Check Out Our Shop
Page 36 of 84 FirstFirst ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... LastLast
Results 876 to 900 of 2078

Thread: Climate Change

  1. #876
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Last Best City in the Last Best Place
    Posts
    8,194
    Quote Originally Posted by rod9301 View Post
    The rational reasons, you only have to look at Europe.

    They will need gas fired plants, none authorized. They need lng genuinely, none authorized.
    They were out are planning to shut down nuclear plants.

    The switch to renewables has to happen in an orderly way, we still need carbon based power plants until renewables, coupled with storage are fully available.

    And even if you don't like my arguments, it's stupid to say move on.

    Sometimes you have to listen to people that might have a different opinion.



    Sent from my moto g 5G using Tapatalk
    I think Fareed does a good job in this commentary explaining your position, that we are headed for a major energy crisis and need a better transition strategy.


  2. #877
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Bull City
    Posts
    14,003
    It's a lot easier to sit here a ways inland way above sea level and far from the equator, with plenty of potable water and not feel so rushed. Meanwhile last week a third of Pakistan was under water..
    Go that way really REALLY fast. If something gets in your way, TURN!

  3. #878
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    404
    Quote Originally Posted by yeahman View Post
    I think Fareed does a good job in this commentary explaining your position, that we are headed for a major energy crisis and need a better transition strategy.

    ^yup....and strongly agree with rod9301

    again incase you missed it...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3ScJ_FwaZk

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBpiXcyB7wU

    We all want renewables to happen and it has to happen this way^....I agree with how Biden is dealing with the oil and gas industries and it needs to happen, BUT he jumped the gun and rushed it...this shouldn't have happened until ALL our renewables and grids have been built and proven....then its time to phase out oil/gas....now he is simply responsible for an energy crisis and inflation. You can do your own research on how prices were rising before the Ukraine invasion so save the argument.

    Its going to take decades before we can get our infrastructure for renewables built, it is absolute priority that in order to achieve this that we have a healthy economy!

  4. #879
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    404
    awesome vid on electrical power engineering....put things into perspective
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhxo2oXRiio

  5. #880
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    So when we started CAFE standards for cars why did they allow the SUV and pickup explosion?
    Obviously work trucks need big engines. But the soccer moms in big trucks drives me crazy.

    Side rant. I need vans for work. Ten months ago a transit was $4k over the $40k asking price. Now they’re selling MSRP. But it’s $44k. For an empty box with no interior. Wtf

  6. #881
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    1,623
    I’m pretty sure the Venn diagram for the people saying “we need an energy transition strategy” and “climate change isn’t real”, “climate change is real but not caused by man”, “climate change is cause by man, but we can’t change course” , “what’s Al Gores carbon footprint?” is a circle.

    Even a casual reader of the news will understand that certain political groups have been attempting to implement energy and economy transition plans via Congress for several decades now.

    Unfortunately the time for a nice, orderly transition away from fossil fuels is/has passed so now it’s going to hurt. Even better is that because we waited we are also going to get to eat all the costs of climate change via weather damage, food insecurity, and population migration.

  7. #882
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Moose, Iowa
    Posts
    8,104
    Our now closed nuclear plant is being converted to a 200 megawatt solar plant. 2 dems voted for it and the one Republican voted against it. Thankfully we live on an island of blue semi sanity inside a sea of red. Sanity won this time.

    Tell me who is standing in the way of progress again? This is replaying all over the country. One of our Republican controlled counties on the barren west coast of Iowa voted down a windmill farm because...it needs to go somewhere less scenic...lol.

    And yes, the nuclear plant should still be up and running. But it isn't, because it wasn't economical to run without subsidies of some sort, against the backdrop of wind/cheap natural gas, and our government (both parties) hasn't stepped up to the plate.

    Final nail in the coffin of the Nuclear plant was, go figure, a climate induced derecho, the size and strength unprecedented. Closed even earlier than the planned early closure.

    The right has been radicalized. Pro oil. Anti renewable. Then they cry we are moving too fast, going to wreck the economy...blah, blah, as they work to stop the transition. Self fulfilling prophecy.



    Sent from my SM-G991U1 using Tapatalk

  8. #883
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10,628
    Sure, in a perfect world, in transition we would balance the outgoing old with the incoming new, keeping the energy flow stable and predictable, with all parties contributing for the better of all, and it would have started 40 years ago. Didn't happen then, and we're not much closer now. Human nature has other plans, some more selfish than others, and ultimately it's going to hurt in the short term. The longer we draw it out, the bigger that hurt is going to be. The old (energy) culture will not relinquish its power willingly - if it were up to them many would simply squeeze every last $ out of the oil sources, arguing against any "transition" until after the oil is gone. There's just too many greedy people, including the consumer, unwilling to make the hard choices early to avoid the future much bigger pain.
    And I'm pretty confident that the current spate of "mandates" for green energy at a given date, while probably unrealistic in their time frames, will push us the right direction. Heck, it's even possible in a weirdly perverted way, sometime in the future, that the UKR war will be considered a critical event in pushing the world in a better energy direction. Thanks, Putin!
    NOT SAYING THE WAR IS A GOOD THING
    There definitely are problems with renewables, and ultimately they will probably remain a second tier energy source, but will still be significant in their contribution. Ultimately nuclear fission/fusion seems like the obvious replacement for oil, and yet resistance remains high and will continue to do so. I fear that the only way to increase it's acceptance is to shock the current system, hopefully just enough to change peoples minds but avoid serious damage.

  9. #884
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    truckee
    Posts
    24,840
    We have already run out of time, and if carbon emissions went to zero tomorrow things would still get worse for decades. It boggles the mind that anyone who is living through the western drought and fires or the flooding in the South or has watched TV or read the news cannot understand how dire things already are.

  10. #885
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,712
    I think I said this before (maybe a different thread), in global locations with long haul trucking infrastructure, Shell is hedging, planning, and spending for a two-step electrification conversion process: cow manure conversion to “biogas” for long haul trucks (all other highway vehicles are electric); then tech catches up and long haul trucks are fully electric.

  11. #886
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Every single renewable energy relies on fossil fuels for it to be created/implemented. Making drilling and fossil fuels harder to get will drive the price of renewables up at the same time.

  12. #887
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10,628
    Fair point; the non-energy related uses of fossil fuels a fundamental part of essentially every infrastructure. The critical difference of course is that those non-energy elements aren't being combusted, never to be used again. In theory, they can be recycled to at least some degree. The need to use dirty fossil fuels to make energy should be kept to an absolute minimum. This still leaves the question of how do we get there from here quickly and with as little pain as possible.

  13. #888
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by PB View Post
    Fair point; the non-energy related uses of fossil fuels a fundamental part of essentially every infrastructure. The critical difference of course is that those non-energy elements aren't being combusted, never to be used again. In theory, they can be recycled to at least some degree. The need to use dirty fossil fuels to make energy should be kept to an absolute minimum. This still leaves the question of how do we get there from here quickly and with as little pain as possible.

    If the world can figure out how to create steel, concrete and polymers without the use of fossil fuels then we will be on the right track. Hydrogen is probably the correct direction.

    On top of that, lithium mines are absolutely disgusting and are in regions with little to no regulation compared to the USA and Canada.

  14. #889
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    outer spokanistan
    Posts
    1,150
    Quote Originally Posted by PB View Post
    .... squeeze every last $ out of the oil sources ....
    .
    and THAT is exactly what will happen,
    sorry Earth

    .
    "we all do dumb shit when we're fucked up"
    mike tyson

  15. #890
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    10,628
    Quote Originally Posted by SoVT Joey View Post
    If the world can figure out how to create steel, concrete and polymers without the use of fossil fuels then we will be on the right track. Hydrogen is probably the correct direction.

    On top of that, lithium mines are absolutely disgusting and are in regions with little to no regulation compared to the USA and Canada.
    Curious: how can hydrogen be used in structural elements? I've always been intrigued by fuel cell tech, but am not familiar with hydrogen's application elsewhere.

  16. #891
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Location
    Danby
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by PB View Post
    Curious: how can hydrogen be used in structural elements? I've always been intrigued by fuel cell tech, but am not familiar with hydrogen's application elsewhere.

    I meant hydrogen in fuel cells for heavy equipment. Concrete can be made then in a green way. There is a guy that I read about that’s making “hempcrete”. It’s supposedly fairly strong and very green. Ore could be harvested the same for iron and steel. Polymers… we’ll stick up the creek without a paddle. But cellulose and other green fibers are being worked with to substitute in some instances. So maybe that’s the direction for that.

  17. #892
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    9,712
    There’s also mass timber construction material.

  18. #893
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    404
    what do we really know about the sun? what if it farted and is burning 2-5 degrees warmer for the next 100 years?

  19. #894
    Join Date
    Jul 2022
    Location
    Long Lake, NY and Marble, CO
    Posts
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by mar123 View Post
    what do we really know about the sun? what if it farted and is burning 2-5 degrees warmer for the next 100 years?
    Boy, you're a special kind of stupid.

  20. #895
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    the LCC
    Posts
    1,265
    Dr. A, your last post I wholeheartedly supported.
    This one I do not.
    This thread has been remarkable in that folks are civil yet thinking outside the box some.
    I for one am learning a lot from more educated types and have enjoyed the lack of adolescent posts.
    A lil respect here, please...
    I think you and mar are on the same page actually.
    Time spent skiing cannot be deducted from one's life.

  21. #896
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,755
    I dunno man, that was a pretty stupid comment. I'm pretty sure we know a lot about the sun.

  22. #897
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    livin the dream
    Posts
    6,400
    Quote Originally Posted by bodywhomper View Post
    There’s also mass timber construction material.
    That’s going super well for Katerra….


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    Best Skier on the Mountain
    Self-Certified
    1992 - 2012
    Squaw Valley, USA

  23. #898
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    the LCC
    Posts
    1,265
    I'm assuming mar was pretending to be a denier and talking tongue in cheek.
    Mar?
    Time spent skiing cannot be deducted from one's life.

  24. #899
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    In a van... down by the river
    Posts
    15,267
    Sarcasm on the innertoobz is hard.

  25. #900
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    22,532
    The sun does fart. Or burp.

    But sunspots have been down for years, the whole while we are scorching.

    If that wasn’t sarcasm, then yes that was a stupid post.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •