Got some 186 FR110 ramblings if you're interested, I don't have a TGR account but have been reading the Gymkhana thread there.
Why I purchased this ski: During the past 2 seasons I skied the 192 M-Free 108 most of the time. I love the M-Free for how stable it is while being loose and easy to pivot for its size - it's the first ski I've been on that allows me to enjoy almost all conditions. However, it's a bit cumbersome in tight spots, which makes tight turns in no fall zones more nerve-wracking than I'd like. I tried sizing down to the 182 M-Free 108 but that sacrificed too much stability for me, the ski would wash out on high speed turns and jump turns. So I was looking for something similar to the M-Free - stable and loose but less cumbersome for softish snow use in tight, steep, technical terrain. Most of my days are at Bridger Bowl, with Big Sky and Altabird in second place. Shredeagle mentioned Bridger on the first page of the Gymkhana thread and the wheels started turning. I'm not sure if you've skied the ridge at Bridger before, but primary use case I envisioned for this ski was chutes with choke points of 2-3 feet/mandatory air before having to scrub speed above another choke/mandatory air. I'm 6'1, 190lbs and have never skied reverse camber before. 329 BSL, mounted at -7cm.
On to the ski - my favorite thing about the FR110 is that for the first time, I have complete confidence that my skis will go exactly where I want them to go. It's like magic. I just scope out my line, envision myself following it, and it happens. No tails washing out, no edges catching early, no missing the turn because I miscalculated speed, no going over the handlebars if I land in snow that's too deep, no tails propelling me to Valhalla if I get knocked backseat. It's like easy mode. It's perfect for the reason I bought it. What really caught my eye in the description was "drifting out of 55mph straight lines," and it's amazing how maneuverable these are while also providing very good stability.
Unexpected benefits:
- I haven't gotten to ride the FR110 in any really deep conditions yet but had a few runs on 10-12 inches of untracked and this is a dream in powder. I never seemed to enjoy powder in trees as much as other people because I couldn't get my tails to release predictably (probably because I ski more centered in trees), but those days are gone. It's insane to me how loose and maneuverable these are in soft snow, extremely confidence-inspiring.
- Halfway down the mountain yesterday the soft conditions turned wet and heavy and it started raining. This is my all-time least favorite type of snow, and a big reason why I moved to Montana instead of further West. But on this ski I didn't hate it!
- I got knocked backseat after catching some unexpected air and was surprised to find I was still in control and could make turns! I don't think I've ever felt in control while backseat, this was a crazy feeling.
- Haven't skied these on firm groomers yet but on soft groomers they carve way better than expected. The "factory tune" is awesome. They aren't engaging, snappy carvers (obviously not meant to be with their turn radius) but just putting them on edge and laying trenches works much better than I imagined.
I saw someone in the Gymkhana thread asking about a comparison to the 192 M-Free 108. I haven't A/B'd the two skis yet, but here are some initial thoughts:
192 M-Free 108:
More stable, especially at speed.
Better edge hold.
Better overall carver due to edge hold on firm.
186 FR110:
More predictable, easier to handle in tight spots.
Slightly looser on groomers, much looser in powder.
Better float.
More forgiving if you get backseat (the M-Free is not particularly punishing backseat, but the FR110 is on a whole other level)
Wider range of turn shapes on groomers.
Better in weird snow.
More manageable in the air.
Basically, the M-Free is capable of bombing groomers at 60mph with minimal input, and I don't think I'd be comfortable doing that on the FR110. One of my favorite things to do on the M-Free is straightline moguls like Candide in this video from 1:02 to 1:08: (
https://youtu.be/p-mZTR1glq4?si=5-eDttofLVMw_VYz&t=62). This is not why I bought the FR110, but I don't think it's suited for this kind of skiing. It would be suited for popping off and gapping the moguls though - this ski feels great in the air. I haven't skied the FR110 in really firm conditions yet, but I imagine the M-Free would perform better in firm - I had no problems using the M-Free as a one-ski quiver for 90% of the abnormally dry 21-22 season. I think you mentioned that the FR110 is not suitable as a one-ski quiver and I'd agree with that (unless maybe you only ski Alta/Targhee/Alyeska/Japan).
I'd assume that most of the above differences would hold true for the 193 FR110, except stability would be improved, float would be even better, and they'd be harder to handle in tight spots. If my FR110 goal was to ski more open terrain like Mineral Basin, I'd probably want the 193. And I wonder if I'd actually like the 193 FR110 in those scenarios more than my less-loose M-Free, or if the M-Free's stability at speed and suspension through chop would make it come out ahead.
Some other tradeoffs that come to mind:
Took a couple hours to learn optimal stance and balance points.
Can feel like a long skiblade on groomers if your balance is off.
Not a true charger that dampens out everything under your feet (at least in the 186).
TLDR: Skiing the FR110 in tight, steep, technical terrain is like skiing on easy mode. Impeccably predictable. Floats better than any sub-125 ski I've been on. Loose feeling in deep snow is the most fun I've ever had in powder. Less stable than similarly long/heavy skis. Probably my favorite steep ski of all time, and will be my favorite powder ski until I get on a wider reverse camber ski!
Bookmarks