Check Out Our Shop
Page 23 of 28 FirstFirst ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LastLast
Results 551 to 575 of 697

Thread: Katana 108 - the resurrerection

  1. #551
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    588
    Well if I had a pair of K108's, I would definitely mount on the rec line. I just did a remount to my M102's back to the rec line after being about 12mm forward of rec. That was the way to go for me. Maybe my reason for liking the back line is that I am a bigfoot in a 28.5 boot. Pretty sure both Bandit and Shorty J have small feet which could explain why they like +1.

  2. #552
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,791
    Quote Originally Posted by Fred Pabst View Post
    Well if I had a pair of K108's, I would definitely mount on the rec line. I just did a remount to my M102's back to the rec line after being about 12mm forward of rec. That was the way to go for me. Maybe my reason for liking the back line is that I am a bigfoot in a 28.5 boot. Pretty sure both Bandit and Shorty J have small feet which could explain why they like +1.
    You are 100% right about me, but I think Bandit is on the line.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  3. #553
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,824
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  4. #554
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??
    Definitely not the skill of the rider.

    I think you’re mounted forward on a flat camber ski that likes to wander anyways. You lean back and widen your stance and there you go. But without watching it who knows.

    I got rid of mine because at speed in variable snow I had to spend too much time minding the tips.
    focus.

  5. #555
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367

    Katana 108 - the resurrerection

    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    You are 100% right about me, but I think Bandit is on the line.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    295-mm BSL and I’m on the rear line. Couldn’t imagine needing to go forward (for my style), but I also have 200-lbs working for me with this ski. [emoji16]
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  6. #556
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Just spent Friday up at Blackcomb on my 184’s. OMG…I almost forgot how much I enjoy these on a Big mountain with Big terrain. Spent lots of time well north of 50-mph on soft groomers. I love how easy they are to back off the edges, slide the tails around, and shut down speed. Then, jump off trail in the 6-8” of Pow and wind-affected crud and they float and push through everything. With the 3D sidecut, they are like a fat race ski, with just enough give in that tail to feel forgiving in crappy snow.

    I think I need a backup pair of 184’s. [emoji6]
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  7. #557
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    Definitely not the skill of the rider.
    Heh, my skill is def in question.

    But seriously, cant tell if you’re being snarky and saying it’s me (it’s likely me, I just don’t know why), or you’re saying that you had some similar drama with them?


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  8. #558
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,824
    Also, I am mounted forward, but would 1.5 cm cause that problem? If I don’t click with these I likely won’t risk the value loss in a remount to find out, I think I’ll move on.


    Sent from my iPad using TGR Forums

  9. #559
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    If you can ski the OG Cochise and Vwerks, you’re no slouch. So, I’m going with stance/style or tune. Both the OG Cochise and Vwerks have a much larger, single radius sidecut, which may also be a factor. Also, if you are a skis close together kind of skier, those fat tips and 3D sidecut can work against you.

    I cannot quite put my finger on it, but after spending so much time on my 184 M102/K108 (and perhaps adjusting my technique to suit those skis), I have really fallen out of love with my 185 OG Cochise. Like in a “what did I ever like about these?” kind of way.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  10. #560
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    my own little world
    Posts
    6,247

    Katana 108 - the resurrerection

    Little snark… old TGR habits die hard.

    But also, I found them to be twitchy and you had to think about both skis to keep them in line at speed on any snow that wasn’t smooth. For me, this meant thinking about how much rotational force I was applying to each ski, especially when they were flat or in variable conditions.

    Forward mount exacerbated this. If your skill/experience level isn’t up to it or you have bad habits, that will be magnified too. I bet they’re great at low speeds on groomers or in 6” of fresh snow. I bet longer sidecut skis you leave the outside ski behind frequently, but with the weird 3d+ tight sidecut you see the opposite with these.
    focus.

  11. #561
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Mustonen View Post
    . I bet longer sidecut skis you leave the outside ski behind frequently, but with the weird 3d+ tight sidecut you see the opposite with these.
    Ah, now were getting somewhere. Leaving the outside ski behind is something that I have had to focus on not doing with other skis in the past, but it seemed like I could overcome it/get past it.

    I’m sure I have loads of bad habits engrained at this point but I’ve never really had a ski that I thought much about after a handful of runs on it.


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  12. #562
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    I'm 160 lbs, and the skis are 177, mounted on the most forward if the three lines. My last skis were 184 metal katanas 112. I felt today that if i load the tips like on the 112s, the tips were diving. Any comments?
    Likely not the answer you're looking for, but based on your previous ski, I bet you'd be happier on the 184. Tip dive isn't something I've personally experienced on these.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    Just spent Friday up at Blackcomb on my 184’s. OMG…I almost forgot how much I enjoy these on a Big mountain with Big terrain. Spent lots of time well north of 50-mph on soft groomers. I love how easy they are to back off the edges, slide the tails around, and shut down speed. Then, jump off trail in the 6-8” of Pow and wind-affected crud and they float and push through everything. With the 3D sidecut, they are like a fat race ski, with just enough give in that tail to feel forgiving in crappy snow.
    Yah, ^ this all sounds right; they're a pretty unreal Blackcomb DD for traditional folks like us. I have 50 some days on my pair and have hardly grabbed anything else this year.

    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    I skied mine for the first time. I’m 5’11”, 165 pounds mounted at +1.5 on the 184. They skied great on groomers and anywhere without moguls that I could let them run but I’m not sure they are the daily driver I’m looking for. In moguls, I found them to be a handful.
    The other area that I had some trouble was in steep, tight trees with lightly tracked to untracked, settled snow of about 12 inches. They felt a little too locked into turns for this condition. Like I would commit to a turn but then see the spacing in the trees differently and it didn’t feel like I could easily release and change the turn shape, which would put me off of my preferred line.
    Sorry you're not getting along with em. As Bandit said above though, none of this ^ is super surprising. They definitely fall into the metal lam charger camp with similar characteristics to that class, the rocker profile and sidecut just make em more accessible IME. Great DD for a place like Blackcomb (mostly open spaces), and while I like em in steeps (I just like steeps), in 2 and 3D, I also generally ski a turn or two ahead and try not to stop in sketchy places, which lines up well with the K108s attributes (min speed but no max kinda ski). And if I'm skiing moguls, I fucked up. Hope you find the unicorn you're looking for! 6'2/195#, on the 191 at plus 1.

  13. #563
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else
    Posts
    5,791
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Not trying to be snarky when I ask if you have a true bar? Edge high could cause this but that can't be diagnosed over the internet.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    Goal: ski in the 2018/19 season

  14. #564
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,975
    Btw, on my k108, I've been crossing tips too. I'm going to check the tune, did are 3 days from new

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

  15. #565
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,824
    Quote Originally Posted by Shorty_J View Post
    Not trying to be snarky when I ask if you have a true bar? Edge high could cause this but that can't be diagnosed over the internet.

    Sent from my SM-A536W using Tapatalk
    I do not, but I could probably have a shop check? If this were the case and it was a tune problem, wouldn’t it show up on groomers as well? As far as I know, this has only happened off trail, which leads me to believe its my (lack of) technique not clicking with the ski.

    Edit: looks like Rod has had this happen too?

  16. #566
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Rossland BC
    Posts
    1,961
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Ok, this is a dumb question and may be a tune thing that I don’t understand, but in the two days I’ve been on these, I’ve crossed the tips 3-4 times, twice resulting in a spectacular crash. Three times in steep moguls, and once today in moderate angle, moderately smooth snow. For the record, in the past two weeks I’ve also skied my OG Cochise and my V-werks Katanas and haven’t done this. As far as I know, I haven’t crossed tips in years.

    Is it the ski, the tune, style, stance??


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Powerful traditional skis are particularly sensitive to the tune. A good friend was just complaining about her M102s being “hooky” and demanding, but a basic hand tune (2 degree side, 1 degree base, and light gummy 12” back from the tip and tail) and she’s loving them. I wouldn’t expect Volkls to be railed, but worth checking.

  17. #567
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    55
    I got a few days on my new (to me) K108's 184's that I got off another member here. The first few runs I tried them I took them right off and went back to my M102's. The tips were everywhere when trying to get them on edge and go through bumpy stuff on the groomers and in the trees. Thought these weren't going to be my skis.

    The group I was staying with in SLC had a set of these same skis and feeling the edges back to back, these were like a razor blade compared to the others that had a bunch of days on them (which the owner was getting along with). A round of de-tuning from the local shop, and they were still quite a bit sharper than the other guys skis, but MUCH improved on the slope. I could actually move these things around and get the tails to release when I needed them to. These things are rippers now.

  18. #568
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,975
    I had to detune the tips on mine. I was crossing the tips, which i can't remember the last time this happened with all my other skis.

    Fixed the problem

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

  19. #569
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    9,824
    Quote Originally Posted by GHILL28 View Post
    I got a few days on my new (to me) K108's 184's that I got off another member here. The first few runs I tried them I took them right off and went back to my M102's. The tips were everywhere when trying to get them on edge and go through bumpy stuff on the groomers and in the trees. Thought these weren't going to be my skis.

    The group I was staying with in SLC had a set of these same skis and feeling the edges back to back, these were like a razor blade compared to the others that had a bunch of days on them (which the owner was getting along with). A round of de-tuning from the local shop, and they were still quite a bit sharper than the other guys skis, but MUCH improved on the slope. I could actually move these things around and get the tails to release when I needed them to. These things are rippers now.
    Ha,I guess I should’ve (de)tuned them before deciding they weren’t for me? Glad they are working for you now.

  20. #570
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    250
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    If you can ski the OG Cochise and Vwerks, you’re no slouch. So, I’m going with stance/style or tune. Both the OG Cochise and Vwerks have a much larger, single radius sidecut, which may also be a factor. Also, if you are a skis close together kind of skier, those fat tips and 3D sidecut can work against you.

    I cannot quite put my finger on it, but after spending so much time on my 184 M102/K108 (and perhaps adjusting my technique to suit those skis), I have really fallen out of love with my 185 OG Cochise. Like in a “what did I ever like about these?” kind of way.
    Bandit man - where do you have yours mounted. I love my 102s so much thinking about picking these up (184 as well) but would probably want to mount a cm or two forward.

  21. #571
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Squaw valley
    Posts
    4,975
    I initially mounted my 177 k108s on the more forward line and the tips were diving too much in powder, so i remounted on the back line, recommended, and problem solved

    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk

  22. #572
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by zion zig zag View Post
    Ha,I guess I should’ve (de)tuned them before deciding they weren’t for me? Glad they are working for you now.
    Ah that's right, they were yours. I think we were dealing via text and I forgot what the TGR handle was.

    The binding mounting ended up with true center closer to +1 than on the rec line with the heel plate being moved, so I may think about re-mounting them again at some point if there's adequate space between the hole edges. Not sure yet. The edge tuning was the main thing so they do smear around consistently on steep bumpy stuff between the trees really well now, but then want to be going mach 10 on the open choppy stuff too. Neat skis.

  23. #573
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lapping the pow with the GSA in the PNW
    Posts
    5,367

    Katana 108 - the resurrerection

    Quote Originally Posted by MD12 View Post
    Bandit man - where do you have yours mounted. I love my 102s so much thinking about picking these up (184 as well) but would probably want to mount a cm or two forward.
    I’m on the rear line for all my recent Volkls, and I’m only in a 295-mm BSL. I like driving the shovels and with that large sweet spot, it feels perfect for 184’s.

    On the topic of hooky K108’s, as has been shared, it’s all about detuning. My K108’s are soooo easy to slide the tails around, especially when scrubbing speed above 50-mph and coming to a quick stop. Might be the easiest ski I have to perform this maneuver on.

    Also, I’ll admit that the long-ish rocker but minimal splay might give some pause on how aggressive to get with detuning. It was a progression for me, but I feel like detuning really allows the 3D sidecut to shine, especially in heavy, dense snow.
    Last edited by Bandit Man; 03-22-2023 at 05:33 PM.
    In constant pursuit of the perfect slarve...

  24. #574
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,391
    Another Katana in the wild.
    6 inches new on top of variable yesterday at Targhee. Leftovers today and tomorrow should be another powder day. For the second season Katana goes along on western road trips.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image1679527186.652776.jpg 
Views:	183 
Size:	143.0 KB 
ID:	452832


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  25. #575
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    OR
    Posts
    1,948
    Just mounted these up for a buddy. Quite envious. Good thing we have the same BSL.

    I told him to get the 192 dynastar m-free 108s a few years ago and he went 182 instead and was under-gunned. I reckon these 184s I recommended will do the trick and open his eyes.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_4296.JPG 
Views:	178 
Size:	229.8 KB 
ID:	452870

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •