Check Out Our Shop
Page 260 of 291 FirstFirst ... 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 ... LastLast
Results 6,476 to 6,500 of 7256

Thread: Anyone have anything they'd like to rant about?

  1. #6476
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The better LA
    Posts
    2,829
    Quote Originally Posted by climberevan View Post
    USFS and others do that around here as well. Often when a new trail is built (usually a dirt sidewalk style one), they decommission the existing user-built trails with extreme prejudice. Even committed scofflaws don't bother to rebuild them, as they tend to totally wreck the surface in addition to putting a ton of shit on top of the trails.

    Net we end up with more trail mileage but less interesting trails. There is so much available land for both! We just need to have SO many more trails so everyone can spread out and have fun.
    Curious about the laws regarding this.
    As I understand, once a "thoroughfare" has been established, whether by walking pathway, game trail, or bike riding, it is legal to continue using it, but you can't modify it, ie, maintenance.
    If that's true, wouldn't it be illegal for FS to close it using modifications such as downing trees?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    After the first three seconds, Corbet's is really pretty average.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Malcolm View Post
    I mean, it's not your fault. They say talent skips a generation.
    But hey, I'm sure your kids will be sharp as tacks.

  2. #6477
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    208 State
    Posts
    2,698
    Quote Originally Posted by MegaStoke View Post
    I’ve been away from Boise for a few years, which trails have they decommissioned now?

    Also, battery chainsaws are quiet, relatively cheap, and carry easily in a backpack. Just sayin’.
    They decommissioned Sweet Pea a few years ago, went in, spent a bunch of time and effort to dig trenches across the trail. The newest decommissioning is an old trail that used to parallel Mr. Big.
    Found out who is in cahoots with the forest service, it's Hoff Timber/Land Company closing all these off because "they don't want people on them" despite the property being Boise National Forest property. I guess even land that touches Hoff Company property is subject to this because, they are a land company.

  3. #6478
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    208 State
    Posts
    2,698
    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    Curious about the laws regarding this.
    As I understand, once a "thoroughfare" has been established, whether by walking pathway, game trail, or bike riding, it is legal to continue using it, but you can't modify it, ie, maintenance.
    If that's true, wouldn't it be illegal for FS to close it using modifications such as downing trees?
    One would think. But logging companies apparently have lots of political pull with the land managers of the Boise National Forest.

  4. #6479
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,920
    Quote Originally Posted by Roxtar View Post
    Curious about the laws regarding this.
    As I understand, once a "thoroughfare" has been established, whether by walking pathway, game trail, or bike riding, it is legal to continue using it, but you can't modify it, ie, maintenance.
    If that's true, wouldn't it be illegal for FS to close it using modifications such as downing trees?
    Generally speaking, on forest service land there are system trails, and non-system trails. System trails have been adopted by the forest service as official trails, and the forest service maintains them (although sometimes that maintenance is effectively non-existent, usually due to budgetary restraints). If they want to decommission a system trail (or make any other large changes to it, including what users are allowed on it), there's a public process and some level of environmental review.

    Non-system trails could be anything from an old trail that never got adopted into the system to a new rogue trail that some bikes put in, to a trail that developed from use over the years. None of those enjoy any sort of protection. You can legally use them in the same way you can legally walk aimlessly through the forest, but you can't maintain them (just as you can't legally cut down random trees in the forest). If you want to clear deadfall off them, you can sort of skirt the rules by purchasing a permit to cut firewood. Whether that will actually get you out of any trouble kinda depends on who catches you and whether they feel like being an asshole.

    But to your question at the end, the Forest Service is the land manager. They can definitely decommission a non-system trail if they want to. And they can definitely hire a contractor (like a logging company) to do that work for them. Locally, if a non-system trail is going to be decommissioned, they usually either get one of the fire crews to do it in the off season as a training exercise, or they get a logging company to do it, usually as part of a larger logging operation in the vicinity. There's not much to be done about that other than pleading with the district ranger to not do it, and maybe argue that the trail should be brought into the system as an official trail. In my experience, those arguments don't work very often, but occasionally if you can show that a trail is popular and worthwhile, and the FS doesn't feel like it's an environmental catastrophe, and there's someone in the FS office that thinks the trail is cool, it's possible to get it legalized or at least not shut down.

  5. #6480
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Unsustainable rogue MTB trails can sometimes be the leverage needed for a land manager to agree to entertain new sustainable system MTB trail proposals! Of course usually only if someone else agrees to pay to build and maintain them …
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  6. #6481
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,789
    A local crotchety old fuck e biker has taken it upon himself to remove <1 foot tall log drops that don't have a ride around on one of the local non sanctioned trails.

    They've already been rebuilt and I know some of his buddies have told him to knock that shit off. Hopefully it was a one time thing and he doesn't keep doing that.

  7. #6482
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,266
    Quote Originally Posted by John_B View Post
    A local crotchety old fuck e biker has taken it upon himself to remove <1 foot tall log drops that don't have a ride around on one of the local non sanctioned trails.

    They've already been rebuilt and I know some of his buddies have told him to knock that shit off. Hopefully it was a one time thing and he doesn't keep doing that.
    Time to take him out behind the wood shed.

  8. #6483
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    2,789
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Time to take him out behind the wood shed.
    Yup. He's a family friend of my wife so if this keeps up we will have a talk.

  9. #6484
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Hand him an avalanche shovel, and tell him it’s for the moguls at your local hill.
    I’m guessing the sarcasm will be lost on him, however.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  10. #6485
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    2,781
    Quote Originally Posted by Dee Hubbs View Post
    Do you mean USB-C female on the bike, or are you referring to the end of the plug in cable? a proprietary female plug on the bike with a male USB-C charging cable (instead of USB-A)?
    The end of the plug on the rear derailleur. It just goes to regular USB. Could have been a USB c like a phone.
    I <heart> hot tele-moms

  11. #6486
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,673
    The new Stumpy... electronic drivetrain only, proprietary shock, and $6500 for a GX build with pretty average components. No thanks.

  12. #6487
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,920
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    The new Stumpy... electronic drivetrain only, proprietary shock, and $6500 for a GX build with pretty average components. No thanks.
    Yup. I'll be pretty annoyed if mechanical drivetrains get forced into obsolescence by frame manufacturers.

  13. #6488
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    slc
    Posts
    19,215
    This goes way beyond the end of mechanical drivetrains. I won't be surprised if 5 years from now they only make ebikes except for niche stuff like XC/DH race bikes, DJs, etc.

  14. #6489
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    This goes way beyond the end of mechanical drivetrains. I won't be surprised if 5 years from now they only make ebikes except for niche stuff like XC/DH race bikes, DJs, etc.
    then we can all be the antichrist
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  15. #6490
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SLC burbs
    Posts
    4,429
    Quote Originally Posted by Dantheman View Post
    This goes way beyond the end of mechanical drivetrains. I won't be surprised if 5 years from now they only make ebikes except for niche stuff like XC/DH race bikes, DJs, etc.
    I was chatting with a buddy back in France who owns a ski/bike shop and is a big Scott retailer. He said more than 90% of the bike he sells are mopeds these days. I was out hiking 3 or 4 days and didn't see a regular bike out, everything had a motor. The area is quite conducive to ebikes since the vast majority of the uphills are heinous dirt roads used for ski resort access but it was a bit of a jarring sight for me. I spent 15 years pedaling that shit...

    Re: new Stumpy, it looked appealing at first, 160/145 could be an ideal Wasatch bike, and no headset cable routing! The proprietary shock was strike #1 (I guess it can be swapped for any 210x55 but that's just more $$$) but no mechanical drivetrain is the death knell for sure. It could make sense on the S-work models given the price but give us peasants the option to run cables on the semi-affordable models...
    "Your wife being mad is temporary, but pow turns do not get unmade" - mallwalker the wise

  16. #6491
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    2,633
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Yup. I'll be pretty annoyed if mechanical drivetrains get forced into obsolescence by frame manufacturers.
    The process has been underway on the road side for almost 10 years. Pretty common for a top end frame to be electronic only but cables aren't obsolete yet.

  17. #6492
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    1,015
    Quote Originally Posted by Boissal View Post

    Re: new Stumpy, it looked appealing at first, 160/145 could be an ideal Wasatch bike, and no headset cable routing! The proprietary shock was strike #1 (I guess it can be swapped for any 210x55 but that's just more $$$) but no mechanical drivetrain is the death knell for sure. It could make sense on the S-work models given the price but give us peasants the option to run cables on the semi-affordable models...
    what is proprietary about the Stumpy shock? is it some special leverage curve that only works with braingenie? strange they are offering it with a ttx coil but at 8.5K it must be a shop pro only price strategy.

    interested about this one being stiffer than the Stevo. other than stack, my only real complaint on the current gen. i got the comp model when it came out for 4K. prob first and last time paying full retail for a bike.
    bumps are for poor people

  18. #6493
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    cow hampshire
    Posts
    9,361
    Tennis elbow and I don't play tennis! [emoji16]
    Can't really ride...down. Up is fine one armed but down is too sketchy for me. This stupid injury has lingered forever now and it's gotten worse. I'm an idiot for not dealing with it properly from the start. It is an odd one where it really doesn't slow you down, so idiots like me keep going. Faak

  19. #6494
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    northern BC
    Posts
    33,932
    tennis elbow injuries happen to people who don't play tennis but you know that, if it hurts on the inside its tennis and if it hurts on the outside its golfers elbow,

    I've had tennis elbow 5 times from WW kayak paddling really its about the constantly gripping something so it also happens to drywallers and tradesman who swing a hammer. one of those velcro bands around your forearm at the elbow helps

    I havent had tennis elbow in the last 15 yrs since i changed to a paddle with a smaller shaft which is easier to grip

    ime Tennis elbow would go away over the winter when i wasn't paddling
    Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know

  20. #6495
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,920
    Quote Originally Posted by Boissal View Post
    I was chatting with a buddy back in France who owns a ski/bike shop and is a big Scott retailer. He said more than 90% of the bike he sells are mopeds these days. I was out hiking 3 or 4 days and didn't see a regular bike out, everything had a motor. The area is quite conducive to ebikes since the vast majority of the uphills are heinous dirt roads used for ski resort access but it was a bit of a jarring sight for me. I spent 15 years pedaling that shit...

    Re: new Stumpy, it looked appealing at first, 160/145 could be an ideal Wasatch bike, and no headset cable routing! The proprietary shock was strike #1 (I guess it can be swapped for any 210x55 but that's just more $$$) but no mechanical drivetrain is the death knell for sure. It could make sense on the S-work models given the price but give us peasants the option to run cables on the semi-affordable models...
    I think this has got to vary a lot by location. I was riding in France last summer and there were tons of people on regular mountain bikes. Lots of ebikes too, but a large majority of those were tourists on rentals.

    I'm sure ebikes will gain market share, but I'm extraordinarily skeptical of the predictions of the imminent demise of real mountain bikes. Plenty of people still like to get exercise.

    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

  21. #6496
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    2,643
    This probably came up before but wtf is up with fabook feed. All I get is garbage suggested content that I don't care for. Clickbait rage content. I'm in some ski and mountaineering groups to get beta but that never shows up. I get it, they have to push ads. Show me an ad every 3 posts. But enough of the random shit IDGAF.

  22. #6497
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Fish
    Posts
    4,855
    I’m told the new shock will be on other bikes in the future. Also, It’s not that proprietary, it’s just a float with a different air spring. The cable thing is annoying and stupid, but you got to believe there is gonna be alloy options with cables within a year.
    a positive attitude will not solve all of your problems, but it may annoy enough people to make it worth the effort

    Formerly Rludes025

  23. #6498
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    Posts
    559
    Quote Originally Posted by jackstraw View Post
    Tennis elbow and I don't play tennis! [emoji16]
    Get yourself some Theraband Flexbars. I have red, yellow, green, and blue. Pretty much just use green and sometimes blue now. Yellow/red during acute phase. Eccentric twisty exercise that relieves pain and strengthens forearm muscles.

    I used to suffer from mtb-induced seasonal Tennis Elbow. No more. Game changer.

  24. #6499
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    2,795
    I think the new shock is the probably the most compelling part of the new Stumpy. I've struggled on my non-EVO to get a good balance of supple and not blowing through travel. In theory this makes that quite a bit more straightforward and is ultimately standard sized as well. I got to ride a short descent on the new Stumpy 15 this week, though can't say I really got a chance to put it through it's paces as it was setup for someone 50lbs heavier. Doubt I'm in the market, but would be a great all arounder.

    I'm torn on the no cable routing, maybe Shimano is close to releasing their long speculated wireless DI2? I imagine if they come out with an alloy one next year it'll have routing for mechanical.

  25. #6500
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,920
    It seems like every 10 years or so, the industry waffles back and forth on creating the perfect suspension via linkage placement vs. shock fuckery. The last decade had certainly been dominated by linkage placement. Specialized seems to be betting on shock fuckery for the next decade (although specialized has mostly erred towards shock fuckery over linkage placement through the years).

    If history contains any lessons, shock fuckery results in a brief period of bliss, followed by significant frustration, maintenance headaches, and the conclusion that weird shocks are usually tuned for gapers, and they tend to be difficult to tune for competent riders.

    I predict that most decent riders with the new stumpy will ultimately end up mounting a traditional shock on it, and they'll make excuses about how a more linear leverage ratio is actually good because [insert bullshit here].

    Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •