Check Out Our Shop
Page 748 of 785 FirstFirst ... 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 ... LastLast
Results 18,676 to 18,700 of 19601

Thread: Is the stock market going to tank?

  1. #18676
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    14,420
    Quote Originally Posted by liv2ski View Post
    Interesting. Thanks for the vxx comment. Maybe easier than the Rydex Inverse fund I used back in 2007?
    I’m a terrible investor, but I know risk very well.

    Bonds have been getting hammered. That’s the big elephant in the room right now. Id hold out for a new low, and lock in 6-7%. I may do that with the big pimco bond fund. Or, take a shot like I am, and wait for a real sell off and buy that Schwab dividend fund.

    But it womt sell off as hard.

  2. #18677
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,270
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevo View Post
    IMHO you should be allocated based on your needs and not based on what Goldman says.

    Even if you did believe them, there is a 70% chance stocks don’t go down.

    People have been predicting major corrections since 2020.
    This. If you're trying to time the market, the chances of getting it correct are almost nil (just ask Naked Shorts). If you're doing it for risk-tolerance (or other) reasons, have at it.

  3. #18678
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Long DJT for inauguration pump. Short 47calls

  4. #18679
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,270
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    Long DJT for inauguration pump. Short 47calls
    Up over 21% today? lol

  5. #18680
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Up over 21% today? lol
    Quite the lemming effect from this morning

  6. #18681
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    20,178

    Is the stock market going to tank?

    I don’t think this means much as the wealthiest boomers have generational wealth now and no need to sell anything:

    “The share of equities held by people who are at or near retirement age fifty five + has climbed to about eighty percent up from sixty percent two decades ago, according to an analysis of Federal Reserve data by Rosenberg Research. And Americans seventy and older now have an "astonishing" thirty percent share.”

  7. #18682
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    gamehendge
    Posts
    1,340
    so we are all biding our time waiting for boomers to die so we can get their multiple massive houses and money.

  8. #18683
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by NBABUCKS1 View Post
    so we are all biding our time waiting for boomers to die so we can get their multiple massive houses and money.
    The assisted living industrial complex will do an excellent job of extracting money from upper middle class boomers.

  9. #18684
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    10,526
    Yep^

  10. #18685
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    Speaking as an entrepreneur in the senior living space, big YUP!!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  11. #18686
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,931
    Was recently reading somewhere about rich boomers dying & leaving a trust to take care of their pets, which has created in turn assisted living facilities for elderly pets at $6,000 / month.

    Allegedly.

  12. #18687
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    STL
    Posts
    14,420
    I sold more big cap tech, bought my jnj, pep, back. Added more VIX.

    I don’t even like buying the jnj, pep, but I’m 50% cash in qualified accts. They are long term keepers.

    At some point, we’re gonna need to hit the reset button.

    The only original gamble I have 100% left of from 2 yrs ago is square/block,p and Tesla, I doubled down at 180. Blocks bitcoins appreciated 10 billion, it’s my only crypto play left and i should dump,it, but i bought that fucker way too soon. Tesla I’m giving to my grand children.

    Perfectly happy making 5.25 in a mm, and if bonds see a new low, I’ll throw it into BOND long term.

  13. #18688
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    20,178
    I like BINC better than BOND for now. A lot less treasury with short duration and better yield. AAPL looks like another 10% lower. Not convinced that leads market lower though.

  14. #18689
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    20,996
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    Deflation helps the working class?

    Like during the Great Depression, or are we picturing some fantasy version of deflation that doesn’t come along with mass unemployment?
    As I remember when we had the last good asset reprice around 2007 thru 2013, there wasn't massive unemployment except amongst realtors and lenders.

    Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
    Never in U.S. history has the public chosen leadership this malevolent. The moral clarity of their decision is crystalline, particularly knowing how Trump will regard his slim margin as a “mandate” to do his worst. We’ve learned something about America that we didn’t know, or perhaps didn’t believe, and it’ll forever color our individual judgments of who and what we are.

  15. #18690
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,058
    Deepseek has NVDA down about 12% pre-market, other AI adjacent plays down 4-5%

  16. #18691
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,129
    liv2ski, unemployment went up to 9.9% during the Great Recession, from 4.4% prior to the recession. The biggest increase in unemployment since the Great Depression. This lead to poor wage growth for working class Americans post-Great Recession: https://www.clevelandfed.org/publica...reat-recession

  17. #18692
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,079
    hahaha holy shit. I have been holding VST since 2020/21 and just seen it explode in the last 18months. A couple months ago my wifes financial manager chided me about holding it once it had hit $160,and then dropped back to $140 as he thought is was way overplayed. I said "meh" let it run cause i feel like i am playing with house money at this point, but then I sold off about half my holding late last week at ~$192ish. Woke up this morning to an absolute freefall, and it being all the way back down at $140 (~25% drop overnight). So i just bought a bunch more, and put a sell limit for the same amount at 155 today. Im hoping for a deadcat bounce and an easy 1day profit, but worse case i still think its a good stock/company/utility long term and much more valuable than $140.


    What are folks thoughts on REITs in the near/medium term? Im looking for a somewhat safer play with a dividend for the next couple years and i already own a chunk of O, and a chunk of CTRE (a senior living facility REIT). Seems like rent is stabilizing, wage growth is catching up, and folks are going defaulting on loans,and trump/DOGE may be deregulating many of the markets that REITs operate in... so maybe REITs are a good play?

  18. #18693
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    your vacation
    Posts
    5,000
    Quote Originally Posted by liv2ski View Post
    As I remember when we had the last good asset reprice around 2007 thru 2013, there wasn't massive unemployment except amongst realtors and lenders.

    Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
    dude I sat around and barely worked for 2 years in construction
    unemployment was off the charts
    shit was dismal for many many people

    crazy how people forget how truely shitty it was
    the boomers were all clutching there purses looking at all the value and pretend money the stock market had made them as it was ripped away

    we need another 2007/2008 to really get people

  19. #18694
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyCarter View Post
    Deepseek has NVDA down about 12% pre-market, other AI adjacent plays down 4-5%
    Deepseek is allegedly way more efficient than closed source models like ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.

    It seems to me that makes the barrier to entry for companies needing AI tech lower (you no longer need as many GPUs for the same output), which should expand the market to the long tail and increase the size of the addressable market.

    NVDA may sell less GPUs per customer, but could sell more GPUs in total since the size of the addressable market increased.

  20. #18695
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,058

    Is the stock market going to tank?

    Market seems to be trying to figure out if it’s a CCP scam or a VC scam. I’d guess more a CCP scam, but people have been calling the VCs out a bit

  21. #18696
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by liv2ski View Post
    As I remember when we had the last good asset reprice around 2007 thru 2013, there wasn't massive unemployment except amongst realtors and lenders.

    Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
    That was a very difficult time to graduate college and start a career.

    I do think that deflation can be good for an economy though. There is a major bias against it because the only times that there has been significant asset deflation in recent history has coincided with severe economic downturns.

    "The Price of Time" (very thoroughly researched) and "The Price of Tomorrow" (more speculative) are books that both argue that deflation is healthy for the economy and that asset price deflation is good for the working class if it doesn't coincide with a severe downturn.

  22. #18697
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,129
    How does the book suggest deflation will come about without the severe downturn? Does it address the reason that the Fed and other central banks target positive inflation is to avoid the deflation, because deflation leads to people hoarding money (which is now going up in value without being invested) which leads to less spending, which leads to recession?

  23. #18698
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    20,996
    Ya, after I posted that comment, I thought you should of looked up the numbers, as I forget shit that doesn't matter to me very easily.
    I sure would welcome another market correction like that. RE values tanked 40% to 50% in San Diego.
    Shit, my youngest might be able to buy something if that happened.
    Never in U.S. history has the public chosen leadership this malevolent. The moral clarity of their decision is crystalline, particularly knowing how Trump will regard his slim margin as a “mandate” to do his worst. We’ve learned something about America that we didn’t know, or perhaps didn’t believe, and it’ll forever color our individual judgments of who and what we are.

  24. #18699
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    How does the book suggest deflation will come about without the severe downturn? Does it address the reason that the Fed and other central banks target positive inflation is to avoid the deflation, because deflation leads to people hoarding money (which is now going up in value without being invested) which leads to less spending, which leads to recession?
    Working class ownership of assets goes up as wages and asset prices become more aligned.

    Leveraged capital has to unwind, but the price elasticity of demand makes it so that labor gets to better participate in asset ownership at prices they can afford.

    The idea that "people hoard money because they expect that assets will deflate forever" isn't necessarily true. People are still economic actors, and price elasticity of demand is still a driving economic factor during times of deflation. Lower prices necessarily attract more demand, which balances out falling prices.

    "But labor won't have jobs in a deflationary environment"

    Not a truism throughout economic history.

    Perpetually backstopping asset owners (which policy makers have done for decades now) is a moral hazard that creates massive wealth disparities and gives asset owners significant leverage over labor. It also encourages more leverage, which leads to more risk in the long term.
    Last edited by Kevo; 01-27-2025 at 12:14 PM.

  25. #18700
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    At the beach
    Posts
    20,996
    Ya, after I posted that comment, I thought you should of looked up the numbers, as I forget shit that doesn't matter to me very easily.
    I sure would welcome another market correction like that. RE values tanked 40% to 50% in San Diego.
    Shit, my youngest might be able to buy something if that happened.
    Never in U.S. history has the public chosen leadership this malevolent. The moral clarity of their decision is crystalline, particularly knowing how Trump will regard his slim margin as a “mandate” to do his worst. We’ve learned something about America that we didn’t know, or perhaps didn’t believe, and it’ll forever color our individual judgments of who and what we are.

Similar Threads

  1. Who voted for Bush/Cheney in '00 or '04?
    By Bud Green in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 281
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 11:44 PM
  2. Risotto Recipes - What you got?
    By skiaholik in forum The Padded Room
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 06:03 PM
  3. Did American Ski Company get delisted from the stock market?
    By Free Range Lobster in forum General Ski / Snowboard Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-06-2005, 06:13 AM
  4. Bear Activists Killed and Eaten by Bears in Katmai
    By Lane Meyer in forum TGR Forum Archives
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 10-09-2003, 08:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •