If only there was something we could do...

[leroy jenkins]

yawn

Yea you've got nothing to offer. Its ok man I'm just here to be a smug asshole too. I'm at least trying to make it sort of fun though ya know?

[bennymac]

What exactly is it that prevents this? Be specific. Criticize behavior, not like, vibe or something. if you criticize someone's vibe, all you're really saying is waaah I don't like you, and really, thats no ones business but your own. An adult does not suffer the delusion others care who they like or especially that their personal likes or dislikes of a person are very relevant to any discussion. Keeping it strictly to behavior empowers the one doing the critiquing, being more grounded in fact and less just generally being whiny.


Yes anyone who disagrees with you is just a narcissist who can't admit they're wrong and clearly can't see just how special of a snowflake you are that you have everything all figured out to the point there is only one viewpoint that could possibly have any validity because the world is not a place of nuance, but one where only you and people just like you are sane. Yep and i'm the narcissist. You know who calls other people out for being a narc the most often? Covert narcs, Because they can't conceptualize of any reason for anyone to do anything other than ego, and can't recognize people outside themselves as individuals separate from themselves. This is classic. you guys are beautiful I love you.

Funny thing is, i have acknowledged many times even in this thread there is validity to the things people who disagree with me say. I also just disagree about other things. I don't need to try to paint people as crazy just so I don't have to look at their arguments. Really, you guys hardly even have any arguments. Mostly its just fat meadow skipper sucking farts directly out of everyones ass.

This single thread is honestly one of the wackiest corners of the interwebs. Its great. You guys are nuts I fucking love you. I know so many liberals and not a single one is rabidly pro disarmament like you clowns think all liberals are. You nuts are alone on this.

Wrong

[Conundrum]

Your absurd hyperbole of arming children isn't something even the most rabid pro gun people say. You think it’s satire but it’s just stupid. You should be embarrassed.

The second amendment doesn’t define age. Is it fair to say that even the most rabid pro gun people are willing to have some form of gun control even if it means they are abiding to it when 2a doesn’t call for it?

Hey man, I’m on your side here. I own guns. Seems to be a slippery slope to have any type of gun control not called for in 2a. I told you, you’ve shifted my opinions with your insights and opinions. We’re fighting a long game and certain rights shall not be infringed.

[leroy jenkins]

The second amendment doesn’t define age. Is it fair to say that even the most rabid pro gun people are willing to have some form of gun control even if it means they are abiding to it when 2a doesn’t call for it?

Hey man, I’m on your side here. I own guns. Seems to be a slippery slope to have any type of gun control not called for in 2a. I told you, you’ve shifted my opinions with your insights and opinions. We’re fighting a long game and certain rights shall not be infringed.

It doesnt have to be the 2a. Rights in general apply to adults. Children dont have the right to vote,and although I disagree with it, children do not have the right to due process either.

You're incapable fo arguing honestly. You think this is because of who you're debating but it has everything to do with you.

[leroy jenkins]

Wrong

lol how so genious?

[Ted Striker]

lol how so genious?

Misspelling genius is not a good look.

[Conundrum]

You’ll only have people debate you honestly when you do the same. You accuse me a cherry picking one year. I post 20 years of data that is not cherry picking and you are crickets. Cool. Keep being you brother. The world needs freedom fighters.

[skaredshtles]

Misspelling genius is not a good look.

He's playing 5D checkers, man!

CHECKMATE!!

[Cisco Kid]

That kid wouldn't last 30 minutes on a HS debate team. I think he hits all 26.

26 Common Logical Fallacies
https://www.indeed.com/career-advice...ical-fallacies

[bennymac]

lol how so genious?

😂 sig worthy

[leroy jenkins]

You’ll only have people debate you honestly when you do the same. You accuse me a cherry picking one year. I post 20 years of data that is not cherry picking and you are crickets. Cool. Keep being you brother. The world needs freedom fighters.

if you're going to post a link as if it proves something, paraphrase just what you're saying it proves, or eelse I'm not going to bother reading it. Do that, and i'll read it. If you dont, youre expecting me to figure out what your argument is and make ti for you just so I can rebut it. Thats stupid.


I debated you clowns honestly many times. You aren't capab.le fo it. So now I have decided, the best thing I can do to support gun rights, is just troll and further radicalize you crazy nuts. You're already all as anti gun as you can get, but if you contrinue to get further out on that limb, the moderates of the country will just perceive you all as increasingly crazy, as they always do when they wander into this thread.

[leroy jenkins]

Misspelling genius is not a good look.

Ehhh, acting like a typo means anythign isn't a good look either. Its typically the lowest level of debate, when you have nothign else to ogffer, attack grammar.

[leroy jenkins]

That kid wouldn't last 30 minutes on a HS debate team. I think he hits all 26.

26 Common Logical Fallacies
https://www.indeed.com/career-advice...ical-fallacies

Yet you're not capable of articulating how? Just not smart enough? Go through them, come on, tear me appart. But you can't. hell maybe someone could roast me, but you cant you're just not smart enough.

Prove me wrong. ITs going to just be you strawmanning everything.

By the way your wife is a stupid fat ugly diseased whore.

[leroy jenkins]

�� sig worthy

Go for it. Give in to your obsession with me.

But can you tell me how I'm wrong? Are you capable?

[Conundrum]

if you're going to post a link as if it proves something, paraphrase just what you're saying it proves, or eelse I'm not going to bother reading it. Do that, and i'll read it. If you dont, youre expecting me to figure out what your argument is and make ti for you just so I can rebut it. Thats stupid.

Cherry picking? It's been in the top three causes of death for at least the last 20 years. Maybe more.

https://www.kff.org/mental-health/is...eer-countries/

You say firearms are the most efficient means of self defense. I say that if you are a member of a demographic that the top three causes of death is firearms, you should have the option to defend yourself with a firearm because I'm open minded and following what you say. You say I'm cherry picking data. I then provide 20 years of data showing that it's not a cherry picked number. Keep up.

Thats stupid.

You're stupid.

[m2711c]

havin’ a conversation with le roy be like…







le fact.

[Cisco Kid]

No human is able to convince him that he is wrong. Ever. Begs the question. Why is he so far up on the spectrum of OCD that he lives on TGR for hours every day only to "debate"? Nature or Nurture?

[m2711c]

dude don’t ski…

[leroy jenkins]

You say firearms are the most efficient means of self defense. I say that if you are a member of a demographic that the top three causes of death is firearms, you should have the option to defend yourself with a firearm because I'm open minded and following what you say. You say I'm cherry picking data. I then provide 20 years of data showing that it's not a cherry picked number. Keep up.



You're stupid.

What are you saying the data you're providing shows? Say that and I'
ll look atit.

[leroy jenkins]

dude don’t ski…

Not today. Mountain biking today. Or maybe go for a quick flight if the wind stays calm. Skied the last three days, bell to bell. Thanks for caring.

[leroy jenkins]

No human is able to convince him that he is wrong. Ever. Begs the question. Why is he so far up on the spectrum of OCD that he lives on TGR for hours every day only to "debate"? Nature or Nurture?

I've been wrong about many things, but I'm totally right that your wife is a dumb diseased whore. That is objective fact as we all kjnow.

If you're talking about guns, I admit there areother viewpoints to my own that have validity. I also think my viewpoint has validity. You're some kind manchild who can't conceive of the world in any other way than either right or not and you cannot conceive of any viewpoint but your own having any validity whatsoever.

I weigh the pros and cons of guns. You guys just live in denial that there can possibly be any pros. Its delusional. You don't have to do that. You can admit a viewpoint has validity, and also disagree with it. You don't have to distort reality. I mean I guess you do cus of all the cognitive dissonance you get from living in denial that your wifes cunt is full of puss and viruses.

[leroy jenkins]

You say firearms are the most efficient means of self defense. I say that if you are a member of a demographic that the top three causes of death is firearms, you should have the option to defend yourself with a firearm because I'm open minded and following what you say. You say I'm cherry picking data. I then provide 20 years of data showing that it's not a cherry picked number. Keep up.



You're stupid.

The 20 years ofg data doesn't really back up your viewpoint. It shows a slight rise in firearms deaths, in the last couple years, with declines in all other causes. t shows it as pretty low for the 20 years previous.

CDan you actually say what you're claiming the data says, so I can tell you how you're wrong?

[Cisco Kid]

Well. Your mother wears army boots
and you're a poopie head.

[bennymac]

Go for it. Give in to your obsession with me.

But can you tell me how I'm wrong? Are you capable?

Talk about the lowest level of debate = accuse the other person of being obsessed with you LOL. Proof you don’t have anything better to counter with. Pure “genious” on your part. It’s as high quality a deflection as attacking someone else’s wife - proof you ain’t got shit and are just lashing out in desperation. Pathetic. Sad.

You: majority of Americans don’t want gun control

Counter: here is a poll saying you’re wrong

You: oh a poll?! That’s shitty evidence. I need hard data. Brain scans that show what people really think?

Truth is you discount and dismiss any data that doesn’t support your narrative. You, as a special snowflake entitled narcissist, feel you can wave away data with your hand by saying shit like “oh that data? It’s corrupted.”

And any and every time someone calls you out on your bullshit you flip it around and demand (there’s that special entitlement again) they prove you wrong (instead of you proving you’re right). And the circle of life continues - someone eventually has enough patience to prove it and you revert back to oh that data doesn’t count for reasons.

Let’s hear some more of that entitlement…

Or just spin the wheel of logical fallacies and go with whatever comes up…

[leroy jenkins]

Talk about the lowest level of debate = accuse the other person of being obsessed with you LOL. Proof you don’t have anything better to counter with. Pure “genious” on your part. It’s as high quality a deflection as attacking someone else’s wife - proof you ain’t got shit and are just lashing out in desperation. Pathetic. Sad.

You: majority of Americans don’t want gun control

Counter: here is a poll saying you’re wrong

You: oh a poll?! That’s shitty evidence. I need hard data. Brain scans that show what people really think?

Truth is you discount and dismiss any data that doesn’t support your narrative. You, as a special snowflake entitled narcissist, feel you can wave away data with your hand by saying shit like “oh that data? It’s corrupted.”

And any and every time someone calls you out on your bullshit you flip it around and demand (there’s that special entitlement again) they prove you wrong (instead of you proving you’re right). And the circle of life continues - someone eventually has enough patience to prove it and you revert back to oh that data doesn’t count for reasons.

Let’s hear some more of that entitlement…

Or just spin the wheel of logical fallacies and go with whatever comes up…

ye ai ignored his poll. You guys ignore every actual point I or ayone else make or that htere is any validity to any counter argument whatsoever, or that guns have ever served any good purpose whatsoever. Connundrum recently made the analogy to slavery, hahaa. You all completly ignore any counter point such as lives saved by guns or anything. A bunchof my previous replies in this thread were just calling out obvious gaslighitng. It makes more sense to ignore a poll, which can be influeced easily and often contradict each other, than it is to deny the fundamental nature of realityt hat guns do sometimes save innocent lives. You could weigh the pros and cons and still come out anti gun, but instead you all need to distort reality. Which is why now I'm just going to troll you.

but iff you really want to attempt being seriuos, is there any point you or anyone else in here would stop supporting gun control? Like if all semi autos were banned? Would you then say enough isenough? Or would it just always be support for more gun control?

And theres no entitlement, I parsed connundrums data as best I could, it just doesn't say what he implied it does. And he won't come out and just plainly say what he thinks it proves because it doesn't prove any point of his and he's just way too fucking dumb to do it.

I mean, I may not be the smartest, but you guys all have the iq of fucking cinderblocks.