Check Out Our Shop
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 133

Thread: RIP Pacified athletic conference

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    13,605
    Quote Originally Posted by alias_rice View Post
    A combo of greed and pure incompetence from the PAC...
    No, 100% pure incompetence.

    Failure to develop a reasonable revenue sharing arrangement, failure to build value in the member institutions, failure to protect it's most valuable franchises, failure to add Texas/Oklahoma, etc...

    On that last point- The Big 12 was ripe for the picking and the PAC-12 ends up with Colorado! No Texas, no OU, no Nebraska, not even A&M with their alumni network and research facilities.

    I guess Utah more than made up for that.

    Of course some of the member institutions did their fair share to fuck things up- e.g.: Stanford adamantly pushing for equal revenue sharing. That deal is largely why USC and fucla left the conference, and why Texas and Oklahoma declined to join.

    The Pac-12 actually demanded that Texas contribute $15MM annually from its Long Horn Network (an ESPN deal)!

    Think the Pac-12 might be in a better positions had it negotiated a way to allow Texas, OU, Texas Tech and Oklahoma St. join? Adding Texas likely would have likely facilitated a far bigger ESPN deal for the conference in whole.

    The networks want to pay more and more $$$ for access to great product/franchises, and not the mediocre shit-fuck that the Pac-12 evolved into.
    Your dog just ate an avocado!

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,377
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    As a Cal alumni (you too?) with multiple friends whose kids are currently attending and participating in other sports, I assure you this is not the case and all of this mess is screwing things up and they've already been forced to travel much more in recent years as a result. It's only going to get worse. Same deal for Stanford.
    This is the beginning of the end for those sports, every slowly,one at a time. Many will become club teams where they have to self fund.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,857
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    As a Cal alumni (you too?) with multiple friends whose kids are currently attending and participating in other sports, I assure you this is not the case and all of this mess is screwing things up and they've already been forced to travel much more in recent years as a result. It's only going to get worse. Same deal for Stanford.
    For Cal softball, as an example, over half the games last season were non conference. I expect UCLA, as an example, will still be playing Cal, it just won't be a conference game. In Rugby Cal--a frequent national champion and runner up last season--plays in a 4 team conference. 8 out of 38 games were in conference. Cal water polo--champs last 2 seasons--is similar.
    I'm not sure how much the additional traveling has to do with conference realignment. When the UCLA has to travel to Columbus that will be a stretch--certainly not good for so called student athletes.

    Part of what's going on with the Pac 12 is that basically people on the west coast don't care as much about sports in general and college football in general. We went to Cal-Stanford at Stanford one year--Goff vs McCaffery. Plenty of empty seats. Not a lot of noise. Most of the enthusiasm was from the kids staring at each other over the Axe. (Stanford won, Goff threw for a shitload.) If a 'Bama alum had the misfortune of having a kid go to Stanford and decided to catch a game they would be shocked.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    Part of what's going on with the Pac 12 is that basically people on the west coast don't care as much about sports in general
    Nah, for NorCal anyway, we just don't care about college sports. Pretty rabid following for pro teams (and many championships and/or very close) over the last few decades for the Warriors, 49ers, SF Giants, etc. Even the lowly (but now much better) Sacramento Kings have die-hard fans.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Southeast New York
    Posts
    12,590
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Nah, for NorCal anyway, we just don't care about college sports. Pretty rabid following for pro teams (and many championships and/or very close) over the last few decades for the Warriors, 49ers, SF Giants, etc. Even the lowly (but now much better) Sacramento Kings have die-hard fans.
    Perennially mediocre teams always do. Hey, I've been a Mets fan since 1969 through thick and thin. LFGM!

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Orangina
    Posts
    9,653
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Nah, for NorCal anyway, we just don't care about college sports. Pretty rabid following for pro teams (and many championships and/or very close) over the last few decades for the Warriors, 49ers, SF Giants, etc. Even the lowly (but now much better) Sacramento Kings have die-hard fans.
    Are you really saying NorCal peeps don't follow college sports?

    Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
    "All God does is watch us and kill us when we get boring. We must never, ever be boring."

  7. #32
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Truckee & Nor Cal
    Posts
    16,402
    Quote Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater View Post
    Are you really saying NorCal peeps don't follow college sports?
    No, I'm say we follow them way less intensely than in some other regions and there's more focus on pro teams.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Alta
    Posts
    3,342
    The SoCal schools are in the same boat. Very much fair weather fans. When fucla or the university of spoiled children are good the whole city shows up. When they suck the stadiums are half full.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    I started grad school at Cal during the Rodgers Lynch years and I moved to Eugene right at the start of the Herbert years, any B1G cities looking for a future HOF QB wanna pay me a signing bonus to relocate in your city? Warning, my relocation may cause your school to leave its athletic conference.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    SF & the Ho
    Posts
    10,991
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    Nah, for NorCal anyway, we just don't care about college sports. Pretty rabid following for pro teams (and many championships and/or very close) over the last few decades for the Warriors, 49ers, SF Giants, etc. Even the lowly (but now much better) Sacramento Kings have die-hard fans.
    If that were true, Oakland would still have the raiders and the As wouldn’t be leaving. CA is all about the fair weather. Nothing wrong w that. We have a lot to choose from so if a team is good everyone jumps on the bandwagon. If they suck, attendance is dowwwwwwwn. No comparison between the hardcore base percentage in CA vs the east and nothing wrong w that. Ca doesn’t give a real fuck unless the team is winning - college or pro

  11. #36
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    inpdx
    Posts
    21,212
    Quote Originally Posted by altacoup View Post
    With the national consolidation, the product will be diluted as there’s sure to be plenty of 2-4 loss teams making the playoff.
    How is an 18-team conference going to have either an entire season or a conference champ? The season is only so long…

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    ECO
    Posts
    5,806
    Quote Originally Posted by k2skier112 View Post
    Gerrymandering of college sports
    Money ruins everything
    This.
    Growing up on the Pac10, er, 12, this would have been devastating to me as a kid. Nowadays it is more a disappointed shrug. The money, one-n-done in basketball, Chip at UCLA. Not a lot to get excited about anymore.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Eugenio Oregón
    Posts
    8,858
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiBall View Post
    Growing up on the Pac10, er, 12, this would have been devastating to me as a kid.
    Same, I wasn’t huge into college sports but man New Years was a special day. I grew up 15 mins from the Rose Bowl, worked on our city’s parade float as a kid, and it was always so fun waking up to the parade, watching the PAC10 and BIG10 champ marching bands, and then game coverage starting. Ended up going to college literally right down the road from the Rose Bowl and living in Old Town Pasadena for a year.
    _______________________________________________
    "Strapping myself to a sitski built with 30lb of metal and fibreglass then trying to water ski in it sounds like a stupid idea to me.

    I'll be there."
    ... Andy Campbell

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,857
    Quote Originally Posted by TahoeJ View Post
    No, I'm say we follow them way less intensely than in some other regions and there's more focus on pro teams.
    Which is why the Pac X didn't have a big TV contract. Plus the time gap means fewer east coast eyeballs.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    538
    Cal recruiting is hampered....both in blue chip players and coaching. Wilcox is an exception.

    They won't reduce the 'standard' for the student part of the athlete like many other schools. Their PC world of 'equality and opportunity for all' has put some really bad coaches in head jobs.

    Quote Originally Posted by mcski View Post
    If that were true, Oakland would still have the raiders and the As wouldn’t be leaving. CA is all about the fair weather. Nothing wrong w that. We have a lot to choose from so if a team is good everyone jumps on the bandwagon. If they suck, attendance is dowwwwwwwn. No comparison between the hardcore base percentage in CA vs the east and nothing wrong w that. Ca doesn’t give a real fuck unless the team is winning - college or pro

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    59715
    Posts
    8,282
    And there's the red hatter hot take fresh off of blaming the US women's loss on "woke".

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,543
    Quote Originally Posted by alias_rice View Post
    My thoughts as well. Imagine being a softball player from the west coast and now you have to travel to NJ for 3 games while trying to pass classes.

    A combo of greed and pure incompetence from the PAC killed 100 years of history. Pretty sad really. Plus now I have to road trip to Lubbock and Ames instead of Seattle and LA. At least the BBQ should be good.
    Totally agree. At this point I think the solution might be to break college football off as a separate entity. Run that like a minor league pro sport and let the other sports continue as they did before the NCAA turned into just another money grubbing entity.

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    ECO
    Posts
    5,806
    Quote Originally Posted by The AD View Post
    Totally agree. At this point I think the solution might be to break college football off as a separate entity. Run that like a minor league pro sport and let the other sports continue as they did before the NCAA turned into just another money grubbing entity.
    They would have to raise tuitions for all the money lost. Or not. I dunno, I am just a Cal St product. And our sports sucked, but it was a lot cheaper.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    28,543
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiBall View Post
    They would have to raise tuitions for all the money lost. Or not. I dunno, I am just a Cal St product. And our sports sucked, but it was a lot cheaper.
    It would still be college athletics, so the colleges themselves would have a stake in it, it just wouldn't be part of the current NCAA structure.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Behind the Potato Curtain
    Posts
    4,068
    I, for one, am excited to see the Ducks play OSU and Michigan hopefully on a more consistent basis.

    NorCal has loads of diehard SC and UCLA faithful and more than its share of Duck fans (UC Eugene). These former Pac schools all travel well, I'll still be watching.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,857
    Quote Originally Posted by esseff View Post
    Cal recruiting is hampered....both in blue chip players and coaching. Wilcox is an exception.

    They won't reduce the 'standard' for the student part of the athlete like many other schools. Their PC world of 'equality and opportunity for all' has put some really bad coaches in head jobs.
    Last I looked, a couple of years ago, Cal's grad rate for football sucked. As opposed to Stanford, which was strong.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    关你屁事
    Posts
    9,945
    Quote Originally Posted by old goat View Post
    Which is why the Pac X didn't have a big TV contract. Plus the time gap means fewer east coast eyeballs.
    It had a decent TV contract, that didn’t get renewed. The Big10 & SEC are the leagues with the big tv contracts which might reflect other differences too, like cable TV users

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Orangina
    Posts
    9,653
    Larry Scott straight up shanked the PAC 12. If you want a villain, it's definitely him. Everything after was fallout.

    Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
    "All God does is watch us and kill us when we get boring. We must never, ever be boring."

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,377
    Quote Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater View Post
    Larry Scott straight up shanked the PAC 12. If you want a villain, it's definitely him. Everything after was fallout.

    Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
    Big ol swing and a miss with the PAC-12 network. It had a very low chance of working and clearly was the gateway to selling hand jobs at the truck stop for the lower tier teams.

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,377
    Quote Originally Posted by altacoup View Post
    The SoCal schools are in the same boat. Very much fair weather fans. When fucla or the university of spoiled children are good the whole city shows up. When they suck the stadiums are half full.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums
    It's never about game ticket sales. TV market size and ad revenue dictate everything and BOTH USC and UCLA have a larger market than the rest of the conference put together.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •