Check Out Our Shop
Page 512 of 601 FirstFirst ... 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 ... LastLast
Results 12,776 to 12,800 of 15016

Thread: Ask the experts

  1. #12776
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Under the bridge, down by the river
    Posts
    4,881
    Is changing to regular boost just an endcap/redish?

  2. #12777
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction Co
    Posts
    1,092
    From superboost hubs going to boost?

    No. Can’t be done.

    You can take some boost wheels to superboost but not the other way.

    Quote Originally Posted by CantDog View Post
    Is changing to regular boost just an endcap/redish?

  3. #12778
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,781
    still trying to wrap my brain around the high cost i paid for 32 i9 spokes- when i got thinking - could i have just used sapim straight pull strokes instead? or any other equivalent much cheaper straight pull spoke?
    Do I detect a lot of anger flowing around this place? Kind of like a pubescent volatility, some angst, a lot of I'm-sixteen-and-angry-at-my-father syndrome?

    fuck that noise.

    gmen.

  4. #12779
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SLCizzy
    Posts
    3,679
    Quote Originally Posted by volklpowdermaniac View Post
    still trying to wrap my brain around the high cost i paid for 32 i9 spokes- when i got thinking - could i have just used sapim straight pull strokes instead? or any other equivalent much cheaper straight pull spoke?
    What wheelset was it? Are they the alloy spokes on a I9system wheel that thread into the hub? If so, that’s your only choice afaik.
    They build some wheels with regular spokes, those are conventional spoke/nipple construction


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  5. #12780
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,781
    Quote Originally Posted by joetron View Post
    What wheelset was it? Are they the alloy spokes on a I9system wheel that thread into the hub? If so, that’s your only choice afaik.
    They build some wheels with regular spokes, those are conventional spoke/nipple construction


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    yep. hydra with bc360 wheel. :/
    Do I detect a lot of anger flowing around this place? Kind of like a pubescent volatility, some angst, a lot of I'm-sixteen-and-angry-at-my-father syndrome?

    fuck that noise.

    gmen.

  6. #12781
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BC to CO
    Posts
    5,119
    Quote Originally Posted by CantDog View Post
    Is changing to regular boost just an endcap/redish?
    No, but you could (or have a shop) relace to a boost hub.

    Lacing in a new 350 boost hub would transfer over directly.
    The spoke calcs are identical on NDS and <1mm shorter on the drive side.
    Reuse spokes and nipples.
    Cost of new hub.
    Cost of lace, true, tape.
    Sell super boost hub.

  7. #12782
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    129
    Did a service on my Float DPS rear shock a few weeks ago. It sits horizontal on the bike. I'm noticing a tiny bit of float fluid seeping out the bottom of the threaded interface between the air sleeve and the eyelet cap. Not sure if its just residual fluid that was in the threads or a sign of something else wrong. Any ideas? It seems to be holding pressure fine and appears to be tightened all the way down.

  8. #12783
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tahoe-ish
    Posts
    3,357
    This thread seems like the place to put this. It's real engineering innovation in cycling!

    TLDR: they moved the freehub mechanism to the brake disc side, allowing it to be larger. This also means that the bearings are farther outboard on the (huge diameter) axle, so that there is no bending of the axle. Stiffer hub=longer lasting bearings & fewer broken rear axles.

    https://www.k-o-m.co.uk/xeno-hub

    Peak Torque did a big, detailed breakdown.
    https://youtu.be/qO6DUSKhbRU?si=dIqx-kYLkqStxLJH
    ride bikes, climb, ski, travel, cook, work to fund former, repeat.

  9. #12784
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,926
    That looks really cool. Seems like a good, logical design, and I'm impressed they kept the weight as low as they did. I suspect the proprietary disc brake is going to limit it's success somewhat though.

  10. #12785
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tahoe-ish
    Posts
    3,357
    I was impressed. PT says their discs are super high quality and should be very long lasting, but it would certainly be wise for the early adopters to grab a spare. The cost is pretty nuts, but for those who want the latest and/or who break axles often, it's probably worth it.
    ride bikes, climb, ski, travel, cook, work to fund former, repeat.

  11. #12786
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    BC to CO
    Posts
    5,119
    Quote Originally Posted by climberevan View Post
    The cost is pretty nuts, but for those who want the latest and/or who break axles often, it's probably worth it.
    Is the price really that nuts? It’s list for £550, so basically $700 USD for a rear hub and a disc.

    Look at top of the line hubs:
    $718 DT 180 (ceramic not fair comparison)
    $588 Chris King
    $518 Dt 240
    $500 Onyx
    $485 Onyx Vesper
    $475 I9 Hydra
    Add another $100 for top of the line 180m rotor.

  12. #12787
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,922
    Scott takes down a 127 million loan. Why? Is this a survival / debt service life line, or a let’s buy out competitors in a soft market play? I read the press release and am trying to connect the dots.

  13. #12788
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada1 View Post
    Scott takes down a 127 million loan. Why? Is this a survival / debt service life line, or a let’s buy out competitors in a soft market play? I read the press release and am trying to connect the dots.
    I was wondering the same thing. The loan is only for a year, so that would maybe imply that it's more of a short term survival thing? If they were buying up competitors or making some sort of expansion move, there's probably not any immediate financial gains associated with that, so I would think the loan would have been something with a longer term.

  14. #12789
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    I was wondering the same thing. The loan is only for a year, so that would maybe imply that it's more of a short term survival thing? If they were buying up competitors or making some sort of expansion move, there's probably not any immediate financial gains associated with that, so I would think the loan would have been something with a longer term.
    It's a short term loan for liquidity

    "In a filing with South Korean financial regulators, Youngone said it made the investment in the form of a 4.6% loan at the end of 2023. "SCOTT SPORTS SA plans to use this money loan for the company's working capital, etc., and will appoint a person designated by the company as the Financial Controller to manage and supervise the process," the filing said"

  15. #12790
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hell Track
    Posts
    14,926
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    It's a short term loan for liquidity

    "In a filing with South Korean financial regulators, Youngone said it made the investment in the form of a 4.6% loan at the end of 2023. "SCOTT SPORTS SA plans to use this money loan for the company's working capital, etc., and will appoint a person designated by the company as the Financial Controller to manage and supervise the process," the filing said"
    Is your interpretation of that that they're broke(ish) and need to make sure they make payroll, or that they're taking that loan so that they can free up other money for some other project?

  16. #12791
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by toast2266 View Post
    Is your interpretation of that that they're broke(ish) and need to make sure they make payroll, or that they're taking that loan so that they can free up other money for some other project?
    Working capital technically is for short term input and output. In GAAP terms its for less than one year duration. A loan stated as for WC would be for short term payables like salary, trade debt, lease payments etc. If it had been said.... general course of business, pursue strategic opportunities then that's more of a code word for other projects.

    So it's probably some sort of short term (ie one year) bridge loan backstop

  17. #12792
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    I’m not saying the following to start rumors as I have no involvement. Companies that borrow like this generally are stretched and they have a cash flow problem. They’re probably carrying large ARs and their customers are slow to pay.

  18. #12793
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    North Vancouver/Whistler
    Posts
    14,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Conundrum View Post
    I’m not saying the following to start rumors as I have no involvement. Companies that borrow like this generally are stretched and they have a cash flow problem. They’re probably carrying large ARs and their customers are slow to pay.
    Exactly. Note too the relatively decent interest rate. Note also explicit call out that there's a dedicated financial controller for this. It means there's probably covenants (ie financial ratios Scott has to meet). Could be something like debt/equity this much, AR has to be this much, AP has to be this much, cash has to be this much.

    You can probably assume it's also a relatively friendly lender. So perhaps not terrible for Scott

  19. #12794
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Park City
    Posts
    1,922
    Quote Originally Posted by LeeLau View Post
    Exactly. Note too the relatively decent interest rate. Note also explicit call out that there's a dedicated financial controller for this. It means there's probably covenants (ie financial ratios Scott has to meet). Could be something like debt/equity this much, AR has to be this much, AP has to be this much, cash has to be this much.

    You can probably assume it's also a relatively friendly lender. So perhaps not terrible for Scott
    So, my read is they have to much inventory out to shops that isn't moving and need to take down a loan to make it through. Not confidence inspiring. I'm not in the market for a frameset that has a hard to work on shock and routing through the headset, but I want hem to make it. There is so much of their product around here in Utah. Hope they can survive on the 60% off sales.

  20. #12795
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    I'm a huge fan of wearing the Camelbak Chase Vest for long'ish rides where I don't need to carry a ton - super comfortable and I barely know it's there. Has anyone tried out a larger-capacity running vest for all-day rides where you carry a bunch of stuff with you (tools, jacket, lunch, etc)?

  21. #12796
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tahoe-ish
    Posts
    3,357
    On full day rides when there's no water resupply/stream to filter I use a "5L" Osprey running vest that holds 1.5l of water, a jacket, a big sandwich, and a couple of other snacks. Below that I have 3 jersey pockets that can hold a ton more stuff. The bike has 2 bottle cages, pump on its holder, and 3 other bags for tools, spare tube, more food. Cargo bib shorts hold 2-3 bars on each leg. That's plenty for me to do 12h on the bike, and I'm good with that. No need for a bigger pack....
    ride bikes, climb, ski, travel, cook, work to fund former, repeat.

  22. #12797
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    NorCal coast
    Posts
    2,247
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    I'm a huge fan of wearing the Camelbak Chase Vest for long'ish rides where I don't need to carry a ton - super comfortable and I barely know it's there. Has anyone tried out a larger-capacity running vest for all-day rides where you carry a bunch of stuff with you (tools, jacket, lunch, etc)?
    I've got the Chase and Evoc Hydro Pro 3 - have been considering the larger Hydro Pro 6 to supplement for same reasons you are. The Chase breathes better but the Evoc has dual zippered strap pockets which means stuff doesn't fall out. I like that the 6 appears to spread out the increased volume between both the chest pockets and back, which means it should still retain a lot of the body-hugging that makes these vests so great.

  23. #12798
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Three-O-Three
    Posts
    15,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Andeh View Post
    I've got the Chase and Evoc Hydro Pro 3 - have been considering the larger Hydro Pro 6 to supplement for same reasons you are. The Chase breathes better but the Evoc has dual zippered strap pockets which means stuff doesn't fall out. I like that the 6 appears to spread out the increased volume between both the chest pockets and back, which means it should still retain a lot of the body-hugging that makes these vests so great.
    Hmmm.... I hadn't seen the Evoc pack yet. I may have to give that one a try. With the front pockets for tools and small items, that might be plenty for what I need. The only issue is fitting a small mirrorless camera in the pack.

    I also found this BD vest/pack that seems to be a bit bigger and might fit more of what I need: https://www.blackdiamondequipment.co...15-backpack-1/
    Last edited by smmokan; 01-20-2024 at 01:16 PM.

  24. #12799
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    5,490
    Quote Originally Posted by smmokan View Post
    I'm a huge fan of wearing the Camelbak Chase Vest for long'ish rides where I don't need to carry a ton - super comfortable and I barely know it's there. Has anyone tried out a larger-capacity running vest for all-day rides where you carry a bunch of stuff with you (tools, jacket, lunch, etc)?
    Not sure which one you have but I have the Chase 8 with the 2L bladder and it works really well for me. I find it much more comfortable and stable than a traditional camelback with the waist strap.

  25. #12800
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    3,781
    Bought a brand new Marzocchi z2,140 from jenson in december for my budget HT build.

    probably has 4-5 rides at this point. only thing i've done is added two volume spacers.
    now doesn't seem to hold air super well. fill it to preferred 86 psi. 12 hours later it's at 82, after about 24 around 75-76. post rides seems to shake out that i set it at 86 and by end of ride it's at about 70.

    i retightened the air chamber , tightened the valve core and used soapy water spray to see any leakes but none obvious.

    is it just still breaking in? where else might i be having an issue.

    i tried deflating the whole thing and adding 10-15 at a time equalizing negative chamber with each interval via 4-5 pumps on fork.

    also tried bleeding each leg via zip tie method.

    so far nothing.

    headed for ride now but not super hopeful.

    any ideas?
    Do I detect a lot of anger flowing around this place? Kind of like a pubescent volatility, some angst, a lot of I'm-sixteen-and-angry-at-my-father syndrome?

    fuck that noise.

    gmen.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •