Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 60

Thread: Do Gore-Tex 3L ski pants still exist?

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,942
    Quote Originally Posted by dexterq20 View Post
    Thanks everyone, this is helpful. Crazy how so many brands have shifted to outer thigh vents instead of inner. Must be easier/cheaper to produce. And those Norrona Lofoten pants are nuts - $950?? Holy hell. No thanks.
    Call me biased as one of the first Norrona dealers in canuckistan but they could be one of the best pants you'll ever use. Their stuff is the bomb, it fits better and lasts longer that almost everything I've seen.
    We carry Arc'teryx, Patagonia, TNF, Rossi and Black Diamond for reference.
    what's orange and looks good on hippies?
    fire

    rails are for trains
    If I had a dollar for every time capitalism was blamed for problems caused by the government I'd be a rich fat film maker in a baseball hat.

    www.theguideshut.ca

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by dexterq20 View Post
    I know bibs are all the rage these days, but there are still some geezers out there like me who prefer pants. It seems that virtually all manufacturers have shifted their high-end Gore-Tex 3L offerings from pants to bibs, obviously due to consumer demand. Who still makes Gore-Tex 3L ski pants? I'm having a helluva time finding any. (Yes, Patagonia makes the Untracked pants, but they don't have inner thigh venting, so they're a hard "no go" for me.) There are some options out there from Mammut and TNF that are built for mountaineering, but I'm looking for actual ski pants that feature a roomier fit, scuff guards, plenty of pockets, etc. And no, I'm not looking for alternative materials to Gore-Tex - I'm 100% drunk on the Gore-Tex Kool-Aid. Thanks gang.
    I don't what people actually buy, but GORE-TEX garment producers are trying to pivot from ePTFE membranes (both regular and Pro) to ePE with a smaller environmental impact - Arc'teryx, for instance, has ePE fabric on the Sabre line now and only a few "hard core heritage" SKU's like the Alpha SV have old-school GORE-TEX Pro. I imagine they are going through sales numbers and discontinuing some ePTFE 3L models that don't really sell.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    170
    TREW makes 3L pants, though it’s not Gore-Tex. I wore them in a lot of conditions last year. They work great.

    https://trewgear.com/collections/men...t-primo-outlet

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    7B Idaho
    Posts
    1,055
    I know you're not looking for Goretex alternatives but in classic internet forum style I will suggest something without Goretex.

    Flylow makes pants that tick all your other boxes of "ski pants that feature a roomier fit, scuff guards, plenty of pockets, etc" and with a different brand 3L fabric.

    10-15y ago I was only interested in Goretex shell jackets/pants and no other fabrics, but Goretex has changed (i.e. the DWR is better for the environment but not as durable) and the other fabrics have caught up; for mechanized skiing I don't think there is a difference in fabric performance. I just got new bibs this season and went with Flylow for price and feature set, essentially ignoring any difference between Goretex and the Flylow Intuitive 3L fabric.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    10,500
    Just got old school Arc'teryx pants on eBay like new for 170

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,741
    If you are an XL, I just listed some Arc Sabre Gore Pro pants in gear swap w/ minimal use.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    Duno about those other brands but a great thing about the deadbird stuff is that warranty is warranty, they don't care if you have the bill

    A buddy got warranty on a shell left in her shop, it had a broken zipper and that powder cord around the bottom hem came off, if that heat sealed bottom hem lets go its an instant warranty job from what i understand

    and BTW duck tape officialy voids warranty but they will probably just mention it and give you the replacement
    Last edited by XXX-er; 10-06-2024 at 01:24 PM.
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    7B Idaho
    Posts
    1,055
    They don't always give you the replacement, they will give you some calculated value which may certainly not replace your garment. I tried to warranty a GTX jacket and pants last year, both OG made in Canada - the good stuff. Seams failed on the garments but otherwise they were still working well (the zippers were only glued/bonded, not sewn, so they pulled apart when the glue got old. Arc refused to fix and gave me peanuts for the value because they were 10+ years old (but other than the seam failures, they were in great shape and still working well). Patagonia probably would have fixed my stuff instead.

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    I could add it has sounded like whomever does the arcterxy warranty in yurp trys to screw over the customer as if it is actulay their own money

    but I have never had a probelm so I keep buying the stuff
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Golden B.C.
    Posts
    651
    Burton AK tusk bibs.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by skis_the_trees View Post
    I know you're not looking for Goretex alternatives but in classic internet forum style I will suggest something without Goretex.

    Flylow makes pants that tick all your other boxes of "ski pants that feature a roomier fit, scuff guards, plenty of pockets, etc" and with a different brand 3L fabric.

    10-15y ago I was only interested in Goretex shell jackets/pants and no other fabrics, but Goretex has changed (i.e. the DWR is better for the environment but not as durable) and the other fabrics have caught up; for mechanized skiing I don't think there is a difference in fabric performance. I just got new bibs this season and went with Flylow for price and feature set, essentially ignoring any difference between Goretex and the Flylow Intuitive 3L fabric.
    Thanks. I've owned a few Flylow pieces recently (including last year's Chemical pants and Lab Coat) and have been thoroughly unimpressed by the fit. All their stuff I've tried (especially their jackets) seems to be cut for short fat people. Not a fan.

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,001
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    I don't what people actually buy, but GORE-TEX garment producers are trying to pivot from ePTFE membranes (both regular and Pro) to ePE with a smaller environmental impact - Arc'teryx, for instance, has ePE fabric on the Sabre line now and only a few "hard core heritage" SKU's like the Alpha SV have old-school GORE-TEX Pro. I imagine they are going through sales numbers and discontinuing some ePTFE 3L models that don't really sell.
    Interesting. Is there a meaningful difference for the end user?
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    West
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Interesting. Is there a meaningful difference for the end user?
    To be determined. If you're to believe the marketing from the major outerwear manufacturers, the answer is no. In reality... I don't think anyone really knows yet.

    The change has been spurred by REI choosing to no longer sell products containing PFAS (aka Teflon, aka "forever chemicals") for environmental reasons. Last I checked, the deadline they set for this was January 2025, but this may have changed. Gore-Tex as we used to know it was essentially non-stick Teflon cookware in the form of a membrane sewn into clothing. Since Patagonia, TNF, Arc'teryx, etc. (and WL Gore, by extension) can't afford to lose REI's business, they've all been forced to develop and adopt a new, PFAS-free, environmentally-friendly version of Gore-Tex across their lines. Alternatively, some brands, such as Spyder, have chosen to stop using Gore-Tex altogether and instead have switched to alternative waterproof/breathable membranes.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    10,500
    Quote Originally Posted by dexterq20 View Post
    Thanks. I've owned a few Flylow pieces recently (including last year's Chemical pants and Lab Coat) and have been thoroughly unimpressed by the fit. All their stuff I've tried (especially their jackets) seems to be cut for short fat people. Not a fan.
    I too tried the chemical pant. I am short and fat and for real- weird cut. Just bought some gloves this am though. Cool company story

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    Carnorum Regio- Oltre Piave
    Posts
    143
    i'm also a big fan of pants (way too hot for bibs where i live/ski).

    I had the gravity and vertical 2/3L pants from peak performance, should be standard GTX pro. Since i'm a fan of those like XXXer you get nice horizontal-opening pockets (plus 2 standard vertical ones, i keep my beacon in one of those), fabric is decently sturdy, fit is comfy/roomy. Only thing you might not like is that vents are on the outside of the thighs (no net or lining). You also get the double option for cinched waist straps and standard belt loops.

    used em a lot and i have to say they worked pretty well.

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mammoth Lakes
    Posts
    3,682
    Quote Originally Posted by XXX-er View Post
    Duno about those other brands but a great thing about the deadbird stuff is that warranty is warranty, they don't care if you have the bill

    A buddy got warranty on a shell left in her shop, it had a broken zipper and that powder cord around the bottom hem came off, if that heat sealed bottom hem lets go its an instant warranty job from what i understand

    and BTW duck tape officialy voids warranty but they will probably just mention it and give you the replacement
    My experience w/ Arc warranty is less than great.

    Had a shell that the bonded seams just fell apart making the jacket useless. They offered me 40% off retail of a new one. On another piece, I believe stinger pants which I loved, they gave me nothing. They weren't waterproof anymore and I got zilch. Not super impressed... In fact anyone want to trade anything for this 40% off retail credit I still have? Just nothing I want to pay that much $$$ for from Arc.

