Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 62

Thread: Marker Alpinist Long Term Review

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Side WA
    Posts
    623
    Quote Originally Posted by Dromond View Post
    Do you have the brake or brakeless model? Wondering if brakes support the heel at all.
    Brakeless long travel version. I believe the nice ski feel comes from the kiss gap at the heel.

    Had my first release in a crash 2 weeks ago. I run the 12 springs with lateral release set to 10. Not sure what kind of release it was, but I'm glad to know they do come off when needed.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    91
    Quote Originally Posted by kamtron View Post
    Brakeless long travel version. I believe the nice ski feel comes from the kiss gap at the heel.

    Had my first release in a crash 2 weeks ago. I run the 12 springs with lateral release set to 10. Not sure what kind of release it was, but I'm glad to know they do come off when needed.
    I tried the brake version for a few days. Brakeless is definitely the way to go. The brakes that come with these are very flimsy and extremely annoying to lock/unlock.

    My other complaint is that the riser sucks. It's not just that there's only one, fairly low, riser height. It also seems to be mostly held by friction, instead via cammed spring (dynafit) or magnet (atk). This means that if you are flipping it with a pole, you have to push it the whole way to where you want it instead of just flicking it up/down and letting it set itself to its natural position. I think a lot of people set and forget riser positions, but if you skin a complex terrain and adjust the risers a lot, there are better bindings.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2022
    Posts
    321
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0512.JPG 
Views:	176 
Size:	186.2 KB 
ID:	491686
    Mediocre product photo of the new “free” heel. Looks like the track gets a little oversized and the heel platform has been changed and texturized, i spoke to a rep about these a while back and he said it’ll be height adjustable and i think the brakes will be removable.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by shitskier View Post
    I tried the brake version for a few days. Brakeless is definitely the way to go. The brakes that come with these are very flimsy and extremely annoying to lock/unlock.

    My other complaint is that the riser sucks. It's not just that there's only one, fairly low, riser height. It also seems to be mostly held by friction, instead via cammed spring (dynafit) or magnet (atk). This means that if you are flipping it with a pole, you have to push it the whole way to where you want it instead of just flicking it up/down and letting it set itself to its natural position. I think a lot of people set and forget riser positions, but if you skin a complex terrain and adjust the risers a lot, there are better bindings.
    These bindings work best when you just use flat and the 1 high riser (height closer to most medium’s). When you’re not using the riser flip it to the vertical position, not all the way back. It makes flicking it with the pole easier. I’ve never had mine come loose.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    129
    Link to some press release in france regarding alpinist free:

    https://www.skieur.com/actu-nouveaut...-dalbello-2025

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    3,341
    Quote Originally Posted by EricB View Post
    These bindings work best when you just use flat and the 1 high riser (height closer to most medium’s). When you’re not using the riser flip it to the vertical position, not all the way back. It makes flicking it with the pole easier. I’ve never had mine come loose.
    This exactly. 90 % of the time this is how In use the aplinist and it works great even on the stupid steep skin tracks in the wasatch. Low angle hippy pow lapping I’ll use them like a race binding, using the medium position to cover the pins. They are far and away the best skiing tech binding I’ve ever skied.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Geopolis
    Posts
    17,150
    Quote Originally Posted by altacoup View Post
    This exactly. 90 % of the time this is how In use the aplinist and it works great even on the stupid steep skin tracks in the wasatch. Low angle hippy pow lapping I’ll use them like a race binding, using the medium position to cover the pins. They are far and away the best skiing tech binding I’ve ever skied.
    that's high praise.

    i never mounted the two pairs i bought and couldn't even get less than what i paid on sale....

    maybe i should keep them.
    j'ai des grands instants de lucididididididididi

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    3,341
    I would at least mount and ski 1 of them. I have a pair of ski trab vario 2 bindings I’m going to mount on some skis. Other than that my 3 other pin bindings set ups are all alpinist now. My old dynafits are basically unskiable now.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,643
    I noticed a friend's heel does not spring back to center. That does not seem right. Any ideas?

  10. #35
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by Cocximus View Post
    I noticed a friend's heel does not spring back to center. That does not seem right. Any ideas?
    Remove the heel tower from the base plate, clean, and grease.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,757
    Anyone know how much grams the new alpenis freeride spacer will add? Also, will it be available as an add-on for existing clamps?

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Thomas View Post
    Anyone know how much grams the new alpenis freeride spacer will add? Also, will it be available as an add-on for existing clamps?
    I think it’s a strap on


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,643
    I looked at four more alpinists pairs and three of them had sticky towers. The only one without sticky towers had brakes.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    523
    Alpinist free on the website.
    Comparable weight to the old version
    Wider heel
    Per skimo, the "freeride spacer" is adjustable
    35mm BSL adjustment range is a nice improvement

    https://skimo.co/marker-alpinist-free-13
    https://markerbindings.com/en-us/p/a...-bindings-2025
    Last edited by EricB; 07-24-2024 at 11:11 AM.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    5,102
    Am I right the freeride spacer is not backward compatible with the older version?

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by cat in january View Post
    Am I right the freeride spacer is not backward compatible with the older version?
    The heel looks completely different. But that's a question for Skimo.co or another legitimate shop/tech.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,757
    Somebody in SLC should go down to Skimo and ax the question. Would be nice to know prior to the season since I got a couple of pair to mount and would do the new version if I can't add the spacer to the old ones

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    5,102
    I suppose if Marker is not making the spacer available for independent sale, then a mute question. And knowing Marker if they sell it separately it will cost $125. Their leashes are way overpriced.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    333
    Quote Originally Posted by cat in january View Post
    I suppose if Marker is not making the spacer available for independent sale, then a mute question. And knowing Marker if they sell it separately it will cost $125. Their leashes are way overpriced.
    I bought the leashes straight from Marker for $31 last fall. Not bad I’d say.

    Regarding the Free, Skimo sais the brake has the freeride spacer attached to it, so no dice if you remove them.
    Last edited by Tjaardbreeuwer; 07-29-2024 at 08:01 PM.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Maine Coast
    Posts
    5,102
    I see that. Looks like they may have smartened up. No picture so hard to tell if a design change or just a price change.


    Used to be $60. https://skimo.co/marker-alpinist-leashes

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    333
    Quote Originally Posted by cat in january View Post
    I see that. Looks like they may have smartened up. No picture so hard to tell if a design change or just a price change.


    Used to be $60. https://skimo.co/marker-alpinist-leashes
    Those look just like the ones I got.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    5,126
    Anyone come across hacks to make the brakes easier to use? Those stupid little wires needing to gonibtobthevtightvtolerance homes is pretty frustrating. I’ve consisted drilling them out a touch..
    I rip the groomed on tele gear

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,943
    Quote Originally Posted by cat in january View Post
    Am I right the freeride spacer is not backward compatible with the older version?
    Sadly, it will not be (at least this season). I was really hoping that it would be an addition, rather than a new binding completely.

    Mount pattern is the same and supposedly it will only come with 105mm brakes standard... though Marker's website shows a brakeless version as an option.

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    333
    My feelings are mixed about the Alpinist.

    Step in is easy, pretty normal. Locking/unlocking the toes was too hard, as I mentioned above, but easy fix. That was for both pairs, but my friends old pair, and his newer pair both didn’t have this issue.

    Low delta is a perfect for me. Skis well enough, but I’m not picky in that regard.
    Riser works fine for me.
    Stepping into the heel (on the 10), requires a fair bit of force (27.5 boot, 180 lbs). Not ideal in some situations, but not a big issue either.

    Rotating the heels is the big downside for me.
    It requires a lot of force, and due to the single, short riser, you can’t get much more leverage. With a moderately heavy pack, it becomes really hard to bend down and get enough leverage on the heel to rotate it.

    I haven’t used any other U spring bindings before, so maybe these issues are par for the course with that design.

    Anyway, I hope this is useful for someone considering these.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,027
    Quote Originally Posted by Tjaardbreeuwer View Post
    Rotating the heels is the big downside for me.
    It requires a lot of force, and due to the single, short riser, you can’t get much more leverage. With a moderately heavy pack, it becomes really hard to bend down and get enough leverage on the heel to rotate it.
    I don't think I've ever rotated my heels. Flap over pins works great. Manipulate the flap with a pole handle.
    "High risers are for people with fused ankles, jongs and dudes who are too fat to see their dick or touch their toes.
    Prove me wrong."
    -I've seen black diamonds!

    throughpolarizedeyes.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •