
Originally Posted by
saxon.jones
It's based on data from 1988 & 1993 and using a population from 2006 (6.0 billion, it'd be about 5.2 billion in 1990); and then they're only using a few data points (just estimations by the World Bank) and extrapolating a curve from them. Just to account for inflation you'd probably have to deflate your income by 50%. And if you have dependents you'd have to split your household income with them too.On top of that, plug in $1,000,000 and then run $250,000. You will get the same ranking. There's a definite lack of precision in their calculations.But I can see how a lot of people would see this and hear the message they're trying to give, which is probably all they care about.
Well, given a 1988 baseline, I sorta doubt there would be a whopping 50%inflation/deflation factor. That seems a little high, no?
"The reason death sticks so closely to life isn't biological necessity - it's envy. Life is so beautiful that death has fallen in love with it; a jealous, possesive love that grabs at what it can." by Yann Martel from Life of Pi
Posted by DJSapp:
"Squirrels are rats with good PR."
Bookmarks