Check Out Our Shop
Page 393 of 625 FirstFirst ... 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 ... LastLast
Results 9,801 to 9,825 of 15625

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #9801
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    I hope you are right. I WANT you to be right. I kept saying...”why am I having to fight this ski so much on the groomers when it is AMAZING off trail?”

    I hate that I have to go screw with getting a new tune when someone obviously spent a decent amount of time putting a finish on the skis. I’ve never skied anything that felt this awkward on groomers...and I’ve tried a few skis. [emoji6]
    I had the exact same feeling last season on my pair. I loved them in anything off piste, but on groomers they were hooky and unpredictable.
    A good retune through the machine and they ski awesome everywhere now.
    Don’t know why the tune was off as I’ve had 10+ pairs of ON3Ps and never had an issue.

  2. #9802
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    seatown
    Posts
    4,349
    i shifted from gummy to file on my woods96, hoping to be able to use the tails this weekend

  3. #9803
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    326
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    I hope you are right. I WANT you to be right. I kept saying...”why am I having to fight this ski so much on the groomers when it is AMAZING off trail?”

    I hate that I have to go screw with getting a new tune when someone obviously spent a decent amount of time putting a finish on the skis. I’ve never skied anything that felt this awkward on groomers...and I’ve tried a few skis. [emoji6]
    I have been skiing a pair for about a year and they seem fine. My guess is it is the tune.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #9804
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    4,647
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    I had the exact same feeling last season on my pair. I loved them in anything off piste, but on groomers they were hooky and unpredictable.
    A good retune through the machine and they ski awesome everywhere now.
    Don’t know why the tune was off as I’ve had 10+ pairs of ON3Ps and never had an issue.
    I seem to recall a post up thread where Iggy said there was a short period of time where they discovered issues with their stone grinder ... at least I think so Bottom line is ... tune 'em and luv 'em.

    Now ... if i could get my hands on some 179 BG 116 Tours (just sayin' ...).

    ... Thom
    Galibier Design
    crafting technology in service of music

  5. #9805
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    268
    kid-kapow made an excellent summary on the tune issue a few pages back:

    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...28#post6189728

  6. #9806
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    489
    Quote Originally Posted by PNW-skier78 View Post
    I have been skiing a pair for about a year and they seem fine. My guess is it is the tune.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Same, been skiing for more than a year on the WD108, no hookyness on groomers. Tail release fine. They're actually my low tide ski, since I ski the billy goats most of the time.
    90% of skiing is just looking cool

  7. #9807
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    2,473
    Quote Originally Posted by aanev View Post
    kid-kapow made an excellent summary on the tune issue a few pages back:

    https://www.tetongravity.com/forums/...28#post6189728
    In addition to those two post I can also post what Iggy wrote when he personally reached out to a few of us last spring to address the issues on our woodsmans. This is part of what he wrote - posted here as it is general and should explain what was off with the initial batch, and hopefully to save Iggy som time from having to repeat it.


    Quote Originally Posted by Iggy
    ... Based upon what you are describing, it sounds like we fucked up the tune and the base bevel is not enough or not consistent. That combined with sharp new edges could make for a pretty shitty ride.

    We struggled with the edge tune consistency last year with our Reichmann Ceramic Base/Side Edger (DTS-U) - enough so that we just pulled it off the production line and went back to belts around January until our Reichmann rep can come out and service it a few days (on hold with the virus right now). That said, we were doing our best to check every pair and should have been stopping production to work on the machine when problems presented (just consistency is the angle being applied - enough so we got sick of working on the machine until it can be serviced).

    On a stiffer skis, we've found edge issues are more pronounced (as it is harder to push the ski around), so that is why seems more centered here on the Woodsman. ...
    As mentioned in the last post, the base bevel was off on my pairs, but where retuning and detuning them (heavily) in front of/behind the contact points made for a much smoother ride. The retune/detune does not transform the skis into jibby-mc-jibsticks, but skis that has a strong edge hold on groomers, generate a lot of speed from the terrain if you pump yet release quite easily. The section underfoot and behind the heels is fairly strong as is usual from ON3P, so for a lighter and puny rider with shit technique like myself the softer mid section of for instance Mantra102 177s makes them even easier to release and manipulate than woods108 - at least on hard snow. I think my pairs will bed in nicely after more use.
    Last edited by kid-kapow; 01-08-2021 at 03:15 AM.

  8. #9808
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    Quote Originally Posted by Bandit Man View Post
    I hope you are right. I WANT you to be right. I kept saying...”why am I having to fight this ski so much on the groomers when it is AMAZING off trail?”

    I hate that I have to go screw with getting a new tune when someone obviously spent a decent amount of time putting a finish on the skis. I’ve never skied anything that felt this awkward on groomers...and I’ve tried a few skis. [emoji6]
    Pretzel is right. My Woodsies were good, but I've had more than one brand new ON3P w/ wonky factory tune. Edges want to engage even going straight.
    Sux to have to retune. Really your edges need rebeveling of base edge

  9. #9809
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Grand Junction Co
    Posts
    1,092
    Slight thread drift (my On3p’s are great) and I know there are other threads for this.

    If a skis tune is way off... do you just bevel the edges by hand? Or is the next step a stone grind then bevel edges?

  10. #9810
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,262
    You can
    On a machine, edges need beveling before they are run on the stone. Stone+metal=nõ bueño

  11. #9811
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    369
    This is probably terrible advice....I demo'd a pair of Woods 108's and loved them. So I bought a pair. The pair I bought was so hooky sometimes I thought my leg was going to break just going down a cat track. I couldn't figure it out. I got mad and took a rock from the parking lot and detuned the tips and tails. It made it into a whole new ski. I'm totally stoked on them now. After reading through the thread, it seems like there might be a better way to do this

  12. #9812
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Posts
    69
    Looks like I opened up the can of worms in this again but I think it's helping share information.

    Maybe it's worth mentioning the model year you have to narrow it down?

    I have yet to ski mine but they are 2019/2020. Ski hills here are closed so I won't get a chance to test them before my trip at the end of the month so I really hope they are good out the box. I will at least know there is a fix if I do run into issues.

  13. #9813
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    SEA>DEN>Spokanistan
    Posts
    3,204
    I love how dedicated people are to trouble shoot the WD!! Brand allegiance is strong with this crowd!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums

  14. #9814
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    girdwood
    Posts
    489
    I took Scott up on his offer last winter and sent my woodsman back to the factory for a retune. Can confirm that a retune fixed all issues. I thought I was crazy so somewhat glad to hear others had the same issue. And thanks to ON3P for helping out.

  15. #9815
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Hillsburrito
    Posts
    2,747
    Quote Originally Posted by SkiLyft View Post
    I love how dedicated people are to trouble shoot the WD!! Brand allegiance is strong with this crowd!


    Sent from my iPhone using TGR Forums
    It helps that the manufacturer is transparent.
    Training for Alpental

  16. #9816
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Tahoe
    Posts
    948
    If anyone has any WD108 tour's that are hooky that they want to get rid of let me know

  17. #9817
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Wenatchee
    Posts
    985
    Quote Originally Posted by Shredeagle View Post
    This is probably terrible advice....I demo'd a pair of Woods 108's and loved them. So I bought a pair. The pair I bought was so hooky sometimes I thought my leg was going to break just going down a cat track. I couldn't figure it out. I got mad and took a rock from the parking lot and detuned the tips and tails. It made it into a whole new ski. I'm totally stoked on them now. After reading through the thread, it seems like there might be a better way to do this[emoji2]
    Can we call you "Grog" with the evolutionary use of a rock.

    But seriously, if it works, it works.
    Common sense. So rare today in America it's almost like having a superpower.

  18. #9818
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,896
    I use rocks to detune all of my skis, I do it while skiing on a wind-dusted rock pile.

  19. #9819
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by kid-kapow View Post
    In addition to those two post I can also post what Iggy wrote when he personally reached out to a few of us last spring to address the issues on our woodsmans. This is part of what he wrote - posted here as it is general and should explain what was off with the initial batch, and hopefully to save Iggy som time from having to repeat it.


    As mentioned in the last post, the base bevel was off on my pairs, but where retuning and detuning them (heavily) in front of/behind the contact points made for a much smoother ride. The retune/detune does not transform the skis into jibby-mc-jibsticks, but skis that has a strong edge hold on groomers, generate a lot of speed from the terrain if you pump yet release quite easily. The section underfoot and behind the heels is fairly strong as is usual from ON3P, so for a lighter and puny rider with shit technique like myself the softer mid section of for instance Mantra102 177s makes them even easier to release and manipulate than woods108 - at least on hard snow. I think my pairs will bed in nicely after more use.
    What year were your 108 and 116s?

    I had this years 108 and after two days decided to part ways due to the "hookiness" people are describing.. Looking at this thread I jumped the gun on selling them. May have to give them another shot.

  20. #9820
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,431
    I've most definitely, on several occasions, taken my ski off somewhere on the mountain and rubbed it on a rock or metal handrail or whatever to detune.
    It works way better than a gummy, those things are fucking useless.

  21. #9821
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    369
    For the record, I think my Woodsman's were 19-20's. But the years kinda blend together these days.

    jackattack
    I use rocks to detune all of my skis, I do it while skiing on a wind-dusted rock pile.
    It doesn't look like you are a Big Sky skier from your profile??!!

  22. #9822
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    I've most definitely, on several occasions, taken my ski off somewhere on the mountain and rubbed it on a rock or metal handrail or whatever to detune.
    It works way better than a gummy, those things are fucking useless.
    Bastard file off amazon does wonders.

  23. #9823
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Your Mom's House
    Posts
    8,431
    Quote Originally Posted by K1mJ0ngTr1ll View Post
    Bastard file of amazon does wonders.
    Sure, if you're at your workbench or ski around with a file in your pocket.
    One of these is actually my preferred tool for deburring and detuning https://www.mscdirect.com/browse/tnp...xoCyW0QAvD_BwE

  24. #9824
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    idaho panhandle!
    Posts
    10,496
    I carry a small diamond stone and a gummy for my first day out on a new ski to adjust the detune as needed. I usually get it pretty spot on at home before they hit the snow.

  25. #9825
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by adrenalated View Post
    Sure, if you're at your workbench or ski around with a file in your pocket.
    One of these is actually my preferred tool for deburring and detuning https://www.mscdirect.com/browse/tnp...xoCyW0QAvD_BwE
    May have to order one!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •