Check Out Our Shop
Page 23 of 71 FirstFirst ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... LastLast
Results 551 to 575 of 1757

Thread: 4FRNT Renegade ~ Hand built in SLC.

  1. #551
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by DudeLebowSKI View Post
    Haha. I am pretty sure you spewed more douche in your one post than he will in his lifetime. Better thicken up than skin young Skywalker.
    Sigh...I hardly understand how I did so. This is "welcome to TGR" I guess. I've heard all about it! Bottom line, still better than NS.

  2. #552
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247
    Quote Originally Posted by supercharge View Post
    Sigh...I hardly understand how I did so. This is "welcome to TGR" I guess. I've heard all about it! Bottom line, still better than NS.
    Eh... You got off pretty light.

    At your size I'd say you def don't need 196. But I'm approx your weight and after skiing the 186 for 2 seasons I wouldn't mind having the 196 in a quiver.
    focus.

  3. #553
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    8
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    Eh... You got off pretty light.

    At your size I'd say you def don't need 196. But I'm approx your weight and after skiing the 186 for 2 seasons I wouldn't mind having the 196 in a quiver.
    Yea I guess it's just the internet after all! Haha.

    Anyways, I got the 186! I demo'd some first in the choppiest snow ever. I deliberately scouted for the worst snow I could find, and pushed as hard and fast as I could. I tried ripping all different pitches and making lots of turns as well as straight-lining just for kicks and giggles. Woo wooooo...freight trains coming through. I never get a brake-slam feeling from either or both of the skis at once...they just truck. I'm blown away. These are not toys, they're weapons. I found that any time I got lazy and stopped pressing my shins hard forward, I would nearly get my ass kicked from the reverse camber. Keeps me aggressive and in the moment! Unlike floppy pow skis, these get seemingly MORE stable the faster they go. I couldn't find a speed limit where I would normally begin to feel sketchy, now i can charge to the max with the utmost confidence. They are a gnarly breed for sure and intense to ski. You barely have to think about the snow underneath, just go. Good job on the design!!

  4. #554
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kraut Country
    Posts
    145
    Renegade 196 is the fastest pow Ski i ever skied. I used mine during my AK trip and was shit scared...Went there with a torn MCL so I cant really give a good review but you really need to have some good leg power to ride those Beasts properly.

    I hope I can have more fun with them next year..

  5. #555
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    365
    Please tell Misti thanks for helping me today! Awesome customer service.

  6. #556
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT USA
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by JJChit View Post
    Please tell Misti thanks for helping me today! Awesome customer service.
    Glad she could help you out! I'll let her know. Misti is one of our unsung heroes around here.
    Rider driven since '02.

  7. #557
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    --->
    Posts
    481
    I am drooling over mine waiting another 3 months until I head down to South America for a month.
    Quote Originally Posted by adria33 View Post
    I ride alone so I don't get held back by dead weights and dead beats. It's not always like that, but I destroy most skiers on the pistes.

  8. #558
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,271
    Quote Originally Posted by |K_M| View Post
    Finally got my 196s in working order, currently with plums but mounted with inserts @ sports creel in spokane (thank you so much micah. so so much, you put a ton of work into these and it shows. THANKS!). fucking beautiful skis.



    How are your rens working w/ the tech binders? Any complaints/issues.

  9. #559
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3
    I have the same problem with the tune that some of you guys have had, how did it work out for you? Did a new tune according to 4frnts specs fix the problem?

  10. #560
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mostly in a bad dream
    Posts
    562
    Quote Originally Posted by himmelsdyk View Post
    I have the same problem with the tune that some of you guys have had, how did it work out for you? Did a new tune according to 4frnts specs fix the problem?
    New tune with lighter base structure and 1 degree base bevel = fixed. The new tune was done on a Montana as opposed to the hand tune using grinders I had done at the 'other' shop.
    First 360 mute grab --> Andrew Sheppard --> Snowdrifters 1996

  11. #561
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by DudeLebowSKI View Post
    New tune with lighter base structure and 1 degree base bevel = fixed. The new tune was done on a Montana as opposed to the hand tune using grinders I had done at the 'other' shop.
    Ok that sounds very good and thank you for the super fast answer

  12. #562
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Quote Originally Posted by DudeLebowSKI View Post
    New tune with lighter base structure and 1 degree base bevel = fixed. The new tune was done on a Montana as opposed to the hand tune using grinders I had done at the 'other' shop.
    Just looking for a little clarification here, not sure what "hand tune using grinders" means
    Were your skis ground on a stone grinder at the 'other' shop?

  13. #563
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mostly in a bad dream
    Posts
    562
    Quote Originally Posted by tuco View Post
    Just looking for a little clarification here, not sure what "hand tune using grinders" means
    Were your skis ground on a stone grinder at the 'other' shop?
    The other shop doesn't have any machines IE. Montana, Wintersteiger, etc. I didn't know this when I took the skis in. They have all stationary hand guided tools. I'm not a shop rat so I dont know the names of everything but to me it looked like a highschool industrial ed shop with belt sanders, grinders and various other pieces of spinning hand guided tuning equipment. Very reputable shop though which is weird.
    First 360 mute grab --> Andrew Sheppard --> Snowdrifters 1996

  14. #564
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    123
    The weekend's spoils:


    After a few days of drooling I've got a question, how exact is the sidecut to rocker match? The rocker on my ren's is 5mm shy of matching the sidecut...is this normal? I do, however, have the normal 2.5" floor to ptex tip splay.

    Otherwise, stoked on these skis. Thinking 88 mount, with solly's. I will have to suffice with my GS's next week, but I will be dreaming about ripping lines like hoji...

    EDIT: has anyone used anything other than the factory style tune? I usually give soft snow skis a 1* base bevel, and 2* or 3* side bevel, any suggestions?

  15. #565
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    Quote Originally Posted by Tupp- View Post
    After a few days of drooling I've got a question, how exact is the sidecut to rocker match? The rocker on my ren's is 5mm shy of matching the sidecut...is this normal? I do, however, have the normal 2.5" floor to ptex tip splay.
    My skis are exactly the same as yours. One of the first things I did was check that to see, and the rocker isn't quite deep enough to match the sidecut exactly. They ski great though, and I never gave it another thought.

    has anyone used anything other than the factory style tune? I usually give soft snow skis a 1* base bevel, and 2* or 3* side bevel, any suggestions?
    You can see the discussion on the previous page, but people generally like the factory tune and dislike how they ski after a shop tunes them to the non-factory spec. I love how they ski now, and will definitely get them tuned with 4FRNTs suggestions (1*/1* with minimal base structure). I didn't like my Lhasa Fats at 1*/1*, they skied better at the factory 1*/2*, but I definitely don't want to change anything about how the Rens ski.
    Last edited by auvgeek; 10-23-2012 at 09:51 AM.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  16. #566
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Tupp- View Post
    The weekend's spoils:


    After a few days of drooling I've got a question, how exact is the sidecut to rocker match? The rocker on my ren's is 5mm shy of matching the sidecut...is this normal? I do, however, have the normal 2.5" floor to ptex tip splay.

    that is what I have on mine. Mine are supposed to be from this past year but I dont have the tip splay that some others seem to have.

    Not sure how the performance will be different.

    Anybody been on both variations of the rocker profile?

  17. #567
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Posts
    12,122
    Quote Originally Posted by Bird Blaster View Post
    that is what I have on mine. Mine are supposed to be from this past year but I dont have the tip splay that some others seem to have.

    Not sure how the performance will be different.

    Anybody been on both variations of the rocker profile?
    If you ski them both back to back in certain conditions you may notice it a little, but it won't change the way they ski significantly in the day-to-day. It was a change at the margins for sure.

    Also, after you ski them a few days, the splay will open up some as the camber relaxes a bit. At least they did with mine.

    This year we have done a bunch of tuning to the press (mostly math and science things I don't understand), and they are coming out even better than before.

  18. #568
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    5,630
    I'm just gonna toss this out there: anybody who regretted buying a pair of 196s should shoot me a PM. I'm sorta kinda looking for a pair, but prefer last year's graphics (and price tag).

    Okay, back to your regularly scheduled programming.
    "Alpine rock and steep, deep powder are what I seek, and I will always find solace there." - Bean Bowers

    photos

  19. #569
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    123
    Quote Originally Posted by auvgeek View Post
    You can see the discussion on the previous page, but people generally like the factory tune and dislike how they ski after the shop tunes them. I love how they ski now, and will definitely get them tuned with 4FRNTs suggestions (1*/1* with minimal base structure). I didn't like my Lhasa Fats at 1*/1*, they skied better at the factory 1*/2*, but I definitely don't want to change anything about how the Rens ski.
    I guess I will just let the shops tune these ones.. I've don't have a 1* side bevel... I will ask for little or no base structure.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bird Blaster View Post
    that is what I have on mine. Mine are supposed to be from this past year but I dont have the tip splay that some others seem to have.

    Not sure how the performance will be different.

    Anybody been on both variations of the rocker profile?
    These are supposed to be the 2012 version, they have the orange bases, like yours BB. Is 5" of tip splay not the norm? I was gunning for the newer tip height, it seemed like a good tweak. I'll be pretty bummed if these turn out to be the old shape. At least I've got the orange top-sheets, there is something off about the new owl graphics...

  20. #570
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    norcal
    Posts
    1,418
    I have both 11s and 12's. They both have the same splay, the 12 just has a bit more pronounced curve and the dampening strip a bit longer. Still think an additional half inch would be an improvement. And yeah, the original topsheets are a touch cooler.
    Life of a repo man is always intense.

  21. #571
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,271
    Quote Originally Posted by Tupp- View Post
    I guess I will just let the shops tune these ones.. I've don't have a 1* side bevel... I will ask for little or no base structure.



    These are supposed to be the 2012 version, they have the orange bases, like yours BB. Is 5" of tip splay not the norm? I was gunning for the newer tip height, it seemed like a good tweak. I'll be pretty bummed if these turn out to be the old shape. At least I've got the orange top-sheets, there is something off about the new owl graphics...
    I thought I had the "newer" rocker profile as well. Maybe it isn't a big difference between the two. My rocker doesn't seem to look like others in photos. (pretty imprecise I know).

    Regardless pretty stoked to get out on them this year. Wish I was going south. Maybe next year

  22. #572
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    123
    South America could be an option next summer... But thats for another thread.

    Can't wait to get on these. I'm now contemplating selling my FatBros, I love them but will they get any use with the renegades on board? Decisions, decisions...
    Last edited by Tupp-; 08-06-2012 at 04:32 PM.

  23. #573
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Kraut Country
    Posts
    145
    When will the Hojis hit the stores in Europe?

    New Year New Gear!

  24. #574
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Posts
    12,122
    Quote Originally Posted by ZekeWolf View Post
    When will the Hojis hit the stores in Europe?

    New Year New Gear!
    Our skis are on their way over from Europe right now, slated to be here in a couple of weeks. I think our European distributors will have them around the same time, and ship their shops once they have them. You can always find your distributor on our dealer page and contact them directly.

    Or shoot me a PM if you can't get ahold of them.

  25. #575
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Revelstoke, BC
    Posts
    1,333
    Quote Originally Posted by D(C) View Post
    Just a note about mounting point - it's HUGE. Here's my history with my 186 Renegades:

    2010/12 - Original mount: Dukes at 88
    2011/02 - Then mounted 916s at 87
    2011/03 - Switched back to Dukes at 88 because I found they lost responsiveness
    2011/08 - Then switched back to 916s at 87 because I had other plans for the Dukes
    2012/02 - Mounted Sollyfits at 88

    The ski feels DRASTICALLY different at 88 and 87 cm from the tail.

    88 - slarvy, likes long and short radius turns, very responsive and manageable, gets thrown a touch more on rough snow, more in the sweet spot on groomers

    87 - locked in aircraft carrier type feeling, much harder in tight spaces, feels more like a traditional charging ski, need to drive the tips or they wander

    I actually liked them in both mount positions depending what I intended to do. I prefer 88 because it feels more versatile, but those of you looking for a burly charger should mount at 87.

    Now my skis have 3 sets of holes, but I can use my beloved 916s and have the Rens under my feet when standing at the top of big lines in the backcountry. I'm stoked!
    Mounthing these soon along with some Hoji's and I'm not sure on the mount point. I'm think 88 for the FKS and 87 for Dynafits (going the quiver killer route on these). With the RX130 at a more upright stance I think I'll be more at home with 88. I enjoy the quick slarvey nature of this ski and would definitely be using this at the resort with this mount 100%. As for the Dynafit, the TLT5 is quite traditional in the forward lean department and a mount at 87 via Hoji's recommendations seems like a good idea.

    For the Hoji I'm think the same thing. Mount the FKS at factory and go back -1cm from the factory mount for the Dynafits.

    Any thoughts 4FRNT?
    If you can't dig it, you ain't got no shovel

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •