Check Out Our Shop
Page 34 of 63 FirstFirst ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... LastLast
Results 826 to 850 of 1565

Thread: Soft Snow Gymkhana - The Heritage Lab FR110

  1. #826
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,265
    It makes me so sad that the R110 I demo'ed had a f-ed up tune.

  2. #827
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Vallee Teton
    Posts
    2,729
    Looking forward to getting my 180 cm FR110’s mounted up…


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Aggressive in my own mind

  3. #828
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    It makes me so sad that the R110 I demo'ed had a f-ed up tune.
    don’t worry homie, I actually have a pair reserved for you to try as soon as there is snow

  4. #829
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    PNW -> MSO
    Posts
    8,278
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    don’t worry homie, I actually have a pair reserved for you to try as soon as there is snow
    fkna

  5. #830
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    North Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,030

    Soft Snow Gymkhana - The Heritage Lab FR110

    Quote Originally Posted by hoarhey View Post
    Looking forward to getting my 180 cm FR110’s mounted up…

    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    That will be a very good day.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    It makes me so sad that the R110 I demo'ed had a f-ed up tune.
    Yes this makes me sad for you. My FR110’s initially had a f’ed up tune but after a grind they were awesome.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Last edited by kc_7777; 08-17-2024 at 10:59 AM.
    _________________________________________________
    I love big dumps.

  6. #831
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,511
    The R110 is high on my radar. Hoping to ski a fellow mags this year, NW_Skier. I will probably regret not getting in on this years buy and will be one year older when I do*.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  7. #832
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,468
    Quote Originally Posted by 2FUNKY View Post
    The R110 is high on my radar. Hoping to ski a fellow mags this year, NW_Skier. I will probably regret not getting in on this years buy and will be one year older when I do*.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    We like so many of the same skis that I'm sure you would love them.

    They feel like a skinny Kusala with (obviously) better hard snow performance.

  8. #833
    Join Date
    Apr 2024
    Posts
    299
    Reusing old Marker demo binding holes on FR110s, got some NIB 2016 Marker Jesters. Gonna figure out the perfect mount location for me.

    What glue/epoxy should I use? I might keep the bindings on there for a while longer than just figuring out the mount. Epoxy seems to give me more peace of mind, and I don’t mind doing a little extra work to remove later on.

    I asked elsewhere, but wanted to get it in here too.

  9. #834
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,317
    I'm a novice, but my thinking is that if you plan to remove a binding... your glue should be weak from the first mount. You should be thinking no glue, or at most-- a white wood glue.

    If you plan on redrilling and playing that whole game... epoxy is just going to complicate your world.

  10. #835
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Yeah, most of the strength comes from the threads, not much from the glue, glue is just to keep the water out. So I’d just use something basic if it’s short term. Apologies if you already know all this

    With that being said, slow set marine epoxy seems to be the popular for the best “glue” if that’s what you’re looking for. west systems g flex is a good one


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #836
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by forumskier View Post
    Reusing old Marker demo binding holes on FR110s, got some NIB 2016 Marker Jesters. Gonna figure out the perfect mount location for me.

    What glue/epoxy should I use? I might keep the bindings on there for a while longer than just figuring out the mount. Epoxy seems to give me more peace of mind, and I don’t mind doing a little extra work to remove later on.

    I asked elsewhere, but wanted to get it in here too.
    I use bathroom silicone adhesive from the hardware store for this sort of thing. It is quite solid, with great bond, and highly waterproof, but easy enough to remove when needed too.

  12. #837
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    15,874
    GOOP


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #838
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    1,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Marshal Olson View Post
    I use bathroom silicone adhesive from the hardware store for this sort of thing. It is quite solid, with great bond, and highly waterproof, but easy enough to remove when needed too.
    That’s a good idea


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  14. #839
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,468
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    GOOP


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Super Amazing GOOP!

  15. #840
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    Quote Originally Posted by MagnificentUnicorn View Post
    GOOP


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    So. Just drop the candle wax in the hole?
    Or do I need to get Gwyneth on site to ride the ski first?

    I’m old school epoxy. It does bind the wood fibers. All depends on how solid the wood core is or if you have titanal all under the bindings. If you’re worried about removal you could always lube the screws lightly. With goop.

    The silicone is a perfect sealant. But not sure it can soak into the wood.
    I’ve used carpenters glue in a pinch.
    Kill all the telemarkers
    But they’ll put us in jail if we kill all the telemarkers
    Telemarketers! Kill the telemarketers!
    Oh we can do that. We don’t even need a reason

  16. #841
    Join Date
    Apr 2024
    Posts
    299
    So...Flex Seal?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FlexSealjpg.jpg 
Views:	174 
Size:	614.6 KB 
ID:	498412

    Thanks dudes

  17. #842
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    SW, CO
    Posts
    1,945
    Titebond 2 is basically the same as SVST ski glue and is what I have been using for the past few years with very few issues.... but bathroom adhesive is a new one. Makes sense in this application... might have to give it a try.

  18. #843
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,717
    Ordered up R110s. Pretty amped! Figured combo with my R99 comps for a solid 1 - 2 punch for shallow snow ragging..

  19. #844
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Winthrop, WA.
    Posts
    1,757
    For those of you who want to use epoxy but still have easily removed screws try this - Put epoxy in hole like normal and THINLY coat your screws with clear kiwi shoe polish. I just have a small flannel piece of cloth that is impregnated with polish that applies a light film without any residue buildup. Be sure and get polish clear into the bottom of the threads. The polish acts as a perfect release agent that is thinner than the ones often provided in epoxy kits. I've done this with many rifle and shotgun actions that are MUCH more expensive than any pair of skis and it works perfectly, and with a wide variety of epoxies. The epoxy makes a perfect threaded hole around the screw.

  20. #845
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,791
    So I know I don't even have my skis yet so I should probably just wait and see... but the rocker profile that's currently up on the HL site for the R110 looks nothing like the profile of the ski I was looking at when I did my pre-order...

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  21. #846
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,755
    Hey man! Thanks for inquiring.

    Under foot and inside the wide points of the ski, the shape of the rocker on the production skis is the same as the beta skis and prior cad rendering. The change was to add a little more kick in the tail, bringing it from 2cm of tail height to 4cm of tail height.

    The betas skied rad at -8 to -8.75 but the tail could drag for some skiers when skiing off edge in grabby snow when mounted much more forward than that. I definatly wanted a bigger sweet spot than that, and for the ski to better accommodate more forward mounts than that too, so felt it was important to make the change in production to deliver the best skis possible and not sit on an update. This update solves that small quibble.

    More than happy to unpack in more detail! LMK. Once the skis are in my hands, I will do a tech email on them too.
    Last edited by Marshal Olson; 08-28-2024 at 07:23 PM.

  22. #847
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Boise
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    So I know I don't even have my skis yet so I should probably just wait and see... but the rocker profile that's currently up on the HL site for the R110 looks nothing like the profile of the ski I was looking at when I did my pre-order...

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    I did a double take when I saw this profile on the R110 page too - the tip and tail rise looks more abrupt and extreme than Marshal is describing, not much like the original profile or any of the other R/FR shapes. But I think it may be a feature of the linked drawing not the ski itself… the ski below is the one Marshal sent out in the April design update email as the production version, which matches the described changes and looks much more like a slight modification/improvement on the R110 beta.
    There are lions and there are sheep. So, which one are you?

  23. #848
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,317
    I just spent 20 minutes searching the HL threads trying to find where I had seen that pic. Then I remembered the April email and found it. Came here to post exactly what shank wrote.

    Haha. The universe is playing its synchronicity games today. Fun times.

  24. #849
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,755
    Thanks everyone.

    I will update the HL website with photos of the production topsheets and rocker profiles for every ski we are doing, and of course send out a tech email on all of this in 2-3 weeks (ie as soon as I can).

    given the vigorous nature of bringing all of this to life in a quite short amount of time, I am super grateful to all of the feedback and dialogue on these points and totally welcome follow up q’s any time.

    My apologies if my drive to nail the design got ahead of my communication around these shapes. I will absolutely endeavor to clarify and simplify going forward. I truly appreciate the support and passion for this project.

    of course, if anyone has a change of heart on their preordered skis once pics of the production skis are posted, please just let me know!

  25. #850
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,317
    R110
    OG CAD --> OG Production. --> Ver.2 Production.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot 2024-08-29 at 20.55.56.jpg 
Views:	202 
Size:	384.8 KB 
ID:	498803

    *Please account for various camera optical illusions, shadows, and other lens discrepancies. And also please account for Gaijin's desire to hump this ski.
    Last edited by gaijin; 08-29-2024 at 06:24 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •