Check Out Our Shop
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 89

Thread: People who sue ski areas should be shot.

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    The demographic and socio-political buttcrack.
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by TBS View Post
    That idea ended with The Pig War of 1859
    No that was where we got to keep the term "bacon" and they had to rename their product Canadian bacon.
    I think the Oregon Treaty of 1846 was the end of 54 40 or fight.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Way East Tennessee
    Posts
    4,634
    Quote Originally Posted by frozenwater View Post
    I sued a ski resort, and won.

    The year was roughly 2007-2008. The resort, SnowBasin, Utah. It had been snowing heavily for almost a week and the strawberry gondola had been shut down during the storm. I and a few friends timed it right and were on the lift drooling at the fresh tracks we were going to consume. As the lift neared the top a snowcat grooming the trail directly under the lift was approaching. I could see clearly that the increase in snow levels wasn't accounted for and the boom of the cat was going to hit the gondola I was in.

    I stood up and tried to run to the other side of this small gondola when it hit. That's all I remember.

    I woke up in a life flight helicopter on the way to the hospital, my world was nothing but pain. Eventually I was on the path to health when the medical bills starting coming in. I called Snowbasin assuming they would have no problem paying the tab for the life flight and hospital stay. Boy was I wrong - they denied it ever happened, they tried to tell me I faked the whole thing, they told patrollers nothign happened (as recounted to me by a good friend who was a patroller) They took the busted up gondola out of rotation and hid it.

    I was unemployed with 30k in medical bills. I called a lawyer. He wanted me to go for as much as I could, I held back his intentions and settled for enough to cover the bills. In hindsight I was dumb as to this day I still have pain from that incident - I should have sued them for every penny they had.

    Ski resorts are businesses, many are just evil empires, with a few exceptions. When they do wrong, Sue the hell out if them.
    You could have owned Snowbasin and you passed on the opportunity?
    In order to properly convert this thread to a polyasshat thread to more fully enrage the liberal left frequenting here...... (insert latest democratic blunder of your choice).

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,002
    Then again, it is pretty absurd what some ski areas do or think they can get away with. Many states have laws exempting them from all but the most negligent BS, and it seems they like to push that past its limit. Snowbowl does the bare minimum of maintenance and sometimes not even that. Customer service to them is like math to a dog. They make money because it's 20 minutes away and everyone else is 1.5hrs+ at highway speed. I can't believe the owner was a doctor. He couldn't have been a very good one.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Greater Drictor Wydaho
    Posts
    5,638
    What about a class action shareholders suit?

    Vail Corp stock price decline has attracted the attention of a very predatory law firm. Basically, the case is that Vail's core business model is unsustainable and they damn well knew it. Seems timely given the massive upswelling of hatred for monopoly skiing going on these days. Yeah, file that one in Park City. Slam dunk jury.

    What can I say? It couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch of people, I guess.
    Last edited by neckdeep; 01-16-2025 at 03:29 PM.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    8,086
    Quote Originally Posted by neckdeep View Post
    What about a class action shareholders suit?

    Vail Corp stock price decline has attracted the attention of a very predatory law firm. Basically, the case is that Vail's core business model is unsustainable and they damn well knew it.

    What can can I say? It couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch of people, I guess.
    Not to take Vail’s side, but what’s the theory here? If it was obvious that the business model was unsustainable why invest? If it wasn’t obvious to investors, can you presume it was obvious to Vail? Or was Vail lying about something?

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,002
    Since when does it matter if a business model is sustainable?
    Line go up or nothing.
    Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a corporations unbridled greed dyck them up, but if anything, lawsuits have been for lack thereof.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,002
    And I'm not gonna pretend I'm not scared sometimes on Snowbowl's lifts.
    The thing about riblets is they just aren't idiot proof. And they are light and do swing. Any operation outside the norm seems to break them, or a person, or both.
    In a way, they're like cars from the same era compared to cars today. Your average crossover is like a different species compared to a sedan from when they used to make riblets. Maybe it'll be time for them to go away soon. Maybe that time is now. Having a main lift that is old, a little difficult, and can't absorb any user or operator error isn't great.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Greater Drictor Wydaho
    Posts
    5,638
    Quote Originally Posted by J. Barron DeJong View Post
    Not to take Vail’s side, but what’s the theory here? If it was obvious that the business model was unsustainable why invest? If it wasn’t obvious to investors, can you presume it was obvious to Vail? Or was Vail lying about something?
    Like I said, it's a "predatory" firm that specializes in wringing multimillion dollar settlements out of corporate scoundrels who just pass those costs on to the customers.

    Yay, corporate monopoly skiing. Its soooooo awesome.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,364
    Quote Originally Posted by neufox47 View Post
    Mine wasn’t as bad but in 98’ I was riding a lift at Indian Head and it started swinging side to side, kept getting worse until it swung into the tower and got caught on the tower guard. It pulled the chair back then ripped it off the cable. I and the chair fell 20’ and broke my arm and thumb. Indian Head blamed me for shaking the lift. Engineers report found they had modified the tower guards putting them too far out and made it so the chair gained sideways momentum. Attorney was totally incompetent and just kept pushing us to settle. Mediators recommended $50k in damages but Indian Head refused and offered $25K. Attorney told us we had little choice but to accept or spend $10s of thousands of dollars to take it to trial. Engineer cost $10k, attorney took $8k, and the health insurer who paid my medical bills took $10k. His practice went under a year later.
    JFC. That's crazy.

    Many of us are risk takers moreso than the average person I suppose, so if this happened to the average person or risk averse person it would create a tremendous amount of mental trauma. That alone deserves a big settlement in court. How many average skiers would never ride a lift again if they were in your or Frozens shoes...I think the majority.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,842
    Ever notice that they put bamboo in front of manmade obstacles, like old lift tower bases sticking out of the snow, but not rocks and stumps. I don't know if it would actually make a difference, but some lawyer obviously thought it did.

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,636
    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    The thing about riblets is they just aren't idiot proof. And they are light and do swing. Any operation outside the norm seems to break them, or a person, or both.
    In a way, they're like cars from the same era compared to cars today. Your average crossover is like a different species compared to a sedan from when they used to make riblets. Maybe it'll be time for them to go away soon. Maybe that time is now. Having a main lift that is old, a little difficult, and can't absorb any user or operator error isn't great.
    Riblets use a grip which is woven into the haul rope which seems to amplify any chair swinging caused by wind or awkward loading or people squirming around/bouncing in their seat. It also seems to transmit the movement to the chairs above and below through torquing the cable or something. I spent most of my one season as a liftie babysitting a Riblet with two loading stations, a mid and a top. It was wild.

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,364
    That's just being responsible. When I cut a blow down on a mtb trail I make damn sure it's out of the way and won't cause a pedal strike. If it's there naturally it is what it is, but as soon as a human touches something it should be their responsibility to make sure it won't impose on the natural flow of things. Of course that's just my personal opinion and with ski areas they've moved half the mtn around...so

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    I’ll pay less to ride a Riblet.

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,533
    I used to pay less to ride riblets and still do. Ahh, that sweet gentle swing as you duck your head and make sure the board doesn't slam the tower as you wait for the wind to make it's presence known all the while awaiting the sweet sweet pow.

    Sent from my SM-S236DL using Tapatalk

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,002
    Quote Originally Posted by Brownski View Post
    Riblets use a grip which is woven into the haul rope which seems to amplify any chair swinging caused by wind or awkward loading or people squirming around/bouncing in their seat. It also seems to transmit the movement to the chairs above and below through torquing the cable or something. I spent most of my one season as a liftie babysitting a Riblet with two loading stations, a mid and a top. It was wild.
    Oh, do tell. Where was this horror show?
    Quote Originally Posted by lifelinksplit View Post
    I used to pay less to ride riblets and still do. Ahh, that sweet gentle swing as you duck your head and make sure the board doesn't slam the tower as you wait for the wind to make it's presence known all the while awaiting the sweet sweet pow.

    Sent from my SM-S236DL using Tapatalk
    Bridger riblet in a crosswind was kinda scary.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    3,636
    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Oh, do tell. Where was this horror show?.
    Alpine Meadows 94/95 The Weasel double chair. It really was a shit show but I had a lot fun. I described some of of it for NYSB a few years ago

    https://nyskiblog.com/the-old-fashioned-stop-n-go/

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,364
    Quote Originally Posted by Brownski View Post
    Alpine Meadows 94/95 The Weasel double chair. It really was a shit show but I had a lot fun. I described some of of it for NYSB a few years ago

    https://nyskiblog.com/the-old-fashioned-stop-n-go/
    Ha! Shocking! An asshole at Kmart!?

    Hey, you can have you're own Riblet for 5k
    https://skiliftdesigns.com/products/...cIVeLYEFpB2Y5I

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Wasatch
    Posts
    7,534
    It’s a ski area there can’t be an avalanche was the craziest one I heard on the lifts It’s nature and you need to own your responsibility!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    I need to go to Utah.
    Utah?
    Yeah, Utah. It's wedged in between Wyoming and Nevada. You've seen pictures of it, right?

    So after 15 years we finally made it to Utah.....


    Thanks BCSAR and POWMOW Ski Patrol for rescues

    8, 17, 13, 18, 16, 18, 20, 19, 16, 24, 32, 35

    2021/2022 (13/15)

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,842
    You've obviously never skied in SE Michigan.

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane/Schweitzer
    Posts
    6,892
    Adding to this thread. Although Im not a big Vail fan, this seems pretty ludicrous to me:

    Swallowed by Snow: Lawsuit Filed Against Tahoe Ski Resort

    https://www.powder.com/news/heavenly...ow-lawsuit-ski

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,268
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldMember View Post
    Adding to this thread. Although Im not a big Vail fan, this seems pretty ludicrous to me: Swallowed by Snow: Lawsuit Filed Against Tahoe Ski Resort https://www.powder.com/news/heavenly...ow-lawsuit-ski
    Yeah - that lawsuite stinks of horseshit.

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,617
    Article mentioned sink so many times, I did my dishes.

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    I can still smell Poutine.
    Posts
    26,658
    Funny. My reaction was a little different, but it still involved the sink.

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,268
    Quote Originally Posted by riser4 View Post
    Funny. My reaction was a little different, but it still involved the sink.
    I chukkled.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    24,133
    Due to the way the snowpack was, the powder was deceptively loose. Due to the blasting, the top layer of the snowpack appeared solid, with little in the way of visible valleys, multiple small changes in height, or other signs that typically accompany particularly loose snowpack, said the court filing of the mountain's conditions" The lawsuit also notes that despite the increased the risk of powder collapse due to the storm, and the avalanche mitigation performed that morning which increased the risk of a sink in, Heavenly did not schedule additional ski patrollers to keep an eye out for seeming holes or snow moving towards a center of a circle, both key signs of sink in risks," and ultimately could have seen Whelan and prevented his death.



    ***************Warning, you are entering a mountain environment.*****************

    Fuck Vail and sorry this guy died but WTF? I cannot wait for the Plaintiffs Attorney to try and find and expert witness on the subject of Powder Collapse.
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •