The conversation is about financial burden of civilian suits for police misconduct falling on the municipality's general funds budget instead of on the police department budget. It's not about COLA's on the pension fund. Perhaps you'd want to reply to MB's post with a relevant response rather than "but what about the COLA's????" And no I am not MB, HighAngle, Ted Cruz or SVS. Just an M series Jong, "long time listener, first time caller". It's funny how you post stuff on here and then say "it's private". BTW, how much is your ex-wife's house worth these days?
Haha. poked.
This particular pissing match should have ended pages ago.
I think anyone who has an alias to be unknown and uses it to insult a mag who is know IRL is an asshole at best. Jong. So how about you be a big boy and stay on topic. Take your shit to polyass.
Change the subject. As a white guy, with white privilege, in over 50 years 've had about 15-20 interactions with police. The only time I got slammed was when I got lippy with the cop. Adjusted for inflation $900 dollar fine for being in the park after hours to make out with my lady. OTOH in a similar situation I let the lady speak and when I started the car to go the cop came back and said we didn't have to leave.
What's your white privilege story?
A few people feel the rain. Most people just get wet.
I’m alive?
Well maybe I'm the faggot America
I'm not a part of a redneck agenda
Hitchhiking on the Garden State Parkway in, oh, about 1977, with a big chunk of hash in my backpack "hidden" in a sneaker. I mean, I was so stupid I was ON the parkway, not an entrance. Cop calmly drives up, goes into my pack, immediately goes for the sneaker, finds hash, puts me in car, drives to trooper barracks a mile away. I am not under arrest, minimal talk, I'm thinking, oh fucking shit, you idiot. Get to barracks, he leaves me in car, not locked, no handcuffs. Goes into barracks, comes out maybe five minutes later, walking to car he says to another trooper, very loudly, Hey, Jack, you should see the piece of hash I just scored! Tells me he's letting me go, don't be so stupid again. Yes sir, I am outta there.
That hash was for shit, anyway. He probably would have charged me after smoking it.
If anyone would actually like to know how municipal budgets/police settlements work, here is a good article from the UCLA Law Review. You can access it for free, but it works better on a computer than mobile (at least for me).
Short version:
The only group really at risk for budget disruptions do misconduct settlements are small towns that can't cover the increase in liability payments. Go to page 1176 go see discussion/quotes of how functional police funding is affected by the settlements as things are set up now, even when money technically comes from the department.
Larger cities mostly pay from budgets independent of the police (58%) or all city agencies contribute to a central liability fund (23%). In only 16% of cases do agencies pay from their own budget. For the departments that are contributing something, many are just given a line item in their budget to pay for lawsuits (money which can't be used for other things if they don't much of the time).
The Boston Police Department is given an annual allocation for litigation payouts-an
average of about $1.3 million per year-but during the three years of my study,
lawsuits involving the Department cost, on average, three times that amount and
the city, not the Department, paid the remainder. 8
From 2012-2014, the Chicago Police Department was allocated, on average, about $16.5 million per year
for lawsuit payouts. During these three years, an annual average of over $52 million was paid in lawsuits involving the Chicago Police Department with the excess paid from city funds." 9Note: this is from an article that is arguing against just taking the money for settlements from police budgets (though mostly just because the way it is done doesn't actually much affect how much money the police have in large municipalities.Law enforcement agencies that pay settlements and judgments from their budgets but pass along excess litigation costs appear to be as insulated from the financial impact of lawsuits as those law enforcement agencies that pay no litigation costs at all. When faced with large police payouts, these jurisdictions have been known to compromise other aspects of city or county services while preserving their law enforcement agency's budget. As one former attorney for the City
of Chicago reflected:
[When you had to budget more for [police] tort liability you had less to do lead poisoning screening for the poor children of Chicago. Wehad a terrible lead poisoning problem and there was a direct relationship between the two. Those kids were paying those tort judgments, not the police officers. 110
Last edited by MarcusBrody; 04-25-2021 at 02:01 PM.
Sheesh. No fun.
I'm not Highangle, SVS, MB or whoever TBS is saying I am. M series jong, long time listener, first time caller.
Only known troll on this thread is Benny, who recently shit posted SVS after he was in any Avy and had injuries.
BTW (and back on thread topic) Benny I see you haven't replied to MB's posts. Seems like some solid evidence that police debts aren't experiencing significant financial impact from civilian suits. maybe you have some refuting evidence to offer?
You see, you poked him.
You seem obsessed with poking. For your own sake, I hope you get laid sometime in the next decade.
Were you going to reply to MB's posts?
MB (and others including Dr. Ray from Brookings) argue that police departments currently do not currently incur significant financial impact from civilian lawsuits for police misconduct. Changing that to place financial burden on the police departments might create more institutional accountability for the police departments. Waiting to hear your response. Or did you just come hear to post about corrupt LAPD Black/Hispanic cops (which is not in dispute, we have all seen Denzel and Dre in Training Day) on the same day of the Chauvin verdict? You're not an obfuscating deflector troll are you?
To be fair, Benny's not strictly a troll.
A troll has to have intent to obfuscate.
Benny can't help it; it's just a symptom of that common, undying and too often exerted need to be right, to have one's ego dominant, independent of the argument or supporting data.
Merde De Glace On the Freak When Ski
>>>200 cm Black Bamboo Sidewalled DPS Lotus 120 : Best Skis Ever <<<
You poking me?
If was you at this point he should say no
Lee Lau - xxx-er is the laziest Asian canuck I know
I have been in this State for 30 years and I am willing to admit that I am part of the problem.
"Happiest years of my life were earning < $8.00 and hour, collecting unemployment every spring and fall, no car, no debt and no responsibilities. 1984-1990 Park City UT"
Ha, I just did that.
Bookmarks