Check Out Our Shop
Page 64 of 104 FirstFirst ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... LastLast
Results 1,576 to 1,600 of 2582

Thread: Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

  1. #1576
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    Haven't tried the comps but I will say the AM R99 is no slouch. I can hit the gas pedal occasionally and have been quite happy on the AM R99s. To the point that I don't know if I'd really like the comps any more. And late in the day after some pocket beers, I haven't felt like the skis are trying to make me pay for my transgressions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    Well, I'm not allowed to delete this post, but, I can say, go fuck yourselves, everybody!

  2. #1577
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,468
    Quote Originally Posted by Upinsmoke View Post
    Can confirm my 182 r87comps are cold dead hands skis for me. It’s a shame they are an endangered species
    Excellent.

    Will be out on mine soon.

  3. #1578
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,468
    Anyone have time on both the R99comp and Kastle MX98 that compare/contrast?

  4. #1579
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,717
    Quote Originally Posted by TAFKALVS View Post
    I want to see a graph with r99 comp values, I bet it just jumped with that announcement
    Have you seen the value graph on limited run Porsche 911s? It’ll be just like that.
    Too bad it’s such a struggle for MO - I’m sorry for the others who are interested. Going to baby mine now..

  5. #1580
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    shadow of HS butte
    Posts
    6,749

    Bringing Back The Best: Lotii And Other Assorted Love Songs

    The R99 comps are just an insanely well balanced ski. The flex profile, dampness, and shape all complement each other very well. They might be the perfect JHMR daily driver between storms.

    Had them out this past weekend and they just kill it everywhere. Maching GS turns down skied out groomers with piles of crud, check. Destroying funky mank, a breeze. Cold chalk, love it. They ski bumps well too. Maybe I’m one of the crazies for not detuning, but I’ve had no issues with hooking the tips either.

    If another production run popped up I’d snap up a couple pairs without hesitation.



    What was the shortest length the 87/99 AMs came in? 182? Want to get my fiancé on board but that may be a touch long for a true DD for her.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  6. #1581
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,510
    Hopping in on the first batch was clutch, that’s for sure. Really disappointed Blossom wasn’t easier for MO to work with. It will definitely make me more aware of the terrain coverage I take them into now.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  7. #1582
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Conundrum View Post
    Haven't tried the comps but I will say the AM R99 is no slouch. I can hit the gas pedal occasionally and have been quite happy on the AM R99s. To the point that I don't know if I'd really like the comps any more. And late in the day after some pocket beers, I haven't felt like the skis are trying to make me pay for my transgressions.
    I have skied with the beginner GF a few days on my Comps this year. They ski slow so easily, really enjoyable actually. They don’t need mach schnell at all times, though they do excel there.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #1583
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    247
    The shortest 87 was 175cm
    shortest 99 was 180cm

  9. #1584
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,717
    Quote Originally Posted by pfluffenmeister View Post
    Anyone have time on both the R99comp and Kastle MX98 that compare/contrast?
    I had the latest gen MX98 and enjoyed them but just sold because the R99 does it all better. The R99 dampness, smoothness, and truck factor are superior. This of course was a toned down MX98 so I’m not making claims on the beloved generation.

  10. #1585
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,755
    Okay so I just spent the day on the R99 AM and had a phenomenal time. Initially after receiving the ski I was a bit nervous, especially today when I went from the R87 175 to the 99 188. Once on snow it was just awesome. It was a wet, heavy sierra cement kind of day and the skis just stayed planted and felt so damp like nothing I have ridden. I was able to just bust through everything rather than skiing with a more dynamic style that I typically do in that type of snow.

    The tune really blew me away. It was so easy to "tokyo drift" around yet still easily get on edge and carve. I can't really describe it any other way. It makes me upset that most of the shop guys I have spoken with have typically really looked down upon that tune.
    Shared in lamentation of raceroom skis

  11. #1586
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,843
    I don't know where this should live as there isn't a swallowtail 120 thread, but i'm looking for guidance on mount point for the 187 FR120s. I'm 5'10", 155lbs before any gear, ski faster than most and am a very directional skier who has typically gotten along very well with more fall line skis (like the FL113s) mounted on or slightly back from the recommended line. 307 bsl in dobermans if it matters. Standing on the 86.25cm from the tail mount line feels forward to me, but if mounting back from recommended is frowned upon for this ski i'm willing to give it a try. Intended use case for these skis is a storm day/low viz/limited terrain pow ski that won't make me go back to the car to switch skis out as things get cut up like a 132 or 138 would. Happy to send you a pm about this if that is easier but I figured others may have questions on the mount as well.

    Also, these things are gorgeous. The finish on them is world class and the construction of the swallowtail with the aluminum insert is something that was lacking on igneous and DB swallowtails in the past.
    Three fundamentals of every extreme skier, total disregard for personal saftey, amphetamines, and lots and lots of malt liquor......-jack handy

  12. #1587
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    Similar boat but heavier by 50 lbs. MO suggested -2 from recommended line for me. I haven’t gotten the skis yet so TBD

  13. #1588
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    247
    I’m sure Marshal will start a dedicated thread for the swallowtails eventually.
    the tail wrap is huge for durability, something both the Tabla Rasa and Sanouk struggled with. I think you’ll be ok to go back a cm or 2, the point of the tail is to sink in pow. Can’t wait for mine to show up, haven’t been this excited for a new pair of skis ever!

  14. #1589
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    SLC
    Posts
    1,043
    Mounted the BC version at -7cm and I’m a pretty neutral skier, not super aggressive. Only two days in mixed conditions and I’m happy with the mount point, which makes me think going back 1 or 2 for your style might be the best bet.

  15. #1590
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    panhandle locdog
    Posts
    8,159
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6824.JPG 
Views:	292 
Size:	177.7 KB 
ID:	485179Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6825.JPG 
Views:	283 
Size:	204.2 KB 
ID:	485180

    Stoked!!

  16. #1591
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Posts
    283
    Oh my!

  17. #1592
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    2,717
    [emoji91][emoji91][emoji91][emoji1598]

  18. #1593
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    247
    Just got mine too! Exciting stuff. Going to mount them tonight

  19. #1594
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    744
    Gorgeous

    Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

  20. #1595
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    247
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	77FA8435-8A26-4B3D-8CF3-99F31BC1E6FE.jpg 
Views:	196 
Size:	676.5 KB 
ID:	485226

  21. #1596
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    247
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4E3D68A4-A20D-457C-B567-5C1229A96D0A.jpg 
Views:	184 
Size:	674.5 KB 
ID:	485227

  22. #1597
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    SW CO
    Posts
    247
    187cm r120
    186cm fr110

  23. #1598
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Southside of heaven
    Posts
    3,260
    Quote Originally Posted by TAFKALVS View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6824.JPG 
Views:	292 
Size:	177.7 KB 
ID:	485179Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_6825.JPG 
Views:	283 
Size:	204.2 KB 
ID:	485180

    Stoked!!
    which flavor are these?

  24. #1599
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,468
    Quote Originally Posted by GBB View Post
    which flavor are these?
    They look like the R120ST.
    Which I have awaiting a mount as well.

    Seeking Blue Tomato P15s (white/purple).

  25. #1600
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    37N 122W
    Posts
    666
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_2390.JPG 
Views:	141 
Size:	107.3 KB 
ID:	485272

    A more beautiful ski I do not think I’ve seen.

    So psyched to get these mounted up.

    Big shout out to MO for the incredible customer service and continuous advice and feedback to get you dialed. This is how I want to acquire skis.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    "Kids today, all they talk about is big air. I say, stay on the mountain, that's where the action is. If you want big air, pull my finger." ~Smooth Johnson~

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •