more
    Add TGR handle to notes & paste 5% TGR Discount code during checkout: 1121TGR

  5. #1005
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,140
    OK, I'll man up. Dictionary wins. What next, split infinitives?

  6. #1006
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    The shop I trust mounts between cord and boot center
    Not sure what shop this is, but you realize that chord center is on your ski (straight pull from tip to tail divided by 2) and boot center is on your boot, right? (Almost always marked on your boot with the letter "A"). If there is a decal on your ski that says "boot center" it doesn't refer to a spot you can divine with a tape measure on a given ski using a prescribed formula, it's chosen by the ski company as a recommendation for best overall performance (most companies now say "factory recommended" on the ski, often augmented with + and - marks or mount positions favored by company pro riders.

    As dschane mentions, the advent of rocker has pretty much made chord center obsolete for mounting purposes . . .

  7. #1007
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    16,763
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    As dschane mentions, the advent of rocker has pretty much made chord center obsolete for mounting purposes . . .
    How about BoF/CRS, is that still pretty valid, at least as a starting point?

  8. #1008
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by Meadow Skipper View Post
    How about BoF/CRS, is that still pretty valid, at least as a starting point?
    I think so, though with a lot of rocker at both ends and little to no camber, it becomes increasingly difficult to locate the contact points accurately.

  9. #1009
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Not sure what shop this is, but you realize that chord center is on your ski (straight pull from tip to tail divided by 2) and boot center is on your boot, right? (Almost always marked on your boot with the letter "A"). If there is a decal on your ski that says "boot center" it doesn't refer to a spot you can divine with a tape measure on a given ski using a prescribed formula, it's chosen by the ski company as a recommendation for best overall performance (most companies now say "factory recommended" on the ski, often augmented with + and - marks or mount positions favored by company pro riders.

    As dschane mentions, the advent of rocker has pretty much made chord center obsolete for mounting purposes . . .
    By boot center I meant recommended manufacturer center mark on the ski. Tele boots typically don't have boot center marked but it is easy to calculate. Just then a matter of where to put the boot. : )

    This particular shop marks chord center (tip to tail for flat tailed ski divided by 2, or tip to end of running surface for tail rocker/twintip ski divided by 2) then compares to manufacturer mark and splits the difference.

    Shop is Neptune Mountaineering in Boulder. Those guys know their stuff and I trust their recommendations always, on ski mounting or most else skiing and climbing related.

  10. #1010
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,831
    My tele boots have a boot center mark. Most newer ones do.
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  11. #1011
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    By boot center I meant recommended manufacturer center mark on the ski.
    Got it. Probably best to refer to this as "factory recommended" or whatever it actually says on the ski for the sake of accuracy. Didn't mean to disparage Neptune, I've heard very good things about them, but like I said chord center was more relevant when all skis pretty much had full camber and very similar tip profiles/flat tails.

  12. #1012
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,397
    Quote Originally Posted by ~mikey b View Post
    My tele boots have a boot center mark. Most newer ones do.
    I have 2014 T-Race - I don't think they have a center mark.

  13. #1013
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Posts
    16,763
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    I think so, though with a lot of rocker at both ends and little to no camber, it becomes increasingly difficult to locate the contact points accurately.
    I guess with a fully rockered ski you'd have to go with the mfr's marks, at least after measuring to make sure those're both in the same location.

    For tele boots, measure from the pin holes to the end of the heel and divide by 2. Did someone already say that?

  14. #1014
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,140
    Those T Races probably have the mark. Look for a line with an A near it on one of the sides of the sole. Otherwise, do as ^^^ he suggests and measure the sole of the boot boot, subtract 14 mm for duck bill, and divide by 2. If you're using a paper template, you can add your boot center line by measuring from the pin line on the template and drawing your BC line on the template. Then just line that up with the ski's recommended mark (or where ever you plan to put boot center).

  15. #1015
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,831

    PSA: Mount your own fucking skis.

    Yes do that.

    Except they might not have pin holes so estimate. It's not fucking rocket surgery.
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  16. #1016
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,397
    Not rocket surgery. The boot part is easy.

    Last question for the experts: I'm mounting the same binding (22D Vice) on two pair of skis (Squad 7s and Cham 2.0 107s). Any reason why I wouldn't use Binding Freedom inserts on both and only one pair of bindings?

  17. #1017
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    but like I said chord center was more relevant when all skis pretty much had full camber and very similar tip profiles/flat tails.
    Absolutely do not agree with this and start every mount with a chord measurement no matter the ski shape or rocker profile(this will also give you a reference as to where 'factory recommended' is). I just adjust how far rearward I put the center line depending on the shape/rocker profiles. If you take a TRO ski and measure the part only touching when decambered and mounting in the middle of that, that's a pretty rearward mount and it completely ignores any sort of 3D snow engagement.

    wpk- just call fucking Neptune and ask them. If this method works for you, I'd stick with it!

  18. #1018
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,831
    Quote Originally Posted by ski-wpk View Post
    Not rocket surgery. The boot part is easy.

    Last question for the experts: I'm mounting the same binding (22D Vice) on two pair of skis (Squad 7s and Cham 2.0 107s). Any reason why I wouldn't use Binding Freedom inserts on both and only one pair of bindings?
    I found it to be a bit of a pain in the ass swapping bindings back and forth depending on the day's conditions. I work on skis and don't like having to haul them back and forth to do them in the evening and I don't always have time in the morning, so I ended up with a couple pair of bindings for my two main skis. I have 5 with Axl inserts and 2 sets of clamps.
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  19. #1019
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,397

    PSA: Mount your own fucking skis.

    Thanks mikey b. I only have two pair of skis needing bindings. Seems 2 pair of bindings are the minimum. Sharing 1 pair between my two mostly frequently used skis seems annoying.
    Last edited by ski-wpk; 04-12-2016 at 10:31 PM.

  20. #1020
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Juneau
    Posts
    1,140
    You might just buy a second set of heels and swap the frame.

    Edit: though Vice heels dont have climbing wires so they may be very simple to swap, unlike 22D's other heels. Not rocket dissection either, but more fiddly than avg.
    Last edited by dschane; 04-11-2016 at 09:38 AM.

  21. #1021
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    18,831
    I tried that too but broke down and bought another set. Way easier for me.
    I didn't believe in reincarnation when I was your age either.

  22. #1022
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Imaginationland
    Posts
    4,846
    Mounted Atomic Trackers on 167cm Salomon Q88's last night for the lady. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1465055513031.jpg 
Views:	277 
Size:	83.9 KB 
ID:	183339 Had to make a template myself again because I couldn't get the template in the other thread to print at correct scale. Regardless, everything went well and another solid mount resulted. She is stoked to have her very own skis now!

  23. #1023
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sandy by the front
    Posts
    2,385
    Two Moment Underworlds, two Vipec 12's, one Jigarex and two Polygamy Porter Nitro's and the job is done.

  24. #1024
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sandy by the front
    Posts
    2,385
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC00181.jpg 
Views:	361 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	184276Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC00181.jpg 
Views:	361 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	184276Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC00181.jpg 
Views:	361 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	184276

  25. #1025
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Imaginationland
    Posts
    4,846
    Quote Originally Posted by bigdude2468 View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC00181.jpg 
Views:	361 
Size:	1.31 MB 
ID:	184276
    Pretty sure this belongs in the lamest custom plates thread. Wisconsin? Really? You're trying too hard.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •