I take a different message out of this, assuming it's true, which is highly questionable. Assuming the Santa Clara number is reasonably close to an average for the country--obviously higher in NYC, Detroit, NOLA, lower in some rural places (a questionable assumption but bear with me) that means that something that has infected 2-4% of the population has killed 40,000 + people. That means there are 96-98% of the population still susceptible, with no vaccine, no treatment, and no reason to believe that, unlike the flu, it will die down during the summer. How many of those still susceptible will eventually get the bug. If only 30% that's still hundreds of thousands of deaths. And there's no guarantee of a vaccine or a treatment, ever. So maybe more than 30%, maybe a lot more. To me that study is frightening, not reassuring.
Meanwhile, does this sound like the flu: https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...s/?arc404=true
Bookmarks