
Originally Posted by
Marshal Olson
Yes, 100%
I would just expand on this a little:
(1) For all mountain reverse skis, they do best (IMO) with a proper radius to the reverse profile
(2) The radius should be no smaller than the radius of the sidecut
(3) Opening the radius further than the sidecut radius actually helps engage all the way through the tip/tail widepoints a little better
(4) It's really important for a reverse all mountain ski to be heavy enough, as they bounce around alot more than a cambered ski when light
It's also really important for a reverse all mountain ski to be stiff enough (since its bent into a shape already) but not too stiff (since there isn't camber to suspend the ends of the ski). And this is where having a reverse radius that is actually a little bigger than the sidecut radius is helpful, to tune the flex pattern and give a little more suspension when you need it, but still keep the carve/drift/slash feeling.
Pheeeew, been reading through this whole damn thread, it is a fuckin lot of reading, but I still don’t have a good idea of what “FR flex” (yes I read that in this thread) equates to? I love everything you’ve said about this ski, specs look perfect and, I reeeaaally want. But do you have any sort of comparison or better explanation of the stiffness? Personally I think this ski in a Praxis 4+ to 5 + would be pretty money, these need to be pretty stiff in my experience, but I really understand not making them “too” stiff as well. Just looking for a little more context I guess. Please and thanks
Fear, Doubt, Disbelief, you have to let it all go. Free your mind!
Bookmarks