
Originally Posted by
ncskier
I have a christensen arms ridgeline. It looks similar in both construction and price to that weatherby. I have it in 6.5 Creedmoor but hunt in the Southeast, Mid-west and Texas. So no experience with Elk. I would concur on needing a heavier larger bullet for elk.
As for the value, after years of shooting stuff like Savage, I can say the weight savings are worth it alone. The biggest difference was putting a Svarovski scope and keeping the weight down on the whole package. I've shot whitetail out to about 300 yds in some big fields.
I think your going to like it because weatherby builds some nice rifles with great service.
Well funny enough, I own the Christensen ELR in 6.5CM which I got for around $1K. The Weatherby is *supposedly* more accurate and is likely tighter in construction. But something tells me I'm splitting hairs here. Again, with the Christensen in the safe, I wouldn't have bought this Weatherby. But it'll be a good comparison.
For the record, my workhorse, go-to has always been my Tikka T3 Lite in .300WM. It's killed several mule deer, elk and even a Dall Sheep without a hickup, and has been dropped and beaten (went for ghost ride on a mule in AK and was found in the rocks) and it's still around a half inch rifle. After developing hand loads (Swift Scirocco 2's in 180g), it's tighter in groups than the Christensen 6.5CM seems to be able to achieve. And the Tikka was $750 at Sportsman's. That's why it's always my go-to recommendation for folks--I think it's impossible to beat from a value perspective. Sure the action is "loose," and the stock that comes on them seem cheap. Mags are plastic (you can buy aftermarket versions) and they're not sexy out of the box...but they will go toe to toe with any custom rifle out there, in my experience.
That said, the ELR is a shooter. I confidently shot my mule deer last year at 450 with no problem at all using 143g ELD-X.
"All God does is watch us and kill us when we get boring. We must never, ever be boring."
Bookmarks