    That is worse than credit for the past retail price of the garment which is what Marmot will offer. I have always been given that on Marmot with likely 6 claims over a 30yr period, assuming they don't have the item still in stock, which they will send you if they do. Example: If the retail price when new was $400 they give you $400 credit toward a new piece. Now usually the new piece is now $450 so you need to chip in the $50 or pool credit from multiple claims. Seems fair. Also had great experiences with Pataguchi as well.

    To OP: I found some Elevenate 3L Gore Tex pants this summer on super sale that seem awesome. Pretty sure they are outer thigh vents, but to be fair, I think all my pants over the yrs have been outer thigh vents. Always seemed like they were more exposed/open to ventilate rather than stuck in between legs, but then again, I haven't had inner thigh vents so don't know.

    They are getting harder to find...
    He who has the most fun wins!

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    西 雅 圖
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Interesting. Is there a meaningful difference for the end user?
    Word of mouth and limited lab testing that I've seen/heard indicates the new ePE 3L stuff is similarly waterproof as the old ePTFE stuff, but not as breathable as GORE-TEX Pro. For regular consumers, though, the end of the ePTFE membranes we've been using for decades is coming soon (kind of like non-Gripwalk recreational boots and effective C8 or C6 DWR solutions or fluoro waxes).

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Where full grown men pretend to be cowboys
    Posts
    637
    Quote Originally Posted by dexterq20 View Post
    The change has been spurred by REI choosing to no longer sell products containing PFAS
    Gore and other manufacturers reacted to a California law banning the sale of PFAS in textiles, not to an REI store policy. Other states have similar laws in the pipeline too.

    But here to +1 older Sabre pants, bibs and jackets.
    And -1 Arc warranty

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,001
    Quote Originally Posted by gregL View Post
    Word of mouth and limited lab testing that I've seen/heard indicates the new ePE 3L stuff is similarly waterproof as the old ePTFE stuff, but not as breathable as GORE-TEX Pro. For regular consumers, though, the end of the ePTFE membranes we've been using for decades is coming soon (kind of like non-Gripwalk recreational boots and effective C8 or C6 DWR solutions or fluoro waxes).
    Feels a little like greenwashing since it's still plastic. Maybe they'll get the breathability better in a couple years.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    Posts
    23,001
    Quote Originally Posted by CallMeAl View Post
    Gore and other manufacturers reacted to a California law banning the sale of PFAS in textiles, not to an REI store policy. Other states have similar laws in the pipeline too.

    But here to +1 older Sabre pants, bibs and jackets.
    And -1 Arc warranty
    Oh.
    No longer stuck.

    Quote Originally Posted by stuckathuntermtn View Post
    Just an uneducated guess.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    7B Idaho
    Posts
    1,055
    Quote Originally Posted by dexterq20 View Post
    Thanks. I've owned a few Flylow pieces recently (including last year's Chemical pants and Lab Coat) and have been thoroughly unimpressed by the fit. All their stuff I've tried (especially their jackets) seems to be cut for short fat people. Not a fan.
    That could certainly be true. The pants I got this year were my first Flylow item that isn't gloves/mitts, but I got medium tall size and are a good 2-3" longer inseam than normal mediums. They are certainly a bit more steezy but for inbounds it seems fine. For touring I certainly favor a trim euro fit.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Denver<C O
    Posts
    202
    Flylow does make the Chemical pant in tall sizes....large long fits me 200#, 6'2" well....my 34 waist a bit snug in large long FYI......Chet

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    O+Positive
    Posts
    3,175
    In the snowboard apparel world, Burton still makes the AK 3L Hover and Jones has the Shralpinist.

    I've had 3 pairs of the Hovers over the past 18 years or so, Burton AK warranty is pretty solid. Replaced a 6 year old pair for me a few years back for a broken zipper, just had to provide original receipts. Had the Jones for 2 seasons, no issues.
    Montani Semper Liberi

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    1,500
    Bibs and pants both suck.

    The answer is 1/2 bib, but alas

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by Hood26 View Post
    Bibs and pants both suck.

    The answer is 1/2 bib, but alas
    Not gore Tex but Mammut haldigrad?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •