Check Out Our Shop
Page 371 of 626 FirstFirst ... 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 ... LastLast
Results 9,251 to 9,275 of 15626

Thread: ON3P SKIS Discussion

  1. #9251
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    306
    Has anyone gotten 50/50's yet? Any weight numbers?

  2. #9252
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    写道
    Posts
    13,605
    Took the Wren 112s that I bought off of Waxloaf to Wolfy these past couple of days. They are indeed fine powder skis!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20201110_110715681.jpg 
Views:	242 
Size:	425.7 KB 
ID:	347185
    Your dog just ate an avocado!

  3. #9253
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ColoRADo
    Posts
    5,957

    ON3P SKIS Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Viva View Post
    Took the Wren 112s that I bought off of Waxloaf to Wolfy these past couple of days. They are indeed fine powder skis!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20201110_110715681.jpg 
Views:	242 
Size:	425.7 KB 
ID:	347185
    Those are 114s. I am actually about to sell my set that only has 7-8 ish days on them (damn knee rehab has me skiing different than I used to)

    Fucking love these skis.
    Last edited by PowTron; 11-10-2020 at 08:07 PM.
    You should have been here yesterday!

  4. #9254
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    185
    Was the Mera 102 quietly cancelled? They never became available and I don't see them on the site anymore.

  5. #9255
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    860
    Quote Originally Posted by Viva View Post
    Took the Wren 112s that I bought off of Waxloaf to Wolfy these past couple of days. They are indeed fine powder skis!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_20201110_110715681.jpg 
Views:	242 
Size:	425.7 KB 
ID:	347185
    Nice! Glad to see those getting out in the wild


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #9256
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by goolick View Post
    Was the Mera 102 quietly cancelled? They never became available and I don't see them on the site anymore.
    Going to end up custom only. Jessie too. With unit loss from Covid, we're struggling just to keep Magnus/Jeffrey/Woodsman in stock. Didn't want to release graphics that never actually got produced, and having to prioritize our top SKUs right now, so just pulled them for now. A couple other skis - Wren 102s, 179cm BG variants, 186cm M90, 171 J108, CD, J108 Tour - are likely one and done for the season too so once their runs are through that will be it for the year.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  7. #9257
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    182
    The 184 BG tours are back in stock (or are at least being produced now). Just put in my order.

  8. #9258
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    62
    ^ Yeah, couldn't resist anymore. Put in an order last night. BG 108 Tour with 2012 Caylor topsheets.
    Now I just have to decide how flimsy to go on the binding side...(?)

  9. #9259
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    906
    Quote Originally Posted by paal View Post
    Now I just have to decide how flimsy to go on the binding side...(?)

    Same, I've got some helio 180s I was planning to mount, but keep thinking "maybe I should do inserts for tecton instead..."

    I do really like the idea of < 2kg with bindings though. Decisions, decisions!


    Sent from my Pixel XL using TGR Forums mobile app

  10. #9260
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Down East
    Posts
    266
    I kicked this around in the mount your own fucking skis thread but want to get the thoughts of the ON3P collective experts.

    I have last years BGs with Shift bindings. I want to replace the Shifts with Pivot 15s. Due to hole overlap I would need to move forward or backwards 5mm. I would normally go back but with RES I am not sure. I don’t have a lot of time on these skis so I plan to get more time on them before deciding but thought I would throw this out here to get feedback.

  11. #9261
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Emerald City
    Posts
    644
    Quote Originally Posted by phatboy64 View Post
    I kicked this around in the mount your own fucking skis thread but want to get the thoughts of the ON3P collective experts.

    I have last years BGs with Shift bindings. I want to replace the Shifts with Pivot 15s. Due to hole overlap I would need to move forward or backwards 5mm. I would normally go back but with RES I am not sure. I don’t have a lot of time on these skis so I plan to get more time on them before deciding but thought I would throw this out here to get feedback.
    As someone who put Shifts on BGs this spring but still hasn't ridden them, is there a reason you're planning to swap em?

  12. #9262
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Rossland
    Posts
    159
    Quote Originally Posted by phatboy64 View Post
    I kicked this around in the mount your own fucking skis thread but want to get the thoughts of the ON3P collective experts.

    I have last years BGs with Shift bindings. I want to replace the Shifts with Pivot 15s. Due to hole overlap I would need to move forward or backwards 5mm. I would normally go back but with RES I am not sure. I don’t have a lot of time on these skis so I plan to get more time on them before deciding but thought I would throw this out here to get feedback.
    I had to go 2cm back on a pair of BGs due to a hole conflict, ridden them probably 70 days like that. I've wheelied out on some 15ft+ cliffs in deep snow but no complaints other than that. I've never ridden BGs at recommended though so ymmv.

  13. #9263
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by phatboy64 View Post
    I kicked this around in the mount your own fucking skis thread but want to get the thoughts of the ON3P collective experts.

    I have last years BGs with Shift bindings. I want to replace the Shifts with Pivot 15s. Due to hole overlap I would need to move forward or backwards 5mm. I would normally go back but with RES I am not sure. I don’t have a lot of time on these skis so I plan to get more time on them before deciding but thought I would throw this out here to get feedback.
    FWIW I'm at ~+1.3cm on 186's (for riding lifts) and +1cm on 189's (touring) and both pairs are unreal. I wouldn't hesitate to go forward +0.5 if you're second guessing going backwards.

  14. #9264
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,079
    Quote Originally Posted by phatboy64 View Post
    I kicked this around in the mount your own fucking skis thread but want to get the thoughts of the ON3P collective experts.

    I have last years BGs with Shift bindings. I want to replace the Shifts with Pivot 15s. Due to hole overlap I would need to move forward or backwards 5mm. I would normally go back but with RES I am not sure. I don’t have a lot of time on these skis so I plan to get more time on them before deciding but thought I would throw this out here to get feedback.
    Back, especially with Pivots.
    Seriously, this can’t turn into yet another ON3P thread....

  15. #9265
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Down East
    Posts
    266
    Not really. I have no issues with the Shifts, I have them on few pairs of skis. I have a pair of Pivot 15s and a second ski setup for the CAST system and have been kicking around the idea of switching over. CAST is new to me and I really like the build quality. Honestly I haven’t 100% convinced myself that doing the switch over would be worth it, that is what I am trying to sort out.

  16. #9266
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Down East
    Posts
    266
    Quote Originally Posted by iggyskier View Post
    Back, especially with Pivots.
    Do you think I would be ok with the 5mm from a screw hole standpoint. There are only two holes that would have this conflict. The two screws closest to the AFD plate on the toe. The remaining 6 would not come close to the other old holes.

  17. #9267
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,896
    Quote Originally Posted by phatboy64 View Post
    Do you think I would be ok with the 5mm from a screw hole standpoint. There are only two holes that would have this conflict. The two screws closest to the AFD plate on the toe. The remaining 6 would not come close to the other old holes.
    I shoot for 1cm center to center new>>old holes. When I overlay the mount patterns for Shift and FKS, it appears that going forward a few mm would allow 1cm spatial distance on the rearward toe holes (assuming the same BSL.)

  18. #9268
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Down East
    Posts
    266
    Yes. Based on your info and the pic curtesy of Spyderjon it looks like 5mm forward or 1 cm back. Normally this would be a non issue for me but the RES thing has me overthinking this. Based on Iggys feedback if I do this I will me 1cm back.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7CA4D32F-29DB-4FA6-BB8E-3730B25CA624.jpeg 
Views:	158 
Size:	182.5 KB 
ID:	348212

  19. #9269
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    974
    In heavy Woodsman 108 vs Wildcat 108 right meow.. Any one care to chime in and help me out since these skis have been out for a bit. I've looked all over this place and its still up in the air..

    Thanks in advance..

  20. #9270
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    Wildcat 108 = strong on edge, light, damp feel, but get kicked around a bit

    Woodsman 108 = Damp but energetic on3p feel. Can be pushed hard without as much fatigue as the wildcat 108.

    Similar skis in turn shape and stuff like that, but very different feel. Moment light and precice, on3p harder to explain = classic on3p feel.

  21. #9271
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    Wildcat 108 = strong on edge, light, damp feel, but get kicked around a bit

    Woodsman 108 = Damp but energetic on3p feel. Can be pushed hard without as much fatigue as the wildcat 108.

    Similar skis in turn shape and stuff like that, but very different feel. Moment light and precice, on3p harder to explain = classic on3p feel.
    Do you think one would be “easier” to ski than the other?

  22. #9272
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The Chicken Coop, Seattle
    Posts
    3,180
    Who’s got a billy goat 108 tour review? Also curious what peeps think of the 50/50 core.
    wait!!!! waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait...Wait!
    Zoolander wasn't a documentary?

  23. #9273
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    2,121
    Quote Originally Posted by K1mJ0ngTr1ll View Post
    Do you think one would be “easier” to ski than the other?
    Not really. They are both pretty stiff, maybe the woodsman, maybe.

    But if thats a concern the jeffrey is really good too, and definitely easier going than both.

  24. #9274
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    monument
    Posts
    7,468
    Once mounted 191 bear claw Billy Goat going up for sale soon.

  25. #9275
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    974
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_pretzel View Post
    Not really. They are both pretty stiff, maybe the woodsman, maybe.

    But if thats a concern the jeffrey is really good too, and definitely easier going than both.
    I know that many people mounted the Jeffery behind the line before the woodsman. Is that still a thing? I like to be around the -6 area.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •