Check Out Our Shop
Page 75 of 84 FirstFirst ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 ... LastLast
Results 1,851 to 1,875 of 2078

Thread: Climate Change

  1. #1851
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Bunion 2020 View Post
    Fusion by 2028? Utter bullshit. While people buy electric cars and do the laundry in cold water, AI and crypto overwhelm our meager efforts to use less fossil fuel while making a few people rich(er) and providing zero benefit to humanity. It's enough to make one annoyed.

  2. #1852
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,462
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    Fusion by 2028? Utter bullshit. While people buy electric cars and do the laundry in cold water, AI and crypto overwhelm our meager efforts to use less fossil fuel while making a few people rich(er) and providing zero benefit to humanity. It's enough to make one annoyed.
    I heard an estimate that AI would "need" ~9% of total world electricity.
    Add in another 9%? for crypto currency and there's not much left over for thumb loving primates.

  3. #1853
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,740
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    ... and providing zero benefit to humanity.
    Hey now, we got a "crotcheted" elephant. That's ... something.
    The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.

  4. #1854
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,215
    Quote Originally Posted by californiagrown View Post
    I think it is going to be one of those things where we look back 100 years from now and realize just how fucking dirty/wasteful/awful the early technology was, and regret being scared away and not pushing the technology forward faster.
    Even the early tech has proven to be very safe and reliable when viewed as a whole. But, you can understand why Chernobyl freaked people out.

    On the waste issue, there's like 70,000 tons of high level waste. That certainly sounds like a lot, but it's so dense that the actual volume isn't really that much. It's a solveable problem. Yucca Mountain should have been built. I understand Harry Reid's opposition to it but he should have conceded for the good of the country.

    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    God forsaken desert? The Sonoran and Mojave Deserts are beautiful and incredibly diverse ecosystems. Large portions are already have Federal protections.
    Much of it is beautiful but there's definitely some wasteland-y parts too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buster Highmen View Post
    I'd always thought the worst landscapes are the suburbs where every construct should have a solar panel on it and damn the aesthetics.
    Plus, rooftop solar is perfect for summer peak loads from AC use since those days are always sunny. Building solar farms instead of using all that roof space is crazy. But, power companies don't want to deal with the public for anything but a meter and a bill, and enough members of the public are crazy assholes that you kind of can't fault them for it.

  5. #1855
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Even the early tech has proven to be very safe and reliable when viewed as a whole. But, you can understand why Chernobyl freaked people out.

    On the waste issue, there's like 70,000 tons of high level waste. That certainly sounds like a lot, but it's so dense that the actual volume isn't really that much. It's a solveable problem. Yucca Mountain should have been built. I understand Harry Reid's opposition to it but he should have conceded for the good of the country.



    Much of it is beautiful but there's definitely some wasteland-y parts too.



    .
    The problem with nuclear is the risk of very rare but catastrophic accidents. It's hard to figure the odds and risk/benefit ratio on stuff like that but the problem is that build enough nukes and operate them long enough and the risk of catastrophe becomes non-neglible. The appeal of nukes is the prospect of continuing our current US lifestyle without inconvenience. If we want our grandchildren to have decent lives we can't continue. And the cost of our lifestyle is not just energy. Suppose we stop making and using forever chemicals. Feeding 8 billion people takes some nasty chemicals. Things like lithium, and if we go to nukes, uranium have to be mined. Etc etc.

  6. #1856
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Even the early tech has proven to be very safe and reliable when viewed as a whole. But, you can understand why Chernobyl freaked people out.

    On the waste issue, there's like 70,000 tons of high level waste. That certainly sounds like a lot, but it's so dense that the actual volume isn't really that much. It's a solveable problem. Yucca Mountain should have been built. I understand Harry Reid's opposition to it but he should have conceded for the good of the country.



    Much of it is beautiful but there's definitely some wasteland-y parts too.



    .
    The problem with nuclear is the risk of very rare but catastrophic accidents. It's hard to figure the odds and risk/benefit ratio on stuff like that but the problem is that build enough nukes and operate them long enough and the risk of catastrophe becomes non-neglible. The appeal of nukes is the prospect of continuing our current US lifestyle without inconvenience. If we want our grandchildren to have decent lives we can't continue. And the cost of our lifestyle is not just energy. Suppose we stop making and using forever chemicals. Feeding 8 billion people takes some nasty chemicals. Things like lithium, and if we go to nukes, uranium have to be mined. Etc etc.

    As far as wasteland in the Mojave--there is Las Vegas. (But seriously, the value of an ecosystem is not whether humans find it appealing.)

  7. #1857
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    2 hours from anything
    Posts
    11,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    Plus, rooftop solar is perfect for summer peak loads from AC use since those days are always sunny. Building solar farms instead of using all that roof space is crazy. But, power companies don't want to deal with the public for anything but a meter and a bill, and enough members of the public are crazy assholes that you kind of can't fault them for it.
    Rooftop is always going to be significantly more expensive to install. Frankly it makes more sense to only do utility scale solar farms, except the utility companies haven’t been willing to Acton their own, hence rooftop.

  8. #1858
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Before
    Posts
    28,761
    The inference from the research on rooftop and other instantiations that sit perpendicular to sun rays indicates that fences or vertical mounts may be more efficient.
    Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
    >>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<

  9. #1859
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,076
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    On the waste issue, there's like 70,000 tons of high level waste. That certainly sounds like a lot, but it's so dense that the actual volume isn't really that much. It's a solveable problem. Yucca Mountain should have been built. I understand Harry Reid's opposition to it but he should have conceded for the good of the country.
    If i am not mistaken you are a literal expert in an adjacent field, right? So i would assume you know better than most on here. But...

    My concerns about waste storage are more along the lines of the high level wastes staying highly radioactive for hundreds of thousands of years- we have no idea what hidden seismic faults, climate changes etc will take place in the next 200,000 years. Yucca mountain may have a gnarly deep fault underneath it that is undiscovered, or climate change may turn that area into a rainforest in 50,000 years, or both, and then we have polluted an aquifer, or fertile land that we currently have no idea will even exist. The timescale for high/medium level radioactive waste is so long that we are taking a fairly uneducated guess as to where its safe to store it... we only "know" its safe in the short term. And there is only a finite capacity at each storage site with huge opposition to building new storage sites, so you end up storing waste in substandard containment vessels on the site of the reactor facitilites, which then leak and pollute the area (this is currently happening at numerous facilities across the country)

    And then there is the interesting challenge of labeling the waste so that future humans/beings, who do not know of any current languages or symbols and who may be more or less advanced than we are now, will know that the stuff is toxic AF and to stay away. Actually fairly interesting linguistics/symbology problem.



    All of that to say that if we can reuse/recycle spent fuel, and/or solve the "radioactive waste" problem, then its a no-brainer to utilize nuclear energy. And it sounds like new tech is very promising on this front.

  10. #1860
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    2 hours from anything
    Posts
    11,076
    In case anyone was wondering June 24 was the hottest June on record, extending the streak to over 1 yr.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  11. #1861
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,836
    Donner Lake is comfortable for swimming. Normally that's in late August, if at all. And that;s despite a snowy winter.

  12. #1862
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Where the sheets have no stains
    Posts
    24,133
    One solution to one very specific problem. And fuck everyone else.

    PLAQUEMINES PARISH, La. —

    The marshes that blanket this pancake-flat parish south of New Orleans stretch for miles, strewn with small streams that flow into the Gulf of Mexico. A lone four-lane road goes south past a Navy air base, an idle industrial site, a coal export terminal and a handful of small storm-battered communities.

    Then, suddenly, a gigantic facility rises from the wetlands. Cranes dot the skyline. They hover over crews that are installing a jumble of pipes, pumps, storage tanks and two 720-megawatt power plants — equipment needed to freeze natural gas into a liquid form so it can be shipped around the world.

    It might seem like a risky location for a $21 billion liquefied natural gas plant, given this region’s ferocious hurricanes and sea levels that are rising faster than almost anywhere else on the planet. But the company building this plant, Arlington, Va.-based Venture Global, says it has an answer to these threats: a 26-f00t-high steel sea wall that surrounds the 632-acre site, twice the size of Washington’s National Mall.

    The fortress highlights a crucial tension for this region of the country. The sea is rising here and the land is rapidly sinking, in large part driven by decades of oil and gas drilling and the planet-warming emissions that come from the burning of those fossil fuels. That is accelerating the destruction of wetlands, which serve as a critical barrier, and speeding up flooding across the coast, often with less advantaged communities most vulnerable.
    https://wapo.st/3zq8niG
    I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.

    "Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"

  13. #1863
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    In the swamp
    Posts
    12,083
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    Donner Lake is comfortable for swimming. Normally that's in late August, if at all. And that;s despite a snowy winter.
    The signs are everywhere. Yet we ain’t doing shit and are barreling towards having another 4 year massive setback if Trump is elected.

  14. #1864
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    752
    Don’t worry Nuclear winter will kick in before January.

  15. #1865
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    In croc heaven
    Posts
    6
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0901.jpg 
Views:	145 
Size:	241.5 KB 
ID:	498848

    That’s 107 in freedom units. In winter. New high score.

    Season’s gone to complete shit. August is historically the peak snow depth month but most everything is closing down. New normal they say. Great.

    Epic pass sales numbers for 2025 are gonna be interesting. Rumour has it they were down 22% for 2024. Vail being Vail, they jacked the pre-sale price up by $50 to $999 for 2025. Slow learners or see the writing on the wall, anyone’s guess.

  16. #1866
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    7,413

  17. #1867
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,740
    Quote Originally Posted by The SnowShow View Post
    The signs are everywhere. Yet we ain’t doing shit and are barreling towards having another 4 year massive setback if Trump is elected.
    Dems should just make this an issue of self-interest, i.e., how does this impact you and your pocketbook?

    A discussion focusing on home insurance policy costs/availability would be a good start. Clearly the insurance industry doesn't think climate change is a hoax.

    https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com...er-462752.aspx
    The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.

  18. #1868
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    https://makesunsets.com/

    Let’s go geoengineering!!!

    Sadly nuclear power was the first victim in the saving private earth video
    Kill all the telemarkers
    But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
    Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
    Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason

  19. #1869
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,836
    "Buy cooling credits"
    I knew there had to be a catch.

  20. #1870
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    7,413
    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    Let’s go geoengineering!!!
    We're already doing geoengineering. Manmade, or “anthropogenic” CO2 and other greenhouse atmospheric gases—additional and apart from natural carbon cycle greenhouse gas sources—exceeds 50 billion tons. So the question is should we do other kinds of geoengineering too?


    Quote Originally Posted by Core Shot View Post
    Sadly nuclear power was the first victim in the saving private earth video
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    "Buy cooling credits"
    I knew there had to be a catch.
    heh. Nuclear power the first victim, voluntary carbon market the second.

  21. #1871
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,403
    Quote Originally Posted by fomofo View Post
    Dems should just make this an issue of self-interest, i.e., how does this impact you and your pocketbook?

    A discussion focusing on home insurance policy costs/availability would be a good start. Clearly the insurance industry doesn't think climate change is a hoax.

    https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com...er-462752.aspx
    I can't afford to vote Democrat anymore. THEY affect our pocket book.

    Seriously though, there's millions of poor people that are trying to figure out how to feed their kids this week, I doubt they are really worried about the climate 100+ years from now.
    dirtbag, not a dentist

  22. #1872
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    the Vortex
    Posts
    994
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_20240901_210714_Samsung Internet.jpg 
Views:	129 
Size:	248.5 KB 
ID:	499088
    yepper

  23. #1873
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Edge of the Great Basin
    Posts
    7,413
    Past global climate change, not regional variation, took place over tens-of-thousands, hundreds-of-thousands, or millions of years. Now, the rate of warming in recent decades is unprecedented. That's because the earth hadn't seen CO2 above 300 PPM (parts per million) for over a million years up until the early 1900s. We're now above 420 PPM, a greater than 50% increase since the pre-industrial era.

  24. #1874
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,530
    It’s always hot this time of year in central Arizona, but 2024 is proving to be an endless summer with especially high temperatures in Phoenix. On Tuesday, the city hit its 100th straight day with at least 100 degree temperatures. That’s long since shattered the record of 76 days in a row set back in 1993, according to data from the National Weather Service.
    Well, it is a dry heat...

  25. #1875
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,836
    Quote Originally Posted by MultiVerse View Post
    Past global climate change, not regional variation, took place over tens-of-thousands, hundreds-of-thousands, or millions of years. Now, the rate of warming in recent decades is unprecedented. That's because the earth hadn't seen CO2 above 300 PPM (parts per million) for over a million years up until the early 1900s. We're now above 420 PPM, a greater than 50% increase since the pre-industrial era.
    Not sure why you replied. He's obviously making fun of the deniers. No one on this forum could possibly be that dumb. ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •