
Originally Posted by
Doremite
Those 98s are a fun ski. Find them to ski big for their dimensions - in a good way.
An interesting observation, and I think I know what you're getting at. I just recently re-started skiing those Wren 98s (184) last week and find that I enjoy them more than all of my other skis in anything other than 6+" of chop or the deep stuff. In those conditions, I do notice the 184 length and wished that they were longer. Today I skied them against my 108 Wrens (189 and disguised as Steeples in the above pic), in two-day-old freshies, and the 98s were way more fun and easier for me to ski. Gonna try this again tomorrow, but reverse the order that I ski each.
Around 95mm underfoot seems to be my sweet spot for most conditions . I already tried the Woodsman 98, but that experience was painful- That ski made no sense to me at all and I was flailing pretty badly on 'em. Now, I'm contemplating next year's Wren 96 Ti, but need to decide on length. 184 is mostly fine, but they feel short on certain occasions, as mentioned above. Plus I'm thinking about putting my 108 Wrens to bed for the rest of the season. I find that I'm liking that ski less and less unless there's 6+ inches of fresh. I guess I'm hoping for would to be to ski the new Wren 96s in anything and everything, until it's too deep and them reach for the Billy Goats (el Goatarinos).
Am I a high maintenance bitch, or what?
Your dog just ate an avocado!
Bookmarks