Check Out Our Shop
Page 41 of 49 FirstFirst ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... LastLast
Results 1,001 to 1,025 of 1201

Thread: 80 series land cruiser futures

  1. #1001
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,896
    This I like.

  2. #1002
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,642
    Very nice. But where will the new 4Runner fit into the lineup?


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wq1d...RedlineReviews

  3. #1003
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The Mayonnaisium
    Posts
    11,005
    ^ That's the biggest question I have. The new LC Prado will undoubtedly cannibalize some 4Runner sales. Maybe that is OK for reasons (production, logistic, tax, etc.).


    This thing looks really cool and I'm glad it exists, but it also suggests the US doesn't get the 300 series GR Sport which is a bummer.

  4. #1004
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Montrose, CO
    Posts
    4,783
    I didn't think I'd have any interest in the new LC for myself, but I like it. Wonder what real world MPG will be like?

  5. #1005
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,013
    Consider the 80 series value to just have bumped up again. Clearly a retro influence

  6. #1006
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    11,258
    Just talked to Mrs. C who has been compiling a list of new cars to replace her '08 Outback and this just jumped to the top. Would look pretty good parked next to my 80.

    I think this article may have been a part of the decision. https://www.theonion.com/henry-ford-...8-s-1850660894
    Quote Originally Posted by Benny Profane View Post
    Well, I'm not allowed to delete this post, but, I can say, go fuck yourselves, everybody!

  7. #1007
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,158
    Wifey is on board. Local Toyota dealers have been pretty meh but this will be my next car. Really want the base model 1958 trim. Keeping the Jeep as a dedicated rock crawler but this new Land Cruiser looks tits.
    Live Free or Die

  8. #1008
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,270
    Quote Originally Posted by frorider View Post
    Attachment 466437

    Well it’s official now. Toyota kept the dimensions reasonable. IFS as expected. 2.4 hybrid.

    https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...iser-revealed/
    Looks like a Bronco had intimate relations with a Jeep Renegade... NTTAWWT.

  9. #1009
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    I can still smell Poutine.
    Posts
    26,751
    Quote Originally Posted by skaredshtles View Post
    Looks like a Bronco had intimate relations with a Jeep Renegade... NTTAWWT.
    Bahahahahahahahahah

  10. #1010
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    6,411
    I like it.

    Now they need to replace the 4Runner with a modern 1st gen / N60: 2 door, removable canopy. Bronco killer.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  11. #1011
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Access to Granlibakken
    Posts
    11,931
    Read somewhere that the hybrid battery makes the rear floor height kinda high.

    That power train gets 22 mpg combined in tundra, so maybe 23 or 24 in the LC?

    I haven’t paid much attention to the hybrid tundra but thought I heard complaints that towing up long grades sucks, the hybrid battery runs low & you’re redlining in a low ass gear. :shrug:

  12. #1012
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,642
    It’s about 2 inches higher because of the battery. Looks weird.

    Full time 4wd plus locking rear and center diffs are standard.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  13. #1013
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    8,158
    Quote Originally Posted by nickwm21 View Post
    I like it.

    Now they need to replace the 4Runner with a modern 1st gen / N60: 2 door, removable canopy. Bronco killer.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    The internet is speculating this to be the case, given the close proximity in size between the current 4 Runner and this new Land Cruiser.
    Live Free or Die

  14. #1014
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    11,364
    I’m getting closer to making a bad decision with these new Toyota SUV’s.

    New Sequoia is beautiful and now this! Next the new 4Runner comes out? Shit.

    I’ve been enjoying no car payment and zero issues on my 2011 4Runner for so long. About time to say fuck my 401k contribution and add a new car payment.

  15. #1015
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boulder
    Posts
    1,397

    80 series land cruiser futures

    In related news, seen on the streets of Paris yesterday. Definitely well used. Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1323.jpg 
Views:	119 
Size:	1.48 MB 
ID:	466467

  16. #1016
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    93108
    Posts
    2,856
    Only thing I like about the 250 Prado is its size is comparable to the 100 series, which in my eyes is the perfect trail size. Not stoked on the motor package because I tow, but, for the average consumer who is more concerned with MPG and not GVWR/Tow capacities, this Prado should be a nice fit.

  17. #1017
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    The new LC is confusing.

    The base model is $20k more than I paid for my new TRD ORP 4Runner with KDSS in 2018. It has worse ground clearance, a more down-market interior (no power seats, no softex, etc), a much more complex drivetrain and a suspension that isn't anywhere close to as good. It has a shit ton of plastic body molding that is unpainted, which as a former Xterra owner I can attest to being a massive pain in the ass to live with. The plastic molding is impossible to keep clean and it slowly degrades over time- the color fades and there is nothing you can do to fix it. It also has what appears to have less storage space due to batteries being stored in the trunk area.

    I don't understand what Toyota is thinking. The new LC seems to be a more expensive but worse 4Runner.

    I'm sure there will be plenty of people who want one though, which means dealer markups and insane wait times.

  18. #1018
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,896
    It’s not 2018 anymore.

    I’m also surprised by the extent of the unpainted exterior pieces but I’d bet most of that will quickly be replaced with trail jewelry/armor.

  19. #1019
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Snowmass
    Posts
    604
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevo View Post
    I don't understand what Toyota is thinking. The new LC seems to be a more expensive but worse 4Runner.

    I'm sure there will be plenty of people who want one though, which means dealer markups and insane wait times.
    You've pretty much answered your own question. The other main reason is to maximize the revenue they can extract from the TNGA-F platform by building for as wide a market as the platform will support. The traditional new LC buyer was quite wealthy, so why provide them a cheaper alternative to the LX. Now the 200 series buyers will graduate into a more expensive LX and everyone gets to choose their flavor of TNGA-F (Prado, Landcruiser, Sequia, Tacoma, Tundra, GX, and presumably the new 4runner). There's certainly a lot of overlap in their suv lineup, but they don't have maintain massively different production lines to support them.

  20. #1020
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Orangina
    Posts
    9,653
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevo View Post
    The new LC is confusing.

    The base model is $20k more than I paid for my new TRD ORP 4Runner with KDSS in 2018. It has worse ground clearance, a more down-market interior (no power seats, no softex, etc), a much more complex drivetrain and a suspension that isn't anywhere close to as good. It has a shit ton of plastic body molding that is unpainted, which as a former Xterra owner I can attest to being a massive pain in the ass to live with. The plastic molding is impossible to keep clean and it slowly degrades over time- the color fades and there is nothing you can do to fix it. It also has what appears to have less storage space due to batteries being stored in the trunk area.

    I don't understand what Toyota is thinking. The new LC seems to be a more expensive but worse 4Runner.

    I'm sure there will be plenty of people who want one though, which means dealer markups and insane wait times.
    Why do you think the drivetrain is superior in your 4runner? This little sucker has 450lbs of torque, more HP, and boasts 27mpg (call it ~23). While the idea of a 4 banger LC is odd to me, I'd think this is a superior drivetrain to previous 4runners....as long as it proves reliable.

    Trim aside, they're going to sell the shit out of this.

    Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
    "All God does is watch us and kill us when we get boring. We must never, ever be boring."

  21. #1021
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    2,666
    80 SERIES futures.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PXL_20230804_010005211~2.jpg 
Views:	160 
Size:	2.34 MB 
ID:	466579

  22. #1022
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Movin' On
    Posts
    3,954
    Quote Originally Posted by grabtindy View Post
    You've pretty much answered your own question. The other main reason is to maximize the revenue they can extract from the TNGA-F platform by building for as wide a market as the platform will support. The traditional new LC buyer was quite wealthy, so why provide them a cheaper alternative to the LX. Now the 200 series buyers will graduate into a more expensive LX and everyone gets to choose their flavor of TNGA-F (Prado, Landcruiser, Sequia, Tacoma, Tundra, GX, and presumably the new 4runner). There's certainly a lot of overlap in their suv lineup, but they don't have maintain massively different production lines to support them.
    I think what was appealing about the 200 series was that it was a stealth wealth car. People that know it understand how awesome it is. People that don't know just see a Toyota. It wasn't super flashy on the outside.

    Now in order to have it, you need to get it with Lexus badging and not awesome approach angles.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Reverend Floater View Post
    Why do you think the drivetrain is superior in your 4runner? This little sucker has 450lbs of torque, more HP, and boasts 27mpg (call it ~23). While the idea of a 4 banger LC is odd to me, I'd think this is a superior drivetrain to previous 4runners....as long as it proves reliable.

    Trim aside, they're going to sell the shit out of this.

    Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
    The 4 liter V6 in 5th Gen 4runners is mechanically simple and lasts forever.

    The new LC has more power and better gas mileage, but it has a very mechanically complex drive train. I think it will most likely be less reliable because it has so many additional points of failure.

  23. #1023
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,734
    It’ll be interesting to see how the drivetrain holds up. How many other Toyota trucks will it be standard for (or an option)? Taco, 4Runner?


    Btw, I’m pretty sure my ‘99 100-series has the same 6500# towing capacity.

  24. #1024
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    General Sherman's Favorite City
    Posts
    37,245
    I like it and expect that it will give Defender buyers something more reliable to cross shop.
    I still call it The Jake.

  25. #1025
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    the ham
    Posts
    14,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevo View Post
    The 4 liter V6 in 5th Gen 4runners is mechanically simple and lasts forever.
    True. The 2nd gen 1GR is bulletproof. That said, my 5th gen 4R costs $90ish to fill up in NW WA.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